Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GaltReport

Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 46
496
I'm starting to see how BitUSD could maintain it's expected market peg to USD within the BitShares system but I'm also starting to think about how one would spend either BitUSD or USD as one still needs to these days until people and organization directly accept BitUSD in place of fiat USD.  So, it seems to me that for me to pay my mortage if I am holding in BitUSD it would be:

BitUSD->BTSX->Bter Exchange->BTC->Coinbase->Bank Account->Mortgage Company

which is still too unnecessarily convoluted.  What is the Ideal?  BitUSD->Mortgage Company ?? 

What is realistic?  BitUSD->CoinBase->Bank Account->Mortgage Company ?


497
Try this:

1dollar bill equals $1.
4 quarters equal $1.
10 dimes equal $1.
20 nickels equal $1.
100 pennies equal $1.

So sometimes you have different coin worth different amounts and depending on how many of each coin you have they can add up to $1.

BTSX and bitUSD are similar in this same way.

BTSX are the coins that can add up to 1 bitUSD. The only difference is that people get to decide how much value BTSX has every day, hour, minute and second relative to a dollar. Thus, BTSX will constantly be changing from a "Penny" coin one day, to a "quarter" coin on some other day.

For example:

2 days ago, 115 BTSX equaled 1 bitUSD (approximations)
Yesterday, 33 BTSX equaled 1 bitUSD
Today, 40 BTSX equals equals 1 bitUSD

Here is the kicker: 1 bitUSD always equals $1.

So, is buying bitUSD like cashing out without having to pay taxes?

498
You did a great job CoinHoarder!  +5%

Good to see Bytemaster's post as well.  Bitcoin 2.0 forum their would be great.

499
General Discussion / Re: "Bitshares - The Great Satan on the Blockchain"
« on: August 23, 2014, 07:48:11 pm »
This may actually be good for Bitshares.  It is turning out to be very good reading and very helpful to me to read the debate at the original link.  Thanks to those here who are posting there. 

It's actually a good strategy to consider the arguments against your product and answer your critics in advance if possible.  You could even make it part of an FAQ...Is Bytemaster Satan?  Are the delegates the crypto equivalent of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committiee) of the Federal Reserve?


500
Technical Support / Re: BitsharesX Version 0.4.7 Report
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:18:12 pm »
Something's wrong.  I mean really.  I cannot sync my wallet. It's really slow.  I hope the Bitshares crew are looking into it.

I have 1 new server like this.  has only 1 connection.  previously had 0 for a long time.  says 3 hours remaining.  Oh, maybe it's that chain server thing?  Saw a post by bytemaster saying if it is using chain server it will show 0 connections.

501
General Discussion / Re: The trolls are out at Bitcointalk
« on: August 22, 2014, 09:11:11 pm »
I think the "team" should be prepared for some tech/hack attacking once they pass the laughing/ridicule phase....more success=more attacks.  BE VIGILANT!

502
General Discussion / Re: "Bitshares - The Great Satan on the Blockchain"
« on: August 22, 2014, 07:16:52 pm »
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Mahatma Gandhi


http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/mahatmagan103630.html

503
General Discussion / Re: Delegates now Earning $125 per month....
« on: August 22, 2014, 07:09:29 pm »
I will then decommission the lower paying one.  Is this not allowed or frowned upon ?  If so, just ignore.

My fault I didn't know all the rules though.  The delegate is very reliable and only missed blocks on one of the early versions.

same very high-end reliable server class.

it is not frowned upon and actually is encouraged at the moment, which seems silly to me. The point is that you don't vote for one delegate and then that delegate jacks up his rates without you knowing. The downside is it creates a market with infinite upward pressure.

I'm still advocating for a mechanism by which delegates can raise their rates in a transparent way by publishing rate changes a few days ahead of time. That will be great for the network since it will actually allow a delegate pay rate market to form where some delegates can peg their income to bitUSD, which is impossible with the current rules.

 +5%

504
General Discussion / Re: Delegates now Earning $125 per month....
« on: August 22, 2014, 06:53:48 pm »
It would be good if there was some way to adjust the payrate periodically or have it automatic somehow based on reliability, blocks produced etc....I know there is a reason for it the way it is but maybe there is some adjustment possible.

505
General Discussion / Re: Delegates now Earning $125 per month....
« on: August 22, 2014, 05:08:37 pm »
And market fees haven't even started yet...
+5%
How does it feel to know you were right all along?

And it's much more efficient than wasteful mining.

I am getting $12.5/month due too my low pay rates ...

Please vote for my sub account delegate:

delegate.liondani
wallet_approve_delegate delegate.liondani

payrate 5% under average payrates that means at 79% right now  ;)

Your pay rate is 5%? You know you should probably ask for 50%.
But if we are going at cost then it only costs around 5% if you don't take any profit for your time.

I am in the same boat here, at 5%.  I have added a new delegate named  delegate1.john-galt  at a  50% pay rate. 

If you are kind enough to be voting for delegate1-galt please vote for delegate1.john-galt


I will then decommission the lower paying one.  Is this not allowed or frowned upon ?  If so, just ignore.

My fault I didn't know all the rules though.  The delegate is very reliable and only missed blocks on one of the early versions.

same very high-end reliable server class.

506
General Discussion / Re: Is this price sustainable?
« on: August 22, 2014, 01:59:13 pm »
Speculators never have to leave our network... thus the external selling demand will be much lower... almost entirely people looking to "cash out".

Imagine if everyone that is a Bitcoin BULL didn't have to sell on the exchanges to day trade?

I think the true value of what you all have built will take some time to sink in but once it does, it should be a clear game changer.  It's one thing to see this all in words in the forum and documents over these many months but I must say that it's QUITE another thing to actually SEE THE MARKET FUNCTIONALITY IN THE WALLET

I think it will create a real visceral response in many people and that type of response will move people to take action.

507
So there's a lot of talk "around the watercooler" here this week, as I'm sure you can guess.  With BitSharesX $50 million to litecoin's $158 million, it looks like we're already 1/3rd of the way to another historic milestone.  This is faster than even we had anticipated, so it begs the question:  What date do we pass litecoin in market cap?


I'd like to make this fun, so I'm gonna put some money in the pot. Well, not money, something better....BTSX.  I'll tip 10,000 BTSX to whoever comes the closest to guessing the correct date.  You don't have to get the actual date, just be the closest.  So it's not open ended, let's limit this to only the responses posted here by midnight, Aug 24th.

So, what date does BitSharesX sit at the right hand of the almighty Bitcoin in the #2 spot?  And better yet, what are the reasons you guessed that date? Should be interesting.  Good luck.

B

September 5th 2014.

Remember, remember, the 5th of September (close enough!)....That would be awesome.

508
So far so good as far as crashes or missed blocks go.  No crashes or missed blocks.  I do see the disconnect messages though.  Actually, just one:

"I am disconnecting peer 78.46.32.25:1776 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid"

I continue to see large spikes in cpu and network traffic in and out during wee hours of the morning east coast time.  FYI for those who may have lower performance delegates.

509
Yeah, something's not right about it.  Probably just needs to be updated somehow.

510
I always do this:

git clone https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx.git
cd bitsharesx
git  checkout 0.4.5
git submodule init
git submodule update
cmake .
make

so far no problems.

Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 46