Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Excoin

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
We compiled the wallet on a Ubuntu server and have it running now, we apologize for the missing blocks. We are running into issues now where the client will seg fault regularly so we will be sending the logs and other details to the developers. In the meantime we will get a process manager watching the process to ensure it stays online.

2
Thank you for selecting us, there was a delay before we started producing blocks because we had not realized our vote count shot up so fast.

We have already started on the API Warpper. We are designing it as a bridge/abstraction that will allow anyone who currently is able to access the Bitcoin RPC API to easily intergrate BitShares into their platform. We will release start pushing the code to github once we have some basic structure and documentation. We will continue development on github from that point forward.

3
So far my impression is this community is very unhealthy, both the English and Chinese speaking community took no concern to verify my identity using PGP keys, no one reviewed code we provided and not as single person asked if we would be participating in the local economy by using our block rewards to hire members of the community.

Instead the concerns almost entirely revolved around if we could hold the block rewards essentially indefinitely or focused on limiting their short term loses from inflation on their current holdings or being critical of other communities. The atmosphere here is generally unprofessional overall and absolutely falls short of the marketing slogan "the future of banking".

As I said in my longer post that most everyone on both sections appears to be sidestepping, it appears not enough care was given to fair initial distribution and as a result of an early bubble investors are too afraid of inflation to actually utilize the system that has been put in place because most of them have lost money on their initial investment.

I don't make this claim because I wasn't elected, I make this claim because there are a 10 delegates (1 being a test), way too many init* delegates taking up the 101 slots. Less than 778 USD a day is being invested into the human capital of this institution, which is more on the level of a small business. It also appears no one wants to acknowledge that they will have a hard time finding contracters when the system requires them to pay 885 USD (not counting the many hours the campaigning will take) for a chance to run, which most likely given the statistics will fail.

The community will expect these contracters to work for essentially free until they prove themselves because the community is too lazy or unwilling or lack the skill necessary to do the proper work to vet potential employees. Because of this, the current system will primarily only appeal to people who already have a large stake in BTS, which a small pool.

I think the software is wonderful and has great potential, unfortunately the current execution is very poor and the community surrounding it has so far done little with it and as result the market has reflected those facts.

Unfortunately most people here will sidestep the points made in this this post like my previous posts because they are heavily invested instead of looking at the project and community critically and fixing the issues holding it back.

We will be stepping back as we do not have additional time to invest continually addressing this community repeatedly on the same points, but we will keep an eye on the project. Though we suspect some enterprising individuals will likely fork the codebase, give more attention to fair distirubution and come up with a more meaningful mission statement than make short term profit for early adopters and really take full advantage concept of DPOS.

I have learned a lot through the process, though an expensive lesson, in the end I feel it was worth it to learn more about BTS. I will post our article here with our analysis when it ready to be published.

4
It is pretty flexible. Shareholders have the possibility to approve / disapprove any kind of proposal.

It really is not as flexible as you are claiming and you have not really provided proof to back up the claim. You just simply stated a known fact.

The initial investment you have to front is proportional to the delegate pay you set. So if you have a 10% delegate you only pay 1/10 of what you pay for a 100% delegate.

However for 200 USD a month what kind of contract worker are you expecting to hire? And you are still discounting the amount of time required for the independent contractor to make the proposal. And there is no guarantee they will get funded. The balance of risk vs reward is not worth it for most independent contracts who do not already have a large stake in BTS. Which goes back to my points made I earlier, to be fair I think improvements can fix the problems but I don't think right now you will not find many independent contracts eager to offer their services unless they already hold stake in BTS.

This discussion has been interesting.

However, in your case, I did offer to loan you the registration costs which you did not need to repay until elected. You didn't accept that offer.

And I do appreciate that, but the specific discussion in those quotes is more about how the system in place not does not offer the proper risk vs. reward to attract the type of contract worker that many in the community seem to desire.

Please understand that I'm trying to understand BTS and the delegate system better and not just trying to be a delegate. I think the system is very good but I also think there is a lot of room for improvement. As it is now I fear that the current system does not work to attract smaller independent contractors (which we do not see ourselves as) who don't already have stake in BTS, these people could be very beneficial to BTS future.

5
It is pretty flexible. Shareholders have the possibility to approve / disapprove any kind of proposal.

It really is not as flexible as you are claiming and you have not really provided proof to back up the claim. You just simply stated a known fact.

The initial investment you have to front is proportional to the delegate pay you set. So if you have a 10% delegate you only pay 1/10 of what you pay for a 100% delegate.

However for 200 USD a month what kind of contract worker are you expecting to hire? And you are still discounting the amount of time required for the independent contractor to make the proposal. And there is no guarantee they will get funded. The balance of risk vs reward is not worth it for most independent contracts who do not already have a large stake in BTS. Which goes back to my points made I earlier, to be fair I think improvements can fix the problems but I don't think right now you will not find many quality independent contracts eager to offer their services unless they already hold stake in BTS.

This discussion has been interesting.


6
I appreciate your work. However, compared with BTS, Nubits is like a scam. If nubits  is also included on your exchange,  I doubt your sense of judgement and loyalty to BTS.

We are transparent in the fact that we have no loyalty to any specific piece of software and personally I think it detrimental to future progress to have religious-lke affilation to any particular software.

Blackwave Labs is focused on innovation and progress. To us the most important thing is the overall advancement of decentralized technology and cryptocurrency. We take the time to learn about the community, research the source code, examine the economics and we feel BTS is innovative.

If you are uncomfortable with working with people who don't share all the same opinions as you, you will quickly find yourself isolated from many talent people.

Edit: Also if you want to convince people that your opinion is the correct one, I would recommend that you back up your claims with arguments/reasoning. Hollow ad-hominem attacks are not professional and serve no purpose. Which as a board moderator you should know better and take care represent your community in a more professional manner.

7
It doesnt bother me whether you have nubits on your exchange.

This portion was primarily aimed at the response we got from the Chinese section, though there were a few members in this thread who also seemed to share a similar opinion.

And the ratio between dilution and long term advancement is relative and has to be efficient!

That is a truism, anything else would result in failure. We are not expecting or desire the BitShares community to fail, we believe the project is very creative and has a lot of potential.

Unfortunately I'm starting to suspect that the initial bubble and too little consideration given to initial fair distribution may end up causing the project to never reach its full potential. This analysis is not simply from reading the reception of our thread, but rather our general research on the DPOS system as it currently executed by this community.

That would be specific enough to measure your work. Compare this to how it would work with a normal company: You are in the role of a contract worker (API Wrapper) that has the potential to become a long term partner for other projects (gateway maybe). I would never hire a contract worker if he/she didn't detail what I listed above.

While I believe this is an interesting concept, the DPOS system as it exists now is not designed for this type of recruitment or employment.

To begin with in order for us to become a delegate we had to pay 885 USD up front with no guarantee our proposal would be accepted (and given the current number of delegates and the overall market cap we honestly did not expect for it to be).

In the current system, an independent contract worker would have to take on great risk for a commodity which many of the community will request is not liquidated. If in the rare event they are accepted, they have to wait a full two weeks before breaking even on their initial investment. This is not counting the amount of time necessary to campaign for the position in the first place, if that time is considered it could take a month to recover the costs of obtaining the position in the first place. Which may only last 2-3 months before being voted out by popular vote.

To an outsider this is not an attractive deal because the risk is not worth the reward. The system would have to see a lot of changes made for it to recruit people in the way you would like.

I also think it is worth pointing out that in my experience organizations whose work force is made up primarily of temporary contract workers the products they produce are of inferior quality. It does not give creative developers a platform to create, and most importantly it does not provide the security needed to take risks and fail.

This is why you find successful technology based companies like google giving employees paid free time to work on their own projects or Bell's famous Bell Labs being funded with no expectations beyond giving engineers the freedom and security to create. The rewards for sponsoring these sort of activities are often unpredictable and potentially highly profitable.

I still highly appreciate your presence here (!)

I appreciate being allowed the opportunity to engage the community and at the very least I hope we were able to make members of the community think critically about the current implementation and what it provides for.

In my opinion this is a mindset that Bitshares shareholders have to adopt to make their "company" work efficiently and efficiency is vastly important in a growth phase

In my opinion, during the early phase of a company you will need to make investments in infrastructure, secure good relationships with potential employees and generally build towards long term goals. The early phases of a business are risky, and investors expecting good dividends early risk stunting potential growth. It is the same reason you will find that Amazon operates at a loss but investors still flock to it.

For example, we have already invested much more time and money than the BTS 100% delegate is worth at this point, but we feel that shifting the opinion of the community is more valuable for the long term success of even the few thousand shares we hold or the larger investments we may or may not make.


8
中文(Chinese) / Re: 黑潮实验室
« on: January 06, 2015, 04:23:44 pm »
I think,  we don't want to give each a on-line BTS trading exchange set up pay100% Delegate? This is a very stupid idea

Or again,  we will give every claim to promote BTS people set up pay100% Delegate? I saw a lot of fraud in the staged

We can form a kind of atmosphere, to establish pay100% Delegate, register and open you are going to do, when after your success or achievement, and then ask you to vote

Also, the BM community share voting right, should not easily use, after must wait for community voting ends, and then consider whether it is necessary to vote, and vote should have a half-life


I'm against almost all of the pay100% Delegate,  including BM 


 :P :P :P

我们请求100%支付率,经过我们的计算,假设当前价格持续不变的话(这没法保证),收入大约会是2000美元。我们并不将受托人收入看成是付给我们的费用,倒不如说是补贴我们的部分成本,并以BTS股权的形式去缩小给开发团队所应得收入的差距。

我们并非业余的程序员,我们是行内专业人士,可以开发高质量的软件,并拥有已经被证实的资历。我们觉得我们提议的项目在BTS经济系统上具有积极意义,以及很高的价值,因此希望这些项目得到资助并保证它们可以完成得更快一点。

2000美元一个月是不足以雇佣一位高级程序员的。就像你买的任何东西一样,你一般得到三个特性中的两个:快速、便宜、高质量。如果你不觉得开发者的贡献值得社区去回报的话,那么你就很可能会发现围绕比特股的基础架构的发展逐渐地停滞,因为只有少数的早期用户会有动力去建立基础架构。

我们尝试成为一名受托人,很大程度上是为更加了解比特股和受托人制度。从目前来看,貌似早期的用家和大户会担心通胀影响到他们的投资。这显然是与比特股系统提供的优点相违背的。比特股有潜力成为一个革命性的工具,它可以回报和激励开发者(和其他人)去建造一个充满生机的加密货币生态系统。不过,如果比特股系统被那些担心短期利润而不是长远目标的早期投资者限制的话,这个项目永远都不会达到它的最大潜力,而会继续慢慢地衰退。

为了提供一个更清晰的观点,每天有3975枚比特币被挖出以支持比特币网络,这就是每天超过100万美元,而比特股投资者当前只有勇气去支持11位100%受托人,合每月是2.2万美元或者每天733美元。简单地说,一个月2.2万美元的费用甚至比不上一个中型公司应有的开发预算。当你考虑到社区成员希望比特股到达的那种规模的话,你就会知道这个是一个多么小的数字。

先说清楚一下,就像我们的在原帖里说的一样,我们并不是希望用一个100%受托人去运营交易所,也不是去用来加上BitCNY交易对。我们,黑潮实验室,是一个专注于加密货币的开发团队,同时是在运营一个交易所。而且,请求一个受托人职位去建造开源的API包装器,还会将比特股的功能加到我们即将开源的账户系统里面(就像第一个帖子描述的那样)。

我们不认为受托人是在支持交易所。我们请求你去赞助黑潮实验室,是因为我们的存在对每一个我们参与的社区都有积极的意义。我们有雄心壮志的计划,我们建造Exco.in让我们可以开发利润低但重要的开源加密货币项目。

这里的一些敌意好像起源于我们与其他可能有竞争性的社区之间的关系。用这种姿态去审视其他社区的话会有潜在的隐患,因为这会让你为了短期的利润而去疏远那些有才能的人,这些人支持的是更广泛概念的加密货币。

编辑:眼下这个过程很有教育意义,我们已经学习到了更多关于如何运行不同的DACs。我们正在写一篇文章去讲述这个过程的详情,以及加上我们对比特股以及社区的分析到https://blackwavelabs.com 上。

---

We requested 100% pay rate which we calculated to be estimated 2,000 USD if the current price holds (which is not guaranteed). We don't see the delegation as paying for our costs as much as subsidising a portion of our costs and bridging the gap with our development group by giving us stake in the BTS economy.

We are not amateur programmers, we are industry professionals that develop quality software and have a proven track record. We feel the positive affects of our proposed projects being created on the BTS ecosystem are valuable enough to want to assist funding their development and to ensure their completion happens faster.

2,000 USD a month would not cover the cost to hire a single senior developer. As with anything you buy you get two of three: fast, cheap or high quality. If you don't feel contributing developers merit rewards from the community, then you will likely find the infrastructure surrounding the BitShares overtime begin to stagnate as only a limited number of early adopters have the motive to continue to build infrastructure.

A large part of why we attempted to become a delegate was to learn more about BitShares and the delegate system. So far it appears that early adopters/large investors are afraid of inflation affecting their investment. This manifests by opposing the advantages that the BitShares system offers. BitShares has the potential to be a revolutionary tool that rewards and incentivizes developers (and others) to build a vibrant cryptocurrency ecosystem. However if the BitShares system continues to be held hostage by early investors who are worried about short term profits over long term goals, the project will never reach its full potential and it will continue on its slow decline.

To give perspective on this, 3975 BTC are mined each day to incentivize mining support for the Bitcoin network, which is well over a 1,000,000 USD a day, while BitShares investors only currently have the courage to support 11 delegates at 100% pay, totalling 22,000 USD a month or 733 USD a day. Simply put, 22,000 USD a month is not even an adequate budget for development even for a moderately sized company, and when you consider the scale many of the community members would like to see BitShares reach it is miniscule.

To be clear, as we said in our original post, we are not asking for 100% pay rate to operate the Exchange or to add bitCNY trading pairs. We, Blackwave Labs, are a cryptocurrency-focused development group who happens to operate an exchange and are asking for delegation to build open source API wrappers and add BitShares functionality to our soon to be open source accounting system described in the first post.

We don't see the delegation as supporting the exchange. We are asking you to sponsor Blackwave Labs because our existence has a positive effect on every community we are involved in. We have very ambitious plans and we built Exco.in to allow us to develop less profitable but important open source cryptocurrency projects.

Some of the animosity here seems to stem from our relationship with other communities that some feel are competing. Taking this position on other communities risks potentially alienating yourself from many talented people who support the broader concept of cryptocurrency over short term profit.

Edit: This whole process so far has been a educational experience and we have learned more about how different DACs operate. We are working on an article detailing the process and our analysis of BitShares project and community on https://blackwavelabs.com

9
I think,  we don't want to give each a on-line BTS trading exchange set up pay100% Delegate? This is a very stupid idea

Or again,  we will give every claim to promote BTS people set up pay100% Delegate? I saw a lot of fraud in the staged

We can form a kind of atmosphere, to establish pay100% Delegate, register and open you are going to do, when after your success or achievement, and then ask you to vote

Also, the BM community share voting right, should not easily use, after must wait for community voting ends, and then consider whether it is necessary to vote, and vote should have a half-life


I'm against almost all of the pay100% Delegate,  including BM 


 :P :P :P

我们请求100%支付率,经过我们的计算,假设当前价格持续不变的话(这没法保证),收入大约会是2000美元。我们并不将受托人收入看成是付给我们的费用,倒不如说是补贴我们的部分成本,并以BTS股权的形式去缩小给开发团队所应得收入的差距。

我们并非业余的程序员,我们是行内专业人士,可以开发高质量的软件,并拥有已经被证实的资历。我们觉得我们提议的项目在BTS经济系统上具有积极意义,以及很高的价值,因此希望这些项目得到资助并保证它们可以完成得更快一点。

2000美元一个月是不足以雇佣一位高级程序员的。就像你买的任何东西一样,你一般得到三个特性中的两个:快速、便宜、高质量。如果你不觉得开发者的贡献值得社区去回报的话,那么你就很可能会发现围绕比特股的基础架构的发展逐渐地停滞,因为只有少数的早期用户会有动力去建立基础架构。

我们尝试成为一名受托人,很大程度上是为更加了解比特股和受托人制度。从目前来看,貌似早期的用家和大户会担心通胀影响到他们的投资。这显然是与比特股系统提供的优点相违背的。比特股有潜力成为一个革命性的工具,它可以回报和激励开发者(和其他人)去建造一个充满生机的加密货币生态系统。不过,如果比特股系统被那些担心短期利润而不是长远目标的早期投资者限制的话,这个项目永远都不会达到它的最大潜力,而会继续慢慢地衰退。

为了提供一个更清晰的观点,每天有3975枚比特币被挖出以支持比特币网络,这就是每天超过100万美元,而比特股投资者当前只有勇气去支持11位100%受托人,合每月是2.2万美元或者每天733美元。简单地说,一个月2.2万美元的费用甚至比不上一个中型公司应有的开发预算。当你考虑到社区成员希望比特股到达的那种规模的话,你就会知道这个是一个多么小的数字。

先说清楚一下,就像我们的在原帖里说的一样,我们并不是希望用一个100%受托人去运营交易所,也不是去用来加上BitCNY交易对。我们,黑潮实验室,是一个专注于加密货币的开发团队,同时是在运营一个交易所。而且,请求一个受托人职位去建造开源的API包装器,还会将比特股的功能加到我们即将开源的账户系统里面(就像第一个帖子描述的那样)。

我们不认为受托人是在支持交易所。我们请求你去赞助黑潮实验室,是因为我们的存在对每一个我们参与的社区都有积极的意义。我们有雄心壮志的计划,我们建造Exco.in让我们可以开发利润低但重要的开源加密货币项目。

这里的一些敌意好像起源于我们与其他可能有竞争性的社区之间的关系。用这种姿态去审视其他社区的话会有潜在的隐患,因为这会让你为了短期的利润而去疏远那些有才能的人,这些人支持的是更广泛概念的加密货币。

编辑:眼下这个过程很有教育意义,我们已经学习到了更多关于如何运行不同的DACs。我们正在写一篇文章去讲述这个过程的详情,以及加上我们对比特股以及社区的分析到https://blackwavelabs.com 上。

---

We requested 100% pay rate which we calculated to be estimated 2,000 USD if the current price holds (which is not guaranteed). We don't see the delegation as paying for our costs as much as subsidising a portion of our costs and bridging the gap with our development group by giving us stake in the BTS economy.

We are not amateur programmers, we are industry professionals that develop quality software and have a proven track record. We feel the positive affects of our proposed projects being created on the BTS ecosystem are valuable enough to want to assist funding their development and to ensure their completion happens faster.

2,000 USD a month would not cover the cost to hire a single senior developer. As with anything you buy you get two of three: fast, cheap or high quality. If you don't feel contributing developers merit rewards from the community, then you will likely find the infrastructure surrounding the BitShares overtime begin to stagnate as only a limited number of early adopters have the motive to continue to build infrastructure.

A large part of why we attempted to become a delegate was to learn more about BitShares and the delegate system. So far it appears that early adopters/large investors are afraid of inflation affecting their investment. This manifests by opposing the advantages that the BitShares system offers. BitShares has the potential to be a revolutionary tool that rewards and incentivizes developers (and others) to build a vibrant cryptocurrency ecosystem. However if the BitShares system continues to be held hostage by early investors who are worried about short term profits over long term goals, the project will never reach its full potential and it will continue on its slow decline.

To give perspective on this, 3975 BTC are mined each day to incentivize mining support for the Bitcoin network, which is well over a 1,000,000 USD a day, while BitShares investors only currently have the courage to support 11 delegates at 100% pay, totalling 22,000 USD a month or 733 USD a day. Simply put, 22,000 USD a month is not even an adequate budget for development even for a moderately sized company, and when you consider the scale many of the community members would like to see BitShares reach it is miniscule.

To be clear, as we said in our original post, we are not asking for 100% pay rate to operate the Exchange or to add bitCNY trading pairs. We, Blackwave Labs, are a cryptocurrency-focused development group who happens to operate an exchange and are asking for delegation to build open source API wrappers and add BitShares functionality to our soon to be open source accounting system described in the first post.

We don't see the delegation as supporting the exchange. We are asking you to sponsor Blackwave Labs because our existence has a positive effect on every community we are involved in. We have very ambitious plans and we built Exco.in to allow us to develop less profitable but important open source cryptocurrency projects.

Some of the animosity here seems to stem from our relationship with other communities that some feel are competing. Taking this position on other communities risks potentially alienating yourself from many talented people who support the broader concept of cryptocurrency over short term profit.

Edit: This whole process so far has been a educational experience and we have learned more about how different DACs operate. We are working on an article detailing the process and our analysis of BitShares project and community on https://blackwavelabs.com

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Blackwave Labs/Excoin Delegate Proposal
« on: January 05, 2015, 09:37:13 pm »
Your website promotes NuBits heavily.. Was BitUSD considered for this role? Have you talked with the leaders of our project?

Our website promotes all innovators in the cryptocurrency ecosystem who actively develop, and we call out bad actors like XPY early on, so I think "promotes nubits heavily" would be an unfair/incomplete summary of the page.

We make it clear in our post we are generally interested in the concepts of distributed autonomous entities. bitCNY centric exchange and a BTC/BTS is what we are considering at this point in time for Exco.in with the potential to add more as we develop tools for BitShares.

We begun looking into BitShares after Nikolai wrote to us by email giving us details about the project.

Very good! The fact that you plan to open source the API wrapper has me sold. Voting and promoting.

Thank you, we appreciate the support.



To again clarify, we plan on creating and releasing the API Wrapper and the other listed projects open source regardless if we are elected as a delegate.

We propose that if the BitShares community offer support for our ongoing mission of promoting all innovative cryptocurrencies and providing high quality open source tools. Selecting our development group as a delegate, the community would allow us to allocate more resources to the listed projects (and other unannounced projects that are in planning) so that they can be completed quicker.

11
中文(Chinese) / Re: 黑潮实验室
« on: January 05, 2015, 07:10:53 pm »
很好,但是不明白你们为什么上线nubits的交易对,难道你们也认可他们的挂墙锚定?

谢谢您看我们的提议。我们不保证纽比特的挂钩策略一定会成功,但至今它有效。它是维持加密电子货币稳定的一个可行的办法。

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Blackwave Labs/Excoin Delegate Proposal
« on: January 05, 2015, 03:56:22 pm »
We added a translation to make our appeal to the wider community.

Thank you for all the input. It will be used to improve and clarify points in the proposal, we are still learning about BitShares and the delegate system, we appreciate your help through the process.

13
中文(Chinese) / 黑潮实验室
« on: January 05, 2015, 03:54:23 pm »
关于黑潮实验室

我是Samantha Chen,是币交中心(https://exco.in)的主要开发人员。币交中心是黑潮实验室(https://blackwavelabs.com)提供的服务之一。

 我们的使命是提供高质,透明,安全的服务。我们想要把比特股和相关项目加进去我们给提供服务的加密电子货币的列表。
 黑潮实验室于2014年8月成立,我们目前雇佣了两个全职的开发人员以及一些兼职的客服人员,翻译者,设计者,和开发人员。

币交中心-创新加密电子货币交易平台

币交中心是一个创新加密电子货币交易平台,我们只交易给加密电子货币全社区带来很大影响的币种。

更详细了解我们的工作过程,请访问: https://blackwavelabs.com

币交中心的性能:
连续不断的准备金证明,带签名的信息和地址展示用户余额以及币交中心本身备有的黑币量。
全功能API,能够随机产生各种有不同权限的API密钥。
非同步的交易引擎,能够同时匹配几百个交易业务
在web客户端上的实时用户界面
即时充值和提现,以0个确定用户开始收通知。
全中文化网页和普通话客服人员。
24小时之内回复客服问题。
站内客服聊天室。
多重验证。
我们创建和维护开源API包装器和实时交易机器人: https://github.com/excoinexchange




客服
站内:https://exco.in/account/support
电邮:[email protected]
推特:https://twitter.com/ExcoinExchange
因特网中继聊天:#excoin @ freenode
比特信:BM-NBrBDUeKW5ZCFbs8G78e6pGvVfFA8HxR

我们提议
 我们想要立刻开放一个比特股交易平台,测试一个以比特元为中心的市场和有机会扩展我们的服务。但是,我们目前没有适合的适配器能够把核算方法和准备金证明整合进去比特股API。我们要求我们任为有100%工资率的代表。

我们试图创建的开源项目

 1)API包装器-我们需要专门为比特股API的API包装器。我们还在调查最好的方法做好这个任务。

我们将会 a)创造一个桥接器使得我们能够把聪客户端RPC调用来跟比特股客户端互动。这个方法带来的好处是如果其他开发人员已经有目前存在的比特币客户端的合适基础设施,他们可以很容易地使用比特股基本的服务性能。
-或者-
b) 创建一个完整的API包装器以使用比特股全部性能。
这两个选项不是相互排斥的,我们以桥接器着手,然后再加上更多性能。

API包装器项目一完成就在github上发布了。

2)Vault-健全多种加密电子货币的核算系统具有在客户端上面的抽象复式簿记,支持准备金证明,储蓄黑币,冷钱包和其他紧要的工具以运用安全,透明的加密电子货币服务。我们打算完成我们开发的企业型付款门户Onyx,之后发布Vault的源代码,所以它可以通过同行审查然后加密电子货币社区的成员可以更容易地创建安全的应用程序。
3)Bits-这个地理位置性的钱包能够跟任何以聪客户端为基础的币种使用。(访问https://blackwavelabs.com 更详细了解)

早期的作品例子
https://exco.in - 创新加密电子货币交易平台
https://github.com/ruby-wallet/ruby-wallet - Vault的早期版本
https://github.com/excoinexchange - 我们为了币交中心创建API的包装器例子和用这些包装器的交易机器例子
https://github.com/BlackWaveLabs - 黑潮实验室一般项目仓库
https://github.com/drunkonsound - 仙的加密电子货币相关的项目github
https://github.com/ogminor - Samantha的加密电子货币相关的项目github

为什么投票给黑潮实验室?
 支持黑潮实验室不止意味着支持创建比特股的项目。支持我们等于和一个致力于改善质量标准,基础设施,创建开源工具和提供非中央化的解决方法的组织建立良好关系。
 我们公开指责社区里的邪恶角色,我们会用中英文撰写关于加密电子货币的文章,主张创意,以及和有创意性的社区团结合作。

我们希望您会考虑赞助我们的组织和相关的项目。

代表名:
黑潮实验室
blackwavelabs

工资率:
100%

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Blackwave Labs/Excoin Delegate Proposal
« on: January 05, 2015, 12:43:44 pm »
I don't understand the proposal ...
what trading pairs do you offer?

for a trading pairs like BTS/BTC or any other altcoin a positions as 100% pay delegate does not make sense to me as you can make your money from order fees ...
the only thing that would make sense to be are fiat gateways ... so .. bitUSD/USD pairs .. do you offer those?

Right now we don't offer any BTS related trading pairs because we don't have the required API wrappers written and modifications made to our accounting system. Currently our accounting system only supports Satoshi based clients.

We are interested in adding bitCNY centric trading, where bitCNY is the currency and BTC, LTC, DRK, BTS and others.

We will also open up BTC/BTS.

To be clear, as we said in our original post, we are not asking for 100% pay rate to operate the Exchange. We (Blackwave Labs) who happen to operate an exchange are asking for delegation to build open source API wrappers and add BitShares functionality it to our soon to be open source accounting system.

We are not amateur programmers, we are industry professionals that build very high quality software and have a proven track record of following through on projects to completion. We feel the positive affects from these projects being created on the ecosystem are valuable enough to want to assist funding their development and to ensure their completion happens faster.

15
General Discussion / Re: Exco.in - Innovative Cryptocurrency Exchange
« on: January 05, 2015, 12:41:15 pm »
Added link to our delegation proposal to the OP.

Pages: [1] 2 3