Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sschiessl

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38
1
General Discussion / Re: Business disruptor based on BitShares ecosystem
« on: October 15, 2019, 08:01:30 pm »
Hello Dinko,

and welcome to BitShares!

You can reach out to [email protected], we have extensive experience and knowledge in the BitShares ecosystem and could help you to find out how best to proceed.

2
General Discussion / Re: Planning a market making contest
« on: October 14, 2019, 06:34:11 am »
## Gateways
Gateways who have interest in participating in the contest please reply to this thread.
Every gateway needs to prove that its gateway assets are fully backed by real assets, like https://audit.bitspark.io/

Agreed, gateways should voice their support and willingness to be used as one of the turning points for this contest. Since it's basically free advertisement, they might consider reducing or reimbursing market fees?

What do you think with having a flexible bounty per day, that the committee adjusts? I could imagine that would lead to a better distribution, starting low and increasing it, more people will take notice after it has started and might jump in.

3
Thanks abit, I had PM'd Thule. The RC contains the referral and market fee fix.

I estimate we are one to two weeks away from the RC for the next big release.

4
取消抵押者的投票,就相当于给犯罪分子武器,而维护和平的警察却没有武器

It is not cancelled. The essential idea is that the margin position does not allow unnatural (and currently risk-free) voting power increase, and that a user would have the same voting power as before creating the margin position.

In any case, any change would need BTS holder approval, your threats are unnecessary and will cause an even greater rift.

5
General Discussion / Re: cn-vote union European exchange meeting
« on: October 08, 2019, 09:35:57 pm »
sorry for missing your post. i was in hamburg and tried to post my meetup info on tg but was got deleted/baned by admin.
i am in roma now and will go to zurich on oct. 10

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

Have safe travels! Next time

6
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: October 08, 2019, 08:08:41 am »
How long will this be active for then? It's almost been 2 weeks now.
Until MCR for bitCNY is set to 1.5.
Min. feedprice can be lowered to 0.20625 bitCNY/BTS

I very much doubt that lowering the threshhold will __ever__ happen, as long as the outside market price is lower. It would mean instant margin call for pretty much all positions.

7
General Discussion / Re: bitCNY live on LATOKEN from 14 October
« on: October 08, 2019, 07:15:38 am »
Some thoughts and numbers on the side:

The threshold price has the effect that margin calls are effectively disabled, and force settlements are targeting a price that deviates from market price. The peg for me is the market price, and as such defined by the trader. As such I would see the threshold price creating sort of undercollaterization (since the promise of settling for equal value in BTS is broken).

Looking at CoinMarketCap we have a deviation of 1% (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcny/, CMC is always weird), doing it by hand (BTS/bitCNY latest DEX price, BTS/BTC binance price, BTC/CNY binance price) I see a deviation of 4.5%. The feed price has a deviation of 7.5%. Interestingly, the traders do not exactly follow what the threshhold price dictates.

8
Yes, I have reminded Jademont to edit the API node url to the new one ( wss://api.1hour.win/ws ). :)
Interesting. Jademont again? If I'm correct Jademont is behind quite a few witnesses. Ideally witnesses should be somewhat independent. The worst scenario is a hostile takeover, I wish it's not our case.
I take it as compliment.

As a long term BTS holder since day 1, I have helped many person including some witnesses thus have connection with some of them, that's why it seems "I am behind a few witnesses". However, none of the current active witnesses belongs to me. To avoid conflict of interest, ety001 is the only maintainer of server, and he is responsible for price feeding, block producing, etc..

BTW, I do think for some active witness, whose owner has been inactive in community for long time, should not have support anymore. Producing blocks is the basic job for witnesses, but witnesses need to do more, especially when worker budget is cut. I have seen a lot good examples in other projects, for example, EOS, GXC, COCOS, etc.. We should learn from them.

Have you checked witness pay for your examples? At least EOS is not close to being comparable in that regards.

9
General Discussion / Re: cn-vote union European exchange meeting
« on: October 02, 2019, 06:09:24 pm »
Hey there,

appreciate the offer to meet!

When are you gonna be in Germany? We are located in South Germany close to Nuremberg

10
General Discussion / Re: worker for market cap management?
« on: October 01, 2019, 08:31:15 am »
How about we put the same amount of money into proper marketing?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29599.0

I would like to invite any- and everyone that is motivated to step up and participate! The selection of the current board is simply the motivated ones I could unravel so far.

11
General Discussion / Re: worker for market cap management?
« on: October 01, 2019, 06:18:35 am »
1. That is a Pump scheme that immediately enables that rich trader to dump all his other or anyone else's BTS for massive profit. A predictable and publicly announcment price increase is inviting too many malicious players

2. The committee-account has proven to not be a suitable escrow account as rules have been bent and re-defined without public discussion or re-approval. If it takes on a new worker, I would like to see confirmation of every single committee member accepting this responsibility

12
General Discussion / Re: New BSIP:GS protection via core code
« on: September 30, 2019, 08:37:58 am »
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/pull/224

This is not a statement of my personal or any others opinion, merely a proposed technical specification.

13
General Discussion / Re: New BSIP:GS protection via core code
« on: September 30, 2019, 08:21:58 am »
Should this be adjusted to accomodate the current notion of having a "floor price" while still allowing witnesses to feed actual external price?

EDIT: Just saw https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/179#issuecomment-536170317

14
中文(Chinese) / Re: 国内新增API节点汇总New APIs for Chinese users
« on: September 30, 2019, 06:08:29 am »
Infrastructure worker在香港推出的新产品

 -公共节点https://hk.nodes.bitshares.ws/ wss://hk.nodes.bitshares.ws/
 -对ElasticSearch https://hk.elasticsearch.bitshares.ws/的直接和只读访问。登录(简单的HTTP身份验证):BitShares /基础结构
 -ElasticSearch的API包装器https://hk.wrapper.elasticsearch.bitshares.ws/apidocs/

 可以在这里查看设置状态https://hk.wrapper.elasticsearch.bitshares.ws/is_alive

服务器
64 GB RAM
2TB Storage
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz
Up to 1Gbps

15
General Discussion / Re: how to judge the result of a poll worker?
« on: September 27, 2019, 07:38:46 pm »
Fabian had an iniative for that and created the bsip-threshold worker.

To manifest that one for bsips and polls, a bsip has to be written that is then voted in through old consensus (higher that refund for x days).

What happens right now is despotism in my eyes.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 38