301
General Discussion / Re: Decentralized Autonomous Charity
« on: April 06, 2014, 07:31:31 pm »
Hmm I would maybe give 30% to charity, maybe 5% to shareholders and 65% to players but I would just call it a normal lottery and advertise the charity element strongly.
Then we can say we give more than regular lotteries to everybody! We give more to charity (and directly to charity not via government which is a big plus), more to players and more to shareholders, all made possible by efficiency savings!
this.
I would add that use of the phrase "political cover" in this context could be interpreted as cynicism.