Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - litepresence

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
16
If you didn't have the ability to resolve the problem of bitcny

You seem to miss the point that bitcny has no problem, it is working perfectly in bitcrab's world:

Issue bitcny to yourself at significant discount... NEVER get margin called on bad debt because the biggest debt holder makes all the rules on debt issuance.   Then just sell it to unsophisticated ignorant "investors" at 1:1 CNY on various scam chinese sites... and lock in his power with leveraged collateral voting on recycled debt and use of exchange cold storage.

bitEUR just isn't a fully functional scam.... yet!

17
I propose to rename bitassets to crabshitcoins, then report OP to SEC for yet another attempt at market manipulation.   

https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/pull/249

Quote
Re-add BSIP-83: Decouple BitAssets from Platform Governance Process #249
 Open   pmconrad wants to merge 1 commit into bitshares:master from pmconrad:bsip83


https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-89

Quote
Press Release
SEC Awards Over $27 Million to Whistleblower
Amounts Awarded to Whistleblowers by SEC Now Exceed $400 Million
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2020-89

Washington D.C., April 16, 2020 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced an award of more than $27 million to a whistleblower who alerted the agency to misconduct occurring, in part, overseas.  After providing the tip to the Commission, the whistleblower provided critical investigative leads that advanced the investigation and saved significant Commission resources.

“This award marks several milestones for the program,” said Jane Norberg, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower.  “This is the largest whistleblower award announced by the Commission this year, and the sixth largest award overall since the inception of the program.  This award also brings the total amount awarded to whistleblowers by the SEC over the $400 million mark.” 

The SEC has awarded approximately $425 million to 79 individuals since issuing its first award in 2012. All payments are made out of an investor protection fund established by Congress that is financed entirely through monetary sanctions paid to the SEC by securities law violators. No money has been taken or withheld from harmed investors to pay whistleblower awards. Whistleblowers may be eligible for an award when they voluntarily provide the SEC with original, timely, and credible information that leads to a successful enforcement action. Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million.

As set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose information that could reveal a whistleblower’s identity.

For more information about the whistleblower program and how to report a tip, visit www.sec.gov/whistleblower.

18
HONEST MPA feeds are updated hourly by each feed producer, if the feeds are older than 4 hours they are no longer considered valid.   

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32035


19
simple solution:

BALLOTS:

chain offers ballots
ballots cost one bts per ballot

ballots are not transferable and non returnable; effectively proof of bts burn.

STAKE:

bts must be stake locked to vote

user specifies days of lock, machine counts down

user may add (but not take away) funds or duration to the countdown clock at any time.

during stake lock bts is non transfer / trade

POWER:

voting power = min(bts locked, ballots owned) * days of stake locked bts remaining





COLLATERAL:

add to that any bts held as collateral cannot be locked for voting.

PROXY:

add to that that proxy decays linearly over 365 days and requires user to vote stake lock their bts against owned ballots for proxy to have power.

RESULT:

Now you want to vote? first you burn a bts to buy a ballot.  It is difficult with custodial funds.
and you want to vote you stake lock on countdown timer. This is also difficult with custodial funds
and if you want to proxy your voting power you are held to same standard.
collateral bullshits occurring are patched 
legally bts is still a required "utility voting token" to fill ballots owned, purchased only with bts

now you want to gamble with the switches in bitshares voting box you have "bts futures" and "burnt bts" on the line, not just proof of momentary wealth. interests in promoting the bts core token price in the future are aligned with votes

you want to be an owner?  buy in and act like an owner.

problem solved


ps move everything to likert scales

pps split ballot burn to 1/3 "null burn account" 1/3 "reserve pool" 1/3 "dividend split among ballot holders"

20
Please share your thoughts and comment

I am not of the opinion that monetary policy should change over time.  Nor should it change for the purposes of marketing or expanding monetary supply. 

I think if you wanted such an instrument and you believe it is indeed a path forward then you should create it AT ONSET with such clearly DECLARED and PERMANENT parameters.  Then set it loose on the market and see if there is interest.   Anyone can create an MPA and all off the features you have mentioned could be part of the price feed scripts for that MPA; perhaps with the owner of the asset having additional mechanical control over the force settlement time.  Though the feed producers themselves could be multisig owners to distribute those mechanics.

I am a strong believer that parameters of MPA's - once created - should rarely, and if ever:  Only be "tweaked" if there are existential critical exploits to be patched.    I believe in stability, non politicization of monetary policy above all else.

My price feed scripts are open source and could easily be forked for your purposes.  I encourage you to compete with my products which do not include such "features".    But once you set it loose... I strongly encourage you to stop tweaking because that destroys the sense that the product is mechanical in nature and can be trusted - by long term holders, as a store of value - over time.

The aim of an MPA, as I believe, is to eliminate - with as high certainty as possible - the 3rd party human element, which can flip levers to change monetary policy over time; thereby "picking winners and losers"

21
General Discussion / Re: Review of BAIP2
« on: March 29, 2020, 08:19:46 pm »
if you are too stupid to understand what is shorting attack/ death spiral, I don't know how to explain to you.

What made bitshares have ANY value from the beginning was the notion of decentralized oracle market pegged assets that could be traded on a decentralized exchange platform.  THAT was the niche value proposition.   Your bullshit has poisoned the decentralized oracle well and killed market pegged assets and HENCE bitshares has no value because it is no longer a place where you can trust the value of the witness supported decentralized smart coins.   

No trustworthy decentralized oracle = 
Witnesses are not trustworthy =
No unique niche value proposition =
Bitshares is a shitcoin in a sea of other shitcoins =

DEATH SPIRAL


and there is not a bsip or baip in the world related to protecting your long lost debt position from fictitious "shorting attacks" that will EVER save it.  Not a price feed moving average, not a settlement fee, not a pegging the price to the core token, not MSSR = 1, not MCR = 1; all you do is devalue the core token further.

You are a loser.  Your debt is worthless.   You've killed a blockchain that talented developers have spent close to a decade building. 

You and everything you stand for is a disgrace, fraud, and scam. 
Anyone with a half bit of sense knows it.

Expect from this day forward anything you post in the English speaking world will be responded to with this quote:

Quote
CHINA http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/csrc_en/about/contact/
USA https://www.sec.gov/tcr
EU https://www.esma.europa.eu/whistleblowers-corner

If you report bitcrab to SEC
you may be eligible for up to 10%
of any money recovered as a reward!

Eventually, someone will grow fed up with you enough to deal with .gov and you can finally enjoy your concrete box, orange jumpsuit, and daily serving of pickle ends and reconstituted potatoes... that you so clearly crave. 

Until then... please do everyone a favor and go lick a used N95.


22
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 29, 2020, 04:05:21 pm »
I do not want to explain more to the guys who just say others do not understand this and that, it's wasting time.

The best thing that could happen to bitshares is for you personally to end up in concrete box with bars after an anonymous report to state security and exchange commission.   And all your friends and associates locked up and fined as well. 

Please somebody, do us all a favor, and report this asshole:

CHINA http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/csrc_en/about/contact/
USA https://www.sec.gov/tcr
EU https://www.esma.europa.eu/whistleblowers-corner

If you report to SEC you may be eligible for up to 10% of any money recovered as a reward!

Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

23
General Discussion / Re: Review of BAIP2
« on: March 29, 2020, 02:06:15 pm »
in the last 3 days BTS experienced the first rapid downtrend after the implementation of BAIP2, and the case provide a chance to review what BAIP2 bring to us.

The purpose of BORROWING a smartcoin from the chain is to SELL IT SHORT.

If you choose to horde it instead,  then you DESERVE to get margin called.

Quit hording debt and this is no longer an issue.


You PERSONALLY and all of your bullshit BSIPS and BAIPS related to making margin call impossible are what have ruined the architecture of the smartcoin ecosystem.





24
General Discussion / Re: bitCNY live on LATOKEN from 14 October
« on: March 29, 2020, 01:53:29 pm »

LATOKEN is a Top-20 crypto exchange

No it is not. 

Ranked 47 by liquidity here:
https://coinmarketcap.com/rankings/exchanges/liquidity/

Ranked 67 here w/ 6/10 trust score
https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges

Ranked 48 here w/ C trust score
https://nomics.com/exchanges

F Trust rating here
https://www.comaps.io

You buy more BTS make the price above 0.22 then it's pegged again.

Can you get more disingenuous?    Its pegged when top debt holders choose to make it pegged at their own whim and nothing else.

If what you say is FACT.... then why not update the asset description, all of the docs on various sites, and bitshares.org to

bitCNY IS A USELESS SHITCOIN PEGGED 0.22:1 TO THE VALUE OF BTS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE


???


Is the best way for lay users to find out about the fact that bitCNY is a cartel controlled scam on some random thread buried among junk promotion of a shitcoin exchange?

bitCNY is the biggest shit stain on BitShares ecosystem and it is the PRINCIPLE REASON why Bitshares is grossly devalued as it exemplifies the inherent corruptness of the current DPOS architecture.

25
I generally support the new UI worker and the team behind it, however I do have one concern:

Something I would like to see, in addition to the offering, is added budget for 6 month commitment - beyond the contract period - for a single developer to perform code review ONLY on community submitted PR's.  This would be only for continuity's sake; in the event that there is another lapse in full "UI dev team" funding.   

Those with control of the github repo generally slow down and do nothing unless they are being funded; which is understandable as they are not paid.  However, that inaction drags down any ability for pro bono work to continue.   Then since there is no pro bono work... we must fund the new "dev team" ...or get nothing.   That negative feedback loop is frustrating and invokes a sense of conflict of interest.

It is untenable to have a buggy UI representing Bitshares with pull requests open by the public in the time lapsing between funding efforts.

I support this worker, but I also support a "no lapse community code review" addendum.



26
General Discussion / Re: ANN: HONEST Market Pegged Assets
« on: March 14, 2020, 03:46:57 pm »
Binance CEX
BTC:USDT
https://cryptowat.ch/markets/binance/btc/usdt/4h


BitShares DEX
HONEST.BTC:HONEST.USD MPA
https://staging.bitshares.org/#/market/HONEST.BTC_HONEST.USD


BitShares DEX
bitBTC:bitUSD
https://staging.bitshares.org/#/market/BTC_USD


all charts are 4h candles FEB 1st to present

Why are HONEST mpa markets holding such a tight peg
and committee controlled bitassets failing so miserably?


bitUSD plutocracy
Code: [Select]
Maximum short squeeze ratio         1010     means force settle 1% under market rate
Force settlement delay              24h      with full day of delay before settlement
Max force settle vol                0.5%     means very little gets force settled per 24h period

HONEST.USD noocracy
Code: [Select]
Maximum short squeeze ratio         1250     force settlement occurs 20% below market rate
Force settlement delay              1h       within 1 hour
Max force settle vol                100%     within 4 hours all bad debt is settled or on the books


27
General Discussion / Re: Hello 👋
« on: March 14, 2020, 02:50:43 pm »
Binance CEX
BTC:USDT
https://cryptowat.ch/markets/binance/btc/usdt/4h


BitShares DEX
HONEST.BTC:HONEST.USD MPA
https://staging.bitshares.org/#/market/HONEST.BTC_HONEST.USD


BitShares DEX
bitBTC:bitUSD
https://staging.bitshares.org/#/market/BTC_USD


all charts are 4h candles FEB 1st to present

bitUSD plutocracy
Code: [Select]
Maximum short squeeze ratio         1010
Force settlement delay              24h
Force settlement offset             1%
Max force settle vol                0.5%

HONEST.USD noocracy
Code: [Select]
Maximum short squeeze ratio         1250
Force settlement delay              4h
Force settlement offset             0%
Max force settle vol                100%

@Dan to discuss changes to core required to enact noocratic governance catch me on telegram @litepresence

28
General Discussion / Re: Suggestion
« on: March 07, 2020, 12:24:18 am »
Suggestion!

Instead of hoarding debt to stuff your mattress with bitfiat,
and crying for changes to the borrowing rules every couple days like a child:

Why not consider only borrowing when you intend to short the market,
then buy back for cheaper and profit like a typical margin trader?

 ???


29
This proposal is ridiculous.

YES.  OMG we agree on something bitasset related!   Mark the day on the calendar!   Festival next year!

...but I'm not sure which is more ridiculous:

increasing from ridiculous 2 to ridiculous 5

or

having the ridiculous notion of "force settlement offset" at all

???

*perplexed*

30
Quote
Total  budget:
   30,600 USD (215,179 CNY)

Please quote additional budget requirements for the same worker, except no restrictions on gateways providers: GDEX, RUDEX, XBTSX, DEEX, etc.

Quote
There is no such need that private owned for-profit companies such as gateways are listing nodes for public access.

The nature of the argument: "gateways should be self funded because they keep all their profits", is no longer relevant with BSIP86.

These are no longer "independent for profit entities"; they are now taxed subjects of state.



If there is to be taxation; a qualification of the inherent power to do so, is that the proceeds of such levy, should provide for the general welfare of the taxed parties.   This should include both listing on the reference UI and access worker-funded public API nodes.

As revenue raised - for the chain - by gateways will increase with their increased traffic.  I propose explicitly excluding gateways from "commercial use".    While current traffic is low, perhaps this means this worker should include a budget for "potential" increase in load handling of gateway traffic; to be return to chain in the event it is not needed.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10