Quote from: Shentist on April 22, 2015, 06:37:41 PM
we could also something do like this:

if we can only execute a part, the rest will get a limit order with an possible execution at the same price the first part got transfered.

The user can only cancel this order through his BitShares account

That would work for the bitshares side, but for bitcoin, it's more difficult because there is no way to prove ownership of the orders.

I think your original idea of setting a refund address by transaction memo is the best way :)

we could also something do like this:

if we can only execute a part, the rest will get a limit order with an possible execution at the same price the first part got transfered.

The user can only cancel this order through his BitShares account

Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2015, 09:29:13 AM
Thanks Paul. But if I send always lower amounts than the max amounts shown i.e. 0.1 BTC less everytime there shouldn't be a problem with any refund right? And if for some reason something happens I could always contact you and we can fix this right?

As long as nothing else goes wrong, you should be ok :)

Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2015, 09:29:13 AM

Quote from: monsterer on April 22, 2015, 08:41:38 AM

Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2015, 06:44:45 AM
I am interested about this since I am planning to send some BTC from bitstamp and I know some others friends are going to do the same. Will this be a problem? In case of a problem we can always pm you and you look at this right? For us if we download the whole bitcoin wallet it will take at least 3 days to synch...We are all in BTS for quite some time now...

Be careful if you do this - if you send over the maximum transaction size, the transaction will get refunded to bitstamp, not to you.

I am planning to implement a proper refund address setting as per shentist's sugguestion, but for now, please take care when you send :)

Thanks Paul. But if I send always lower amounts than the max amounts shown i.e. 0.1 BTC less everytime there shouldn't be a problem with any refund right? And if for some reason something happens I could always contact you and we can fix this right?

It will be troublesome, contacting exchanger and verifying addresses to the max manually, exchanger will hate you for this. :D

Quote from: monsterer on April 22, 2015, 08:41:38 AM

Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2015, 06:44:45 AM
I am interested about this since I am planning to send some BTC from bitstamp and I know some others friends are going to do the same. Will this be a problem? In case of a problem we can always pm you and you look at this right? For us if we download the whole bitcoin wallet it will take at least 3 days to synch...We are all in BTS for quite some time now...

Be careful if you do this - if you send over the maximum transaction size, the transaction will get refunded to bitstamp, not to you.

I am planning to implement a proper refund address setting as per shentist's sugguestion, but for now, please take care when you send :)

Thanks Paul. But if I send always lower amounts than the max amounts shown i.e. 0.1 BTC less everytime there shouldn't be a problem with any refund right? And if for some reason something happens I could always contact you and we can fix this right?

If there is BTC refund, transfer small amount to customer Bitshares account with memo that they have BTC refund and a short URL that redirect to How To Refund page in your website.
The How to Refund page explain how to send small amount to your Bitshares account with Bitcoin address in the memo, and with example.

or compress the message in the memo on how to get the refund.

Quote from: favdesu on April 22, 2015, 08:48:57 AM
I'd like to see an optional option to associate a bts id with a fixed bitcoin adr for deposit / refund

I don't think this is possible for deposit, but it certainly is for refund. For deposit, the address is unique to your market requirements, so we can identify you as a trader.

I'd like to see an optional option to associate a bts id with a fixed bitcoin adr for deposit / refund

Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2015, 06:44:45 AM
I am interested about this since I am planning to send some BTC from bitstamp and I know some others friends are going to do the same. Will this be a problem? In case of a problem we can always pm you and you look at this right? For us if we download the whole bitcoin wallet it will take at least 3 days to synch...We are all in BTS for quite some time now...

Be careful if you do this - if you send over the maximum transaction size, the transaction will get refunded to bitstamp, not to you.

I am planning to implement a proper refund address setting as per shentist's sugguestion, but for now, please take care when you send :)

I am interested about this since I am planning to send some BTC from bitstamp and I know some others friends are going to do the same. Will this be a problem? In case of a problem we can always pm you and you look at this right? For us if we download the whole bitcoin wallet it will take at least 3 days to synch...We are all in BTS for quite some time now...

Quote from: Pheonike on April 21, 2015, 08:54:50 PM

How about a bitcoin mixing service.

I thought that was illegal under some jurisdictions, though it could certainly attract a great number of bitcoin users and even open the door for bitAssets into the deep web, however I think that's an approach some don't agree with.

How about a bitcoin mixing service.

Cool, the core devs are thinking 2 steps ahead as usual ;D

Quote from: speedy on April 21, 2015, 08:45:20 PM
Look what happens when I click the Deposit page on Bter.com, we need a page like this in the web-wallet:



Bter generated a BTC deposit address its user. Metaexchange's API could generate a deposit address for the web-wallet user, and he wouldnt even have to know hes using Metaexchange.

Im sure everything Im saying is obvious but its good to refresh where our priorities should be.

hi speedy,

we already wanted it, but it is not on us, to get it into the wallets. We agreed with moonstone and limewallet to do it, and it seems the core devs will start as well to get us and blocktrades integrated.

Look what happens when I click the Deposit page on Bter.com, we need a page like this in the web-wallet:



Bter generated a BTC deposit address its user. Metaexchange's API could generate a deposit address for the web-wallet user, and he wouldnt even have to know hes using Metaexchange.

Im sure everything Im saying is obvious but its good to refresh where our priorities should be.