Author Topic: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization  (Read 4389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1828
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« on: July 29, 2016, 03:21:21 pm »
smartcoin economy and current bitCNY status

smartcoin is not only stable currency, but also financial leverage tool.

shorters use this leverage tool to fulfill financial needs by borrowing smartcoins from system, for bitCNY, the 1% force settlement offset and 0.5% force settle volume limit greatly reduce the shorters' worry of being force settled, even their debt position are force settled, they always have big chance to buy back BTS from market without loss. in summary, this setting make the user experience of the leverage tool much better than before, that is why bitCNY supply doubled in 5 weeks. 

then is bitCNY devalued by 1%? things are not simple, now bitCNY express its value by trading, or by withdrawing to fiat CNY, in both ways it is not devalued, however in both ways transwiser play an important role. this lead to another question - does bitCNY's value depend on transwiser's service?

in my opinion in smartcoin economy gateways and market makers are must and play important role, they help exact pegging and provide liquidity, however, this is not to say that the smartcoins' value depend on their service, we can also say it's smartcoins' own value make the gateway and market making service possible.

force settlement should not be seen as a common value express, it is "last resort", I don't think we can expect merchants to accept smartcoins just because of the 100% force settlement, a gateway service is always needed for merchants to accept smartcoins.

bitCNY now has a supply of 1.57M, in my view the supply may reach 5M at the end of this year, frankly speaking, as a gateway transwiser now face bigger chanllenge than before, now most bitCNY finally come to transwiser as an exit but seldom people buy bitCNY from transwiser, to balance the liquidity flow, transwiser need to try to make bitCNY trading base for more markets in DEX, and also need to try to build something like CNY-USD exchange channel with the help of bitCNY,bitUSD/USDT.

bitUSD's current status and change proposal

generally speaking, bitUSD is now in low supply(about 115k), low trading volume and bad pegging(bitUSD always worth 5~10% higher than fiat USD)

I am not sure why things are like this, but in the past we do not have a good channel to do bitUSD/fiat USD conversion, now thanks to OpenLedger's work, we now have OPEN.USDT to play the role of bridging bitUSD and fiat USD, now any market maker can do more in bitUSD market to provide liquidity and help exact pegging, but at that stage the same problem that has puzzled bitCNY ecosystem will also appear here - how to encourage shorters to generate more bitUSD?

here I propose the same solution to bitUSD as had applied to bitCNY - change the force settlement offset to 1% and max hourly force settle volume to 0.5%, currently the two parameter values for bitUSD are 0% and 20%.

The force settlement offset can be seen as a service fee that holder pay to the settled shorter at the time of force settlement. The offset need to be a proper value that can balance the risk of holders and shorters. A 0 offset is not reasonable enough as in common financial logic the collateral should not be force settled without any compensation if the collateral price does not fall below the margin call price. On the other hand, if the offset is set too high, force settlement will be unfeasible as "last resort" for value express. another parameter -  the max hourly force settle volume -  should be low enough to prevent sudden settlement to force shorters out quickly. experience in bitCNY shows the 1% offset and 0.5% max hourly force settle volume are comparatively reasonable combination.

this poll is to collect opinions from community, next, similarly, BSIP and maybe also worker proposals will be created, and finally if there are enough support, a committee proposal will be created to implement the change.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 09:30:27 am by bitcrab »
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline ripplexiaoshan

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: jademont
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2016, 04:19:24 pm »
support!
BTS committee member:jademont

Offline BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2016, 04:46:46 pm »
I support this. However, I think I would prefer to see this simply become the standard across the board for all community run bitassets instead of spinning up the same process on every single one.

It appears to be clear that the economics and incentives are better aligned and it doesn't make a different from one bitasset to another.

This should be considered across the board.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline Moon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
    • View Profile
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2016, 02:18:09 am »
i support  +5%

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1828
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2016, 03:51:47 am »
I support this. However, I think I would prefer to see this simply become the standard across the board for all community run bitassets instead of spinning up the same process on every single one.

It appears to be clear that the economics and incentives are better aligned and it doesn't make a different from one bitasset to another.

This should be considered across the board.

at least I think in future we can apply the change to other smartcoins in groups, not one by one.
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2016, 10:21:46 am »
Apply it for all committee coins now. Change the poll title.

Offline pc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1530
    • View Profile
    • Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko?
  • BitShares: cyrano
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2016, 03:05:52 pm »
I object. I'm currently holding ~4,500 BitUSD. I would be directly damaged from this proposal.

I have already stated that I perceive the modification of an explicit guarantee as robbery.

I will consider legal action against any committee members who vote for such a proposal. I will also consider legal action against any shareholders who vote for such committee members.
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 http://bitcoin.quisquis.de

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1828
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2016, 04:00:32 pm »
I object. I'm currently holding ~4,500 BitUSD. I would be directly damaged from this proposal.

I have already stated that I perceive the modification of an explicit guarantee as robbery.

I will consider legal action against any committee members who vote for such a proposal. I will also consider legal action against any shareholders who vote for such committee members.

interesting.

to avoid the "damage", you can force settle before the change apply.

or if you like, transwiser can pay you 4500 OPEN.USDT to buy the 4500 bitUSD.

I don't think you are guaranteed more.

in BSIP#16 there is an answer to this question that can be referenced: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0016.md

Does this proposal break a promise?

Yes, but maybe not! There were promises made that bitassets can be settled at any time at the fair price (price feed). With this proposal, we ask for a percentage fee for the settlement service. This can be interpreted as breaking a promise while it could also be interpreted as a change in fee schedule: "Settlements are free for the first few months, after that they are 1%".

most of the community now understand the necessity and importance of this change, someone even propose to apply the change to all the smartcoins, why resist such a beneficial improvement just because of your little "benefit"?

I cannot imagine that this change can be stopped by your threat.


« Last Edit: July 31, 2016, 12:58:21 am by bitcrab »
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline yvv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • View Profile
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2016, 05:27:44 pm »
I object. I'm currently holding ~4,500 BitUSD. I would be directly damaged from this proposal.

I have already stated that I perceive the modification of an explicit guarantee as robbery.

I will consider legal action against any committee members who vote for such a proposal. I will also consider legal action against any shareholders who vote for such committee members.

Yeah, right, good luck with that. There are no signatures of no committee members and no shareholders under no promises. Everybody is well informed that fee schedule and other terms may be changed by votes of shareholders. Calling this a robbery is really being an ass. You have several ways to cash out your bitUSD with no loss at any moment.

Offline bitsharesbrazil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2016, 02:48:01 am »
yes for bitcrab.....

bitcrab think carefully about liquidity proposal those guys made at other topic....maybe give them an alternative....regards.
bitcointalk ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.0
chat, post, promote it!!!!!!!! Stan help to improve OP!

Offline EstefanTT

Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2016, 09:50:18 pm »
Apply it for all committee coins now. Change the poll title.
This ^


Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Bit20, the cryptocurrency index fund http://www.bittwenty.com
(BitShares French ConneXion - www.bitsharesfcx.com)

Offline Akado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2752
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: akado
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #11 on: August 01, 2016, 12:39:08 am »
I object. I'm currently holding ~4,500 BitUSD. I would be directly damaged from this proposal.

I have already stated that I perceive the modification of an explicit guarantee as robbery.

I will consider legal action against any committee members who vote for such a proposal. I will also consider legal action against any shareholders who vote for such committee members.

So now everyone start's doing that each time a parameter is changed. How can you even call BitShares decentralized after saying that.

Every paramater is subject to change, there are no guarantees. And to for that to happen committee who were previously elected with the most votes need to approve it.

I believe by using the technology you're already bound to this, the same way when you visit a website you automatically accept giving information on your cookies.

If bitcoin forks you're going to seek legal action against miners?

Plus, doing it on members who support those committee members? LOL. Even if there was any guarantee of something, which there isn't and every parameter is subject to change - which, by the way, is why they are called "parameters" -  what can be seen as a bad option to you might not be for others. Opinions are relative and you can't force yours on others. That's just stupid.

Even if it was something hardcoded, the community could always fork and change and you would have the option to have it your way on your chain. That doesn't mean the majority and liquidity will be on your side and you can't force ppl to do so.

Good luck.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 12:48:51 am by Akado »
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1828
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2016, 06:58:27 am »
issue for BSIP created: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/14, [member=120]xeroc[/member] could you please check and convert to BSIP?
Email:bitcrab@qq.com

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12914
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2016, 08:55:06 am »
IMHO we should postpone this for quite a bit ..
The CNY modifications are only active for a few weeks and I don't feel the need to modify bitUSD just now.
I'd like to see CNY become more prominent across the whole crypto space .. Only after that happend and people won't use bitUSD because of the 1% difference in settlement, then I think we can start discussing this again.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline llildur

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: poll for bitUSD parameter optimization
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2016, 09:08:36 am »
IMHO we should postpone this for quite a bit ..
The CNY modifications are only active for a few weeks and I don't feel the need to modify bitUSD just now.
I'd like to see CNY become more prominent across the whole crypto space .. Only after that happend and people won't use bitUSD because of the 1% difference in settlement, then I think we can start discussing this again.

 +5% +5%