Quote from: NaN on February 10, 2014, 04:55:15 AM
That's a missing library search path. execute the following command: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH. After that start the miner.
EDIT: Could you use the address Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz if you wanna mine for me?

and how set GPU clock,GPU fans in linux?

why i juet 1 card work,can,t find the other cards?

yes i send to Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz

That's a missing library search path. execute the following command: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH. After that start the miner.
EDIT: Could you use the address Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz if you wanna mine for me?

ub linux


btc@btc-desktop:~$ cd /home/desktop/pts
btc@btc-desktop:~/desktop/pts$ ./clpts PtLx9kDLTXtR1ae3u7naXLPeGjjHZ1PGoR -t 0
./clpts: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.55.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory



what's problem about it?

I can't thank you enough NaN for the incredible miner + revisions!
My current rig has 4 x MSI R9 290, running Windows 8.1 and I'm
currently seeing 11821 c/m (gpu @ 1100 MHz, mem @ 1250 MHz,
power limit @ -15%). All my 290's run at 68C to 71C with fan @ 80%.

Now the above numbers are with just a single GPU thread. When I open
another cmd window and fire up the same exact clpts as the first window
it works, though at a little less than half of the first thread. I'm currently
seeing 10400 c/m in the first thread and 4600 c/m in the second thread.

I decided to kill both threads and start them at the same time and now I
can see that both are running the same c/m which together equal the same
c/m speed as a single thread. I was guessing (hoping) that utilizing the extra
memory on the gpus would help (via more threads) but it doesn't. Just want
to throw that out and ask others to not be too harsh on me... I'm new to this
mining thing :-)

Again NaN, I can't thank you enough!!!

Quote from: Malfunction on February 09, 2014, 10:20:31 PM
Figured I'd register to share my experience with 7850, heads up to the dev if anything :)

1.2 is running @ ~870 c/m sometimes up to 900

1.4 is maxing out at 390

Thanks for a cool piece of software !

Ok, going to eat my hat here. It's now up to 1080 c/m. Though it did take about 2 hours to "accelerate". 

Hello

is it normal ? Gigabyte R9 280X X4 get 10000-11000col/M for ver 0.2.2

Thank you

ASUS R9-290X 1050 core.. default RAM.. 3150 col/m (+28% from 2450 col/m)! catalyst 13.251-131206a-165817C-ATI over windows 7 64 bit.. over XEON overclocked 35% (I know it does not matter.. lol).

To those using the new versions (where we just got a 25% or better boost for most it seems)... the miner was already leaps ahead of others, and this rockets it even further... I think it would be a nice gesture to donate an entire day or large portion to him for his efforts...

I suggest we have a mine for NaN day...

please message him for the best address to donate to if you do, as I just did 1.516 to him, he should update the readme and miner screen, just a friendly reminder here for him to update those heh ;)

Quote from: NaN on February 10, 2014, 02:08:25 AM

Quote from: funtik on February 10, 2014, 01:57:54 AM
if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?

You have to type -t 0,1,2,3,4,5. Perhaps I shall introduce something like -t 0-5 in the next release...

the readme file seems pretty straight forward, maybe see how well people of other languages interpret the examples clearly or not, I know sometimes things translate weird to me but are basic to those who speak it... but showing the whole command line seems to give enough to guess at to make things work. I always appreciate less options (when it comes to two ways to do the same one thing), means less things I must try to get it right.

Quote from: funtik on February 10, 2014, 01:57:54 AM
if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?

You have to type -t 0,1,2,3,4,5. Perhaps I shall introduce something like -t 0-5 in the next release...

if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?

Quote from: NaN on February 09, 2014, 07:33:15 PM
R9 R290, Catalyst 13.12, Powertune +20%, GPU@1025MHz and RAM@1250MHz with Linux-v0.1.4 running -a 0, two threads per GPU and no other load. So far, no one was able to reproduce this in Windows but it should be possible because even a 280X easily hits more than 2700cpm. Still wondering because yesterday a user with 2 R9 290X reported only about 6100 cpm.

W7-64-catalyst13.12-clpts0.1.4 (-a 0 or 2) on a 290X / 1160 core / 1475 memory
3479 cpm

How many Protoshares will you make per day with an and 290x?

7990: 3540cpm to 4480cpm = +27%,  algo 1&3 about the same
7850: 780cpm to 1070cpm = +37%  algo 1&3 about the same

wow!

Quote from: NaN on February 09, 2014, 07:33:15 PM
R9 R290, Catalyst 13.12, Powertune +20%, GPU@1025MHz and RAM@1250MHz with Linux-v0.1.4 running -a 0, two threads per GPU and no other load. So far, no one was able to reproduce this in Windows but it should be possible because even a 280X easily hits more than 2700cpm. Still wondering because yesterday a user with 2 R9 290X reported only about 6100 cpm.

I tried two threads per GPU and still only managed ~6100 with 2x R9 290X @ 1040MHz/1500Mhz