Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Felix

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
76
General Discussion / Re: best solution for merging ags、pts and btsx
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:49:40 pm »
To compensate ags/pts holders, Invictus should use the btsx shares of its own to buy back both ags and pts instead of increasing 20% of btsx total amount. As such, 2 billions btsx shares need not be expanded.  Actually, as Invictus holds a lot of ags/pts, the big part of the btsx shares Invictus consumes still go back to Invictus. I thinks  that this is the best solution.
I think not. These funds should be used for further development.

But Invictus buys back ags/pts by adding 20% btsx shares, which definitely impairs btsx holders. Although btsx shareholders will possibly acquire some shares of future DACs, this is really alike the previous commitments made to ags/pts holders. And now btsx holders think that Invictus protects itself well from any loss and risk!isn't it?

77
General Discussion / best solution for merging ags、pts and btsx
« on: October 21, 2014, 02:15:31 pm »
To compensate ags/pts holders, Invictus should use the btsx shares of its own to buy back both ags and pts instead of increasing 20% of btsx total amount. As such, 2 billions btsx shares need not be expanded.  Actually, as Invictus holds a lot of ags/pts, the big part of the btsx shares Invictus consumes still go back to Invictus. I thinks  that this is the best solution.

78
我不认为btsx本身有多大,music+vote+dns+lending+insuarance远远大于btsx产生的价值

要知道,产生bitusd只能是btsx

79
楼主分析得非常正确,非常可观,绝对支持!楼下几个人反对的人,简直不可理喻!
4亿btsx是白白增加的!!!3I通过稀释btsx,来回购了pts和ags,然后为了安抚btsx的持有人说,以后可以享有其他DAC的分股!这个承诺,几乎跟当初对ags和pts一模一样的承诺!合理作法,3I公司用自己的资金去回购pts和ags,至于后面,是否把ags、pts、btsx合并,那是后话!

支持楼主!

80
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 只是为增发开个头
« on: October 21, 2014, 11:50:29 am »
靠增发去拓展客户群??绝对是馊主意!现在btsx系统总共才值多少钱,如果一个客户进来,就要增发股份给他,后面如此庞大的bts价格怎么增长?要想增加客户,关键要拓展承兑商,这样各种各样的客户收到bitusd,能够很容易换成法定货币,其次,承兑商可以给客户进行返点优惠,这样对于客户来说,利益很明确了!!!

81
既然其他DAC融入了bts,那么btsx的持有者也应该享有DAC股份分配权

82
最重要的是,ags、pts的持有人已经分过一次btsx了,现在又要分给他们了!有些人要说,btsx的持有人以后会享有其他DAC的股份,但试想,3I公司的核心价值集中体现在btsx系统里面,其他的DAC次要多了!

83
I cann't understand the reason why AGS/PTS holders have already acquired btsx shares and now will be allocated again by diluting btsx shares!!!

It's not diluting, it's a merger. BTSX is buying out AGS and PTS. I love it!

You as a BTSX holder would also receive dividends on all future DACs. Isn't it great?
In nature, it is a dilution! Btsx system is the key product for 3I. Even if btsx system doesn't merge AGS/PTS, it will have a good future too.

84
I cann't understand the reason why AGS/PTS holders have already acquired btsx shares and now will be allocated again by diluting btsx shares!!!

85
Yep! Good point! BM shall not scatter at intervals this kind of "uncertain" ideas which impact greatly the market. Contrarily, the quality of wallet needs improving well.

86
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 20, 2014, 03:38:53 am »
Conclusion:  sacrifice the benefit of btsx shareholders in order to compensate that of ags/pts holders.  But why not allocate annual bonus to ags/pts holders as an indemnity???
 
as a predict, btsx will be stronger, better! It sounds very nice but when? Also, even if btsx shareholders have no loss, invictus will still push forward btsx ecosystem for success.  right?

87
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 19, 2014, 09:09:24 am »
here some of my opinions:

1:let ags/pts holders  have a quantity of  shares of all DACs is definitely a bad idea! It's more acceptable that AGS/PTS holders get the annual bonus of 3I company.

2: Btsx hard fork should be avoided as soon as possible. This idea is similar to financial QE! If it is unavoidable, the benefit of all original btsx shareholders should be well considered.

3: But in order to resolve the issues from ags/pts holders, we can do the btsx hard fork for only one time. Again, it must still consider the benefit of all original btsx shareholders. Maybe all three parts can share new shares in proportion. After that, ags/pts should disappear in 3I and only btsx shareholders still exist!

hope that these ideas help to remove equity issues in 3I! By the way, actually, I think that btsx shareholders should get a quantity of other DACs shares because other DACs take way of btsx techniques!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]