Coindesk Poll - Most Influential

infovortice2013 · December 15, 2014, 02:02:23 PM

tito Dan Larimer voted +5% :D

sumantso · December 15, 2014, 11:17:42 AM

--- bump ---

hadrian · December 14, 2014, 07:53:30 PM

Daniel Larimer

pseudoscops · December 14, 2014, 05:06:27 PM

Bump! Make sure you vote if you haven't already.

jamesc · December 08, 2014, 11:42:36 PM

Submitted Daniel Larimer!

House · December 08, 2014, 11:37:48 PM

Daniel Larimer 8)

pseudoscops · December 08, 2014, 10:40:32 PM

This is important!

Vote if you haven't done so already 8)

hpenvy · December 06, 2014, 03:57:42 AM

Quote from: joele on December 05, 2014, 02:32:39 PM
This is what I pasted, Daniel Larimer

+5% Let's keep it moving.

joele · December 05, 2014, 02:32:39 PM

This is what I pasted, Daniel Larimer

fuzzy · December 05, 2014, 01:46:37 PM

Quote from: hpenvy on December 05, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
Quote from: charleshoskinson on December 05, 2014, 06:52:18 AM
It's a broken poll. No resistance to Sybil attacks and targeted marketing. Vanity elections yield vanity results.

I wasn't trying to make a statement when I posted the poll, I'm just looking for small marketing opportunities that are easy to perform to add to the massive push on Nullstreet. Takes a few seconds, if people choose to opt out that's fine.

I think the assessment it correct, but it also doesnt matter. We could call the ethereum marketing strategy a "vanity" marketing strategy as there is little of substance accept for a bunch of interviews about the philosophy.

Charles. Your input is appreciated, but can you maybe start occasionally being positive here?

hpenvy · December 05, 2014, 01:19:21 PM

Quote from: charleshoskinson on December 05, 2014, 06:52:18 AM
It's a broken poll. No resistance to Sybil attacks and targeted marketing. Vanity elections yield vanity results.

I wasn't trying to make a statement when I posted the poll, I'm just looking for small marketing opportunities that are easy to perform to add to the massive push on Nullstreet. Takes a few seconds, if people choose to opt out that's fine.

charleshoskinson · December 05, 2014, 06:52:18 AM

It's a broken poll. No resistance to Sybil attacks and targeted marketing. Vanity elections yield vanity results.

WildWex · December 05, 2014, 04:14:42 AM

Daniel Larimer +5% and then some!

bytemaster · December 05, 2014, 12:44:16 AM

Quote from: NewMine on December 05, 2014, 12:24:46 AM
Quote from: bytemaster on December 04, 2014, 10:01:09 PM
Quote from: hrossik on December 04, 2014, 09:46:51 PM
Quote from: NewMine on December 04, 2014, 08:57:12 PM
"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

:) I agree that this is exactly the case... +5%

Well in this particular case you cannot even gauge the participation.
The gauge of participation in any election can only be determined after the votes are cast and quantified.

Unless you use VOTE in which case you have continuous gauge of rate of voting.

NewMine · December 05, 2014, 12:24:46 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on December 04, 2014, 10:01:09 PM
Quote from: hrossik on December 04, 2014, 09:46:51 PM
Quote from: NewMine on December 04, 2014, 08:57:12 PM
"My personal opinion is that you should never vote in a system that is rigged/unprovable on the principle that your "vote" may or may not actually be counted but your participation is certainly counted on to give the result legitimacy."- can't remember who said this, but it applies here.

:) I agree that this is exactly the case... +5%

Well in this particular case you cannot even gauge the participation.

The gauge of participation in any election can only be determined after the votes are cast and quantified.

Coindesk Poll - Most Influential

sumantso

charleshoskinson