default (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_balance BTS2CV6F52pMnhJeiDF7ZQK8XoX5ejdENM3b
{
  "condition": {
    "asset_id": 0,
    "slate_id": 0,
    "type": "withdraw_signature_type",
    "data": {
      "owner": "BTS9pTBfYkFwmUm46XTaeTLukGDrupobHwzc",
      "memo": null
    }
  },
  "balance": 100000,
  "restricted_owner": null,
  "snapshot_info": null,
  "deposit_date": "2014-11-14T05:27:01",
  "last_update": "2014-12-16T06:16:00"
}
default (unlocked) >>> blockchain_list_address_balances BTS9pTBfYkFwmUm46XTaeTLukGDrupobHwzc
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
!"This balance's condition type doesn't have a true owner.":
    {}
    th_a  balance_record.cpp:30 owners

    {"addr":"BTS9pTBfYkFwmUm46XTaeTLukGDrupobHwzc"}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:2399 get_balances_for_address

    {}
    th_a  common_api_client.cpp:1633 blockchain_list_address_balances

    {"command":"blockchain_list_address_balances"}
    th_a  cli.cpp:579 execute_command
default (unlocked) >>>

---- now at my client

  "blockchain_head_block_num": 1283143,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "9 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-12-17T07:20:20",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "37.83 %",

---- now at bitsharesblocks.com
blockchain_head_block_num -> 1283222
blockchain_average_delegate_participation -> 63.13%

Quote from: lil_jay890 on December 16, 2014, 04:46:18 am

I I think everyone just needs to relax... Obviously the crypto bear market is weighing on everyone. Bp is more of a regular guy trying to target regular people. It would make no sense if he started marketing bts to Joe six pack before 1.0... It would do much more damage if the main marketing push was going on while all these changes and forks are happening. How is bp suppose to constantly explain to people that network shutdowns, rebranding, air drops and that it takes 3 transactions to buy bts and 4 to buy bitusd is normal. U guys were all on board with his marketing strategy earlier and a from what I can tell the plan has been consistent.

I have strong thoughts on what could have been done prior, however, it doesn't help us today.  Nullstreet is pressing forward, BP is meeting with BM, Adam is updating the community and Method-X is requesting coordinating efforts with Adam.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12329.0

Let's start here.

 

Thanks for the feedback clayop, we never tested on android 5.0.
We have a new version coming out, i will test on 5.0.

Thanks xeroc, i was aware of those two restrictions, but i remember BM (some months ago) writing about this.
I don't know if this was implemented or it just product of my imagination....

Btw, in the case of valid_feeds < 51 the new feed is the average price of the last hour right?
(valid_feeds = published less than 24h ago?)

Are the price movement restrictions still apply in the actual version of the market engine?
(i remember about certain percentage change will freeze the market in order to give time to traders to reorganize their orders)

IIRC it's possible and you even get a discount.

Anyway, it's legal if it works. :-) This is a DAC, all of the legalese is coded into the client.

Thanks @pc it worked but i didn't know if delegates were more permissive at this time.

Another related question:

We are setting the transaction fee (for the mobile wallet) at 2.5 Cents (USD) and i don't understand how is calculated in the desktop wallet.

It is based in BTS and priced in USD?

Is 2.5 cents a reasonable default? should we change it?