Author Topic: Proposal: set up one mechanism to manage the New Assets registration  (Read 3403 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline emailtooaj

Thing is, after each asset is registered the BTS price to create the next asset goes up. That alone should filter out any non-serious or scam assets from flooding the asset list, as the cost may not be worth it??
Xeroc is correct IMO by sorting the market via volume and/or market cap, maybe only show the top 15 or 10?
That way only the good ones stay visible and if someone wants to meander around to investigate other potential offerings they can.

I also thought that maybe voting in a new asset would be the way to go, but I think that would add undue workload on both the end user and delegates.
Sound Editor of Beyondbitcoin Hangouts. Listen to latest here - https://beyondbitcoin.org support the Hangouts! BTS Tri-Fold Brochure https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15169.0.html
Tip BROWNIE.PTS to EMAILTOOAJ

Offline Overthetop

Too many rules, these investors are not kids, the community is not the guardian for their investment.

all right  then ,let us see the asset market becomes to a refuse landfill.

 :)

BTW, My proposal is not about we must vote out the formal assets, just want to remind the community find someway to  manage the assets market.

Is this an excessive demand?

Any better solution /idea is welcome here.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2014, 04:36:04 am by Overthetop »
个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613

Offline joele

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
    • View Profile
Too many rules, these investors are not kids, the community is not the guardian for their investment.

Offline cn-members

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
    • View Profile
BTS中文区发言人公共账号,帮助社区有效沟通与交流。
Chinese Community Spokesman Account,to help the effective communication between Chinese and other members of the community.We're not translators to do regular translations , but will help with vital ones as we see fit and available at that time.

Offline Overthetop

BUMP... for the better asset management in BTS..

个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613

Offline Overthetop

At least ,we can add some obvious tabs or properties to the assets to make the distinction .

Such as bitUSD against bltUSD...

Such as VOLUME .. and/or number of issued shares .. also the issuer is called MARKET!!! not a account name

Yes
个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
At least ,we can add some obvious tabs or properties to the assets to make the distinction .

Such as bitUSD against bltUSD...

Such as VOLUME .. and/or number of issued shares .. also the issuer is called MARKET!!! not a account name

Offline Overthetop

I wouldn't want to investigate and vote for hundreds of assets ..

But I agree that it already is a little messy ... However, we can list the markets according to the VOLUME and thus scam markets will be at the end (hopefully) ...
You cannot protect every individual from bad investment decisions :(

At least ,we can add some obvious tabs or properties to the assets to make the distinction .

Such as bitUSD against bltUSD...
个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
I wouldn't want to investigate and vote for hundreds of assets ..

But I agree that it already is a little messy ... However, we can list the markets according to the VOLUME and thus scam markets will be at the end (hopefully) ...
You cannot protect every individual from bad investment decisions :(

Offline Overthetop

There are lots of assets in the market now , and the big part of them were registrated just by rush, we can see there would be more if we let it go.

This is no good for the whole thing.

I propose  setting up one mechanism to manage the registration process of New Assets.

How about this way :

1. all of the new assets can be registered as an Tentative Assets , and then ,the assets enter into their review period,maybe several months.

2. when the review period comes to an end , the assets need to be checked and voted by the whole community.

3. if the assets surpass the criticality votes ,the system upgrades them as Formal Assets. if not ,then hang-up the assets or undercarriages the assets directly.

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: November 13, 2014, 04:13:37 pm by Overthetop »
个人微博账号: Overthetop_万里晴空
“块链创新与创业”交流群: 330378613