I'm willing!

Quote from: fav on September 06, 2015, 07:04:53 AM
Can we test the referral system prior to the release?

+5%

Can we test the referral system prior to the release?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok7WusA_1G8  :)

Donor:

"I"

Quote from: nethyb on September 06, 2015, 04:48:50 AM
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.

Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.

Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html

If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...

This is cool!  Yes, for those who wish to contribute $$$ instead of time, please do so.  We can fund this (both in $$$ and effort/time) and achieve a massive blast (near 100K TPS hopefully) via multiple nodes in LAN and then over the Internet.  Donors and volunteers, please SAY I.

Quote from: cube on September 06, 2015, 03:21:56 AM
I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed!   +5%

How about all the delegates combine force to do a 'blasting' in order to max out the Internet-based transaction.  The devs can possibly do their LAN test since they have the number of computers and a fast gigabit local area network.  We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.

How about that, guys?  If you are keen, please SAY IT!

Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 AM

Quote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 AM

Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 AM

Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 AM

Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 AM

Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 AM

Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 PM
When Tony says buy you buy.

A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age.  :)

Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 PM

Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 PM
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.

I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects

Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out.  This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.

good idea    lan   Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks

@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).

Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have  +5% +5% +5%

Agreed!!

Good idea.  No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...

:)

I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.

Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.

Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html

If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...

Quote from: cube on September 06, 2015, 03:34:33 AM

Quote from: wuyanren on September 06, 2015, 03:31:04 AM
I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time

There is nothing to stop anyone of us from joining the test net.  All are welcome!

Check out https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.0.html and  https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18312.0.html.

谢谢

Quote from: wuyanren on September 06, 2015, 03:31:04 AM
I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time

There is nothing to stop anyone of us from joining the test net.  All are welcome!

Check out https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.0.html and  https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18312.0.html.

I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time

Quote from: lakerta06 on September 05, 2015, 10:25:41 PM

Quote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 12:28:06 PM

Quote from: lakerta06 on September 05, 2015, 12:21:04 PM

Quote from: wuyanren on September 05, 2015, 11:09:49 AM
I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publish

and they are?

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues  You can see it here.

there are only 3 bugs, 2 of them being labeled high-priority. I wouldn't say "a lot of problems" but  is not my call anyways.

sorry，I don't understand

I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed!   +5%

How about all the delegates combine force to do a 'blasting' in order to max out the Internet-based transaction.  The devs can possibly do their LAN test since they have the number of computers and a fast gigabit local area network.  We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.

How about that, guys?  If you are keen, please SAY IT!

Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 AM

Quote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 AM

Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 AM

Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 AM

Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 AM

Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 AM

Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 PM
When Tony says buy you buy.

A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age.  :)

Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 PM

Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 PM
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.

I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects

Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out.  This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.

good idea    lan   Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks

@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).

Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have  +5% +5% +5%

Agreed!!

Good idea.  No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...

:)

Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 AM
Good idea.  No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...

:)

I smell brownies again!

Quote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 AM

Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 AM

Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 AM

Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 AM

Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 AM

Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 PM
When Tony says buy you buy.

A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age.  :)

Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 PM

Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 PM
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.

I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects

Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out.  This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.

good idea    lan   Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks

@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).

Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have  +5% +5% +5%

Agreed!!

Good idea.  No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...

:)

Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 AM

Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 AM

Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 AM

Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 AM

Quote from: jsidhu on September 04, 2015, 10:56:35 PM
When Tony says buy you buy.

A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age.  :)

Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 PM

Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 PM
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.

I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects

Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out.  This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.

good idea    lan   Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks

@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).

Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have  +5% +5% +5%

Agreed!!