Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
as the bitUSD shorts just expired, we have 50 million BTS been forced to dump to the market
what would the person who collet the most bitUSD do next?
You are not innovatingDo you even read what you write?
Let me give you counter examples:
- DPOS
- MPA
- TITAN
- VOTE
- ...you are put in a lot of useless featuresname just one!introduse tones of bugsSure .. that's how coding works .. that's by the way why the release number is
0.7.0 and not 3.4 or even 10 (X) ... The sofware is still labeled beta .. If you
are not fine with that.. dont use it.. don't invest into it..creates unbelivable complexitiesI can believe almost everything .. except that that *they* introduce complexity
.. That's just wrong .. The market forced them to introduce extra complexity ..
and the people are still asking for more complex feature (i.e. relative orders)
We can feel lucky the devs are still considering them. Some other request have
been denied as too complex to implement, too!!Quotehardforks and inflate the BTS cap.. not .. again ..
You are not find with the merger .. fork the blockchain and start your own.
period!Quotethus destroyed the BTS price, job well doneThey not even sold for tax purpose .. At least Stan noted somewhere that he
NEVER sold a single Larmier (phun inteded) ..
So they are for sure not the once 'destroying' the price .. it's the market
participants that *still don't get it*(tm)
Also Bitshares is going to have to keep innovating. If it stops innovating the other competitors aren't going to stop.
Heh. That's one thing we've never been accused of.
The UNKNOWN bug is a sideeffect of titan and not really a bug0.4.12 still has the UNKNOWN bug with messed up balance, will they ever fix that problem?
Quote from yiminh (with 2 slight modifications):
"hehe, this is fun,I'llwe'll wait couple of days to see ifanyone elseyou can figure it out:) "
Check the recoverfunds page on the wiki and rescanning that particular transaction might help
Given price feeds, I think mandatory covering at $0.90 on the BitUSD for which ever short position is least collateralized adds liquidity and protects the network from under-collateralized shorts.
hehe, this is fun, I'll wait couple of days to see if anyone else can figure it out:)
Even if you have the right answer and we come up with the same one we'll never know. Of course you'll jump up and down saying, "Yes! This was my idea!" Frankly it just comes across as looking for attention. So, on that note I'm done responding to your attention bate posts.
Sure, only if it is implemented without changes you get the 1 Million bounty!
10Mil are you nuts?
Don't you think it's worth 10M BTSX if it worked?
Perhaps. But it's just your idea versus everyone else's that are posting up and everyone else thinks they have the solution too. Difference being of course they're collectively trying to solve a problem and you're...I'm not sure what you're doing lol. Buy a lot of BTSX, throw your golden screwdriver out there, and if it works your shares make you rich. If it doesn't you're no further behind.
