Dual XEON L5639 @ 2.13G / 16GB 23 threads yvg1900-M7h-linux64-corei7sse4-512M,  after fine tuning complete, get 316CPM
AMD FX6200 @ 3.8G / 16GB 5 threads yvg1900-M7h-linux64-bulldozerv1-512M,  after fine tuning complete, get around 110CPM
AMD FX8350 @ 4.0G / 16GB 7 threads yvg1900-M7h-linux64-bulldozerv1-512M,  after fine tuning complete, get around 130CPM

Quote from: daem0n on December 19, 2013, 05:23:25 PM
Core i7 2600K @ 4.2Ghz/8Gb   253   8 threads corei7avx-512m -F 0

that's less than I get on 2600K with modified ptsminer

does memory quality make a difference?

great work!
Can you add the proxy support for jhProtominer?

If this is for different t settings, then this is consistent with the concept. If it selects different AVs for same setup, CPM shall be very very close for those AVs.

yvg1900

Quote from: yvg1900 on December 19, 2013, 10:22:08 PM
What was the final AV after finetuning swithced to COMPLETED?

yvg1900

sometimes 5 sometimes 29

[email protected] 512M t4 F5 about 250cpm
[email protected] 512M t8 F29 about 278cpm

Quote from: yvg1900 on December 19, 2013, 10:22:08 PM
What was the final AV after finetuning swithced to COMPLETED?

yvg1900

Now - Core i7 2600K @ 4.2Ghz/8Gb   258   8 threads corei7avx-512m -F 0

e=0.0439
AV=5

What was the final AV after finetuning swithced to COMPLETED?

yvg1900

Core i7 2600K @ 4.2Ghz/8Gb   253   8 threads corei7avx-512m -F 0

figured i would try this, but, wow, this   miner is horrid

the pool in Austria gets frequent disconnects from 5 different hosts, the miner spends much time in 'warmup' mode, any extra speed is wasted paying to someone else

going through and fixing everything, lol

collisions/min: 224.8938, warmup; Shares found: 12, submitted 12, accepted 12

collisions/min: 233.0360, warmup; Shares found: 21, submitted 21, accepted 21

collisions/min: 192.7183, e=1.2169; Shares found: 24, submitted 24, accepted 21
  Will mine 13 more seconds for miner developers to support development of the next version

gg

oh, enjoy my .05 pts that i can never withdraw

it's like i've been violated, the chicanery and swindling that's going on on this pool + miner,  scary shit

Quote from: shshya on December 16, 2013, 05:47:32 AM

Quote from: mmao on December 16, 2013, 04:05:14 AM
E3-1230V2, win64,    -t 8 -m512 -F 0
220cpm

which version of jhprotominer are you running?

the newest one, jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h-win64-corei7avx,
I just had a look at the output, the fine tuning is completed, and the speed is 241cpm:

collisions/min: 241.5380, e=0.1800; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6493
collisions/min: 241.5375, e=0.1793; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6538
collisions/min: 241.5270, e=0.1785; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6569
collisions/min: 241.5415, e=0.1773; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6582
collisions/min: 241.5610, e=0.1769; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6510
collisions/min: 241.5455, e=0.1756; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6911
collisions/min: 241.5299, e=0.1739; Shares found: 200, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6555
Share found!
collisions/min: 241.5093, e=0.1720; Shares found: 201, submitted 200, accepted 1
97; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6675
collisions/min: 241.5088, e=0.1698; Shares found: 201, submitted 201, accepted 1
98; fine tuning: COMPLETE, AV=29, LRT=6593


Quote from: mmao on December 16, 2013, 04:05:14 AM
E3-1230V2, win64,    -t 8 -m512 -F 0
220cpm

which version of jhprotominer are you running?

E3-1230V2, win64,    -t 8 -m512 -F 0
220cpm

Quote from: tyeken8 on November 14, 2013, 12:20:09 PM

Quote from: donschoe on November 13, 2013, 08:10:32 PM
Amazon AWS cc2.8xlarge, 32 Threads, 279 cpm jhProtominer -m512
Amazon AWS cc2.8xlarge, 32 Threads, 309 cpm ptsminer 0.5 based on jh's

cc2.8xlarge, dual Xeon E5-2670, 847 cpm jhProtominer-yvg1900 32Threads * 1024MB

Update: updated miner, ~900cpm now.
Update: updated miner again , ~955cpm now.

How are you getting that much?  I'm only getting about 440c/m with the cc2.8xlarge servers.  I'm using the core2-1024m miner too..

Quote from: tyeken8 on November 14, 2013, 12:20:09 PM

Quote from: donschoe on November 13, 2013, 08:10:32 PM
Amazon AWS cc2.8xlarge, 32 Threads, 279 cpm jhProtominer -m512
Amazon AWS cc2.8xlarge, 32 Threads, 309 cpm ptsminer 0.5 based on jh's

cc2.8xlarge, dual Xeon E5-2670, 847 cpm jhProtominer-yvg1900 32Threads * 1024MB

Update: updated miner, ~900cpm now.
Update: updated miner again , ~955cpm now.
Update: updated miner again , ~985cpm now.

On my other machine. single Xeon E3-1230 V3, 8Threads * 1024MB. 336 cpm

CPU Model/RAM  -  Collisions per minute  -  Miner settings
iMac Core i5 680 @ 3.6Ghz/8Gb   61   4 threads –m512
AWS c.3.4large Xeon E5-2680 @2.7Ghz/30Gb 225 4 threads -m512
Azure ExtraLarge AMD 4171 @ 2Ghz/14Gb 110 4 threads -512

Needless to say, Azure are the worst, however with 20 core, you can run 2 ExtraLarge's and a Large.  I'm currently getting about 280 c/ms combined