如果代表们没有意见可以一直运行下去。目前每块的代表报酬已经减到0。8个btsx。报酬和当天的收入成比例。所以只要有任劳任怨的代表，就要稳定的btsx网络

Quote from: jojomaster on August 10, 2014, 02:03:14 pm

现在还能投么

现在只能接盘....

  不服气的话可以做我下线哟 

这个币能火，当初i应该多ipo几份。
如果按他们计划明年2月整合入银行网关，如果成功，可以被btsx所用，只要锚定node币就可以直接把法币资金注入btsx系统

FYI.
bm, following are all loaded questions. Better to skip

I have several questions, in addition to the one you have yourselves, regarding how useful such test is going to be:

How long this test gonna run? – a day, a week, 2 weeks?

Do you have at least 50 physical humans participating?

Setting outside ‘centralized’ bank? – If this is indeed part of the test, it seems like  waaaaay to much work, for not much benefit.

Even if the test fails – are you not going to try it for real?

me可以综合下面优点 privacy（私隐） + public accounting（公开 ） + regulatory compliance（市场的股票条例） 

要看更多信息看原贴系列。。。

I would like to add some insights I had in the shower...

A downfall to restricting owners of a stock to a certified set is the loss of privacy.   Fortunately, we can use Ring Signatures + TITAN to allow someone to prove they are a member of the SET of authorized users without revealing which member they are.   

Now we can have privacy + public accounting + regulatory compliance.

按北美习惯叫casino是中文开始了的谐音。100多年前中国铁路工人晚上开赌前都是这样叫“开始囖，开始囖”,所以北美的赌场都叫casino

i heard lots of complains from chinese community since chinese  heavily depend on  mobile phone and has around 1 B mobile user. It is not convenient for them to key in alphabet and number  by using one hand.  ie. for "P2P", mobile user need to switch to number keypad screen twice.

p2p is not mobile user friendly . Can we change to something more mobile user friendly suffix like "ppp" ,"dns", "ooo"

DNS 发布在即，等了好久都没人提出这个问题。

P2P 这可是数字和字母混搭，犯了优秀域名的大忌。老外的网站可是宁愿10个字母以上也不愿意用字母数字混搭的。以后如果发展到移动平台上，输完字母 ' p ' 还要切换到数字键盘输入 ' 2 ', 再切换到字母键盘输入 ' p ' 这可不是一般的麻烦。而且美学上说google.p2p   baidu.p2p  这样的域名也是不够好的。我觉得后缀就算直接用   .dns 也比这个要好。大家怎么说呢？

BM对DNS系统竞标的解释，很简单，也容易懂

I would actually like to comment on this process some to encourage users to make larger bids rather than the minimum possible bid.

A bids 10 for "name" and pays the network 5 as dividends.
B bids 20 for "name", pays A 12.5 and the network 2.5
C bids 30 for "name", pays B 22.5 and the network 2.5
~ no body bids for 3 days, C won the domain for a total of 25
C puts the name back up for sale at 20
D bids 25 and pays it to C. 
E bids 27 and pays it to D.

After the initial bidding, the network does not collect fees from the auction except from the per-byte transaction fees.

Under these rules someone can secure a name cheaper if they bid higher initially because they increase the amount they must be outbid by to lose the name.  So if I attempt to do many small bids then chances are I would pay more than if I made a big bid and hope no one would be willing to raise the bar by 2x what I did.  If they do then I profit dramatically.   This means that the person who wants to actually own the name is motivated to bid their highest possible bid on the first go so that they might get the domain as cheaply as possible.