Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?

Started by gordonhucn, January 13, 2015, 07:50:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sudo

Quote from: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:23:54 PM
Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 AM
hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet


+5% +5% awesome

xeroc

Quote from: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:23:54 PM
Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 AM
hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet
sweet .. +5%!!

gordonhucn

Quote from: BTServiceGroup on January 13, 2015, 10:41:16 AM
Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 AM
hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

hint : this guy maybe earning 10X than the protocol is providing .

:) I am looking forward to such a day.

gordonhucn

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 AM
hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet

BTServiceGroup

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 AM
hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

hint : this guy maybe earning 10X than the protocol is providing .

xeroc


cn-members

BTS中文区发言人公共账号,帮助社区有效沟通与交流。
Chinese Community Spokesman Account,to help the effective communication between Chinese and other members of the community.We're not translators to do regular translations , but will help with vital ones as we see fit and available at that time.

gordonhucn

CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) is very suitable to build a desktop application with all chrome browser features, it is a C++ lib, supports windows/linux/mac platforms.
The performance of CEF based application is quite the same as Chrome itself

Project home
https://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/

Downloads
http://cefbuilds.com/

Documents
http://magpcss.org/ceforum/apidocs3/

A simple demo is provided in the downloaded package, in folder "cefsimple", it looks quite simple and easy to start with.