to DPOSHUB and wallet notifications.
I think per-job worker funding is a great way to overcome voter apathy. Periodic decision making on how to fund DAC's growth ( = own stake growth) tends to prompt awareness and commitment also on witness and delegate choosing.
Beside that, as another way to encourage regular users to become active users or even stakers (while boosting DPOS distribution/resilence), I'd love to debate arround a -non stake size dependant- incentive to vote.
Just to try starting a brainstorm, what about something like a cyclic, fixed and delayed reward, splitted between those voters whose choosen witnesses maintained the best block production averages in the next (or N subsequent) cycles.
I think of withesses because they have protocol verifiable metrics. Might be a mess to try rewarding responsible worker and delegate votes, but same as before, a common economic incentive to vote could help to an overall commitment and also improve user/staker adoption.
It might be positive for the whole network to improve active participation from users that feel they have not enough stake to influence on decisions, or the ones who think the potencial revenue from small stakes are not worth the effort to be active on the network.
That said, I'm all for feature freeze until graphene is ready, it seems to me just a good thing to keep reserching on.
What do you think?