Author Topic: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd  (Read 14636 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #90 on: October 03, 2020, 07:34:50 pm »

公会搞新链时说好给他 500 万新币。当然,后来给没给、他要没要我不清楚。

有人建议我把这事澄清一下。

可能公会确实(还)没给他币。
公会的信用,怎么说呢,空投当天改空投规则的事也是实实在在发生了的。
公会以后会怎么做,谁也不清楚。
特别是,为了打我的脸,就不给他了,也正常。

这个500万具体是什么事情呢?
公会的正式公告 https://btsgh.com/?p=365 里有了一句“公会合作盟友将获得 500 万 NBS 的奖励”,没有明说给谁,很巧妙是吧。
但我看过一个草稿,里面写的是“公会合作盟友bdex将获得 500 万 NBS ”。
信不信由你。

至于为什么这位是公会合作盟友?因为 4.0 版本生效后这位盟友拿着你 alt 代理的票,和公会一起,投上了一大批试图分叉、其他什么贡献都没有的见证人(包括星在飘都跑了好几个见证人,后来他的主马甲 baidu 被揪出来了后有没有换新马甲我不清楚)。




再说一句,我为什么说公会试图在8月20号制造分叉(针对有人一直纠结于说公会并不想分叉)。
因为实际上这是个技术事实 —— 不同见证人运行不同版本、互不兼容的节点,就会出现分叉。
(我个人并不反对有实力的团队进行分叉,只要能保证原链稳定运行)。

看看这个通知 https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32560.0
威胁所有见证人在 8月20号前运行公会的“补丁”版本,不运行就撤票,没有足够人支持就自己跑见证人,这不是分叉是什么?后来也确实这么做了,撤了一批人,新上了一批人。只是最后关头,这些上去的见证人还是跑了原版代码。
我就奇怪了,既然还是跑原版代码,搞这么大声势干什么?
新上的见证人,除了要分一部分工资给公会上贡,对社区、对系统做了什么贡献?占着位置,甚至连个喂价都喂不好。哦,有些人根本就没喂。反正有票,管他呢。
« Last Edit: October 03, 2020, 07:46:02 pm by abit »
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #91 on: October 03, 2020, 10:37:18 pm »
seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.

Offline xixi002020

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #92 on: October 04, 2020, 01:51:31 am »
seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.

是有这么回事,不是流言蜚语,不信你完全不知情,为虎作伥罢了。
锁喂价确实是abit提出来的,只是是临时提出的,锁多久,什么时候解锁,等等...都没有,没有完整的方案。 这一点abit是有责任的。
当然以前的投票机制 即使有完整方案  能不能正常执行另说.............
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 01:57:38 am by xixi002020 »

Offline Ammar Yousef (ioBanker)

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #93 on: October 04, 2020, 05:23:43 am »
seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.

He will stay don't worry; he cannot trust NBS airport to run his free database and application server.

His CEX orderbook is not even 1% of daily volume https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares/markets and his harassments to BitShares community wouldn't be justified nor forgiven.
Be part of the change and set bitshares-vision as your proxy!
Committee account: iobanker-core
Ammar Yousef - CEO @ ioBanker OÜ

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #94 on: October 04, 2020, 07:13:51 am »
seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.
It's not gossip but public info.
You're free to choose to ignore them anyway, it is called "Selective blindness" (选择性失明).
Wish you good luck.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 07:15:30 am by abit »
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #95 on: October 04, 2020, 08:41:08 am »
是不是太自以为是了,怎么和你关注点不同就是选择性失明了
同一个事情,你觉得自己是BTS救星,铁腕改革,我看你是玩过家家胡闹,谁看谁都是失明的。


seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.
It's not gossip but public info.
You're free to choose to ignore them anyway, it is called "Selective blindness" (选择性失明).
Wish you good luck.

Online abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #96 on: October 04, 2020, 08:55:11 am »
是不是太自以为是了,怎么和你关注点不同就是选择性失明了
同一个事情,你觉得自己是BTS救星,铁腕改革,我看你是玩过家家胡闹,谁看谁都是失明的。


seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.
It's not gossip but public info.
You're free to choose to ignore them anyway, it is called "Selective blindness" (选择性失明).
Wish you good luck.
话已至此,不必多说。
你行你上。
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #97 on: October 04, 2020, 09:51:08 am »
His CEX orderbook is not even 1% of daily volume coinmarketcap
Your CEX iobanker is even not on cmc, boy

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #98 on: October 04, 2020, 09:57:47 am »
It's not gossip but public info.

It's just your FUD abit, your started it first in a chat to discredit Thule, you have no proof besides your rotten word

And btw if you attack our anonymity open your face first, do it please, I really want to know who you are. How dare you attack anyone anonymity meanwhile destroying this project from anonymous nickname by yourself?

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #99 on: October 04, 2020, 10:06:48 am »
I agree all these things are ridiculous.
I think it's not a big deal to change to another official github address if we have enough vote power.

I tend to agree it is the only way to save this project is to change official github. To protect existing and future businesses from one man dictatorship that happens now.
Also, it would be good move to change "official" dns to bitshares.exchange from bitshares.org.
We have at least 2 reason to support this
1) .org dns belongs to Milos that numerous times threat our gateway, and he has plan to filter it,



also he was manager of the core that brought trojan in the 4.0 release, and he publicly supported broke of consensus



2) bitshares.exchange the dns name that was bought by the community and belong to the community, so the community already spent money to obtain it, and now the correct time to use it
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 10:52:56 am by blockchained »

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #100 on: October 04, 2020, 11:11:11 am »
I agree this could be a security threat, and your advice is a possible choice, we can make a comunity consensus by voting.

I agree all these things are ridiculous.
I think it's not a big deal to change to another official github address if we have enough vote power.

I tend to agree it is the only way to save this project is to change official github. To protect existing and future businesses from one man dictatorship that happens now.
Also, it would be good move to change "official" dns to bitshares.exchange from bitshares.org.
We have at least 2 reason to support this
1) .org dns belongs to Milos that numerous times threat our gateway, and he has plan to filter it,



also he was manager of the core that brought trojan in the 4.0 release, and he publicly supported broke of consensus



2) bitshares.exchange the dns name that was bought by the community and belong to the community, so the community already spent money to obtain it, and now the correct time to use it

Offline Ammar Yousef (ioBanker)

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #101 on: October 04, 2020, 12:09:08 pm »
His CEX orderbook is not even 1% of daily volume coinmarketcap
Your CEX iobanker is even not on cmc, boy

ioBanker isn't CEX nor a gateway; stop comparing your poor startup with ioBanker, kid.
Be part of the change and set bitshares-vision as your proxy!
Committee account: iobanker-core
Ammar Yousef - CEO @ ioBanker OÜ

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #102 on: October 04, 2020, 12:22:31 pm »
ioBanker isn't CEX nor a gateway; stop comparing your poor startup with ioBanker, kid.
banker from the barn, you right you just a big mouth nothing more nor gateway, nor liquidity provider, just a fanboy with worthless opinion.
I don't know why abit mention you as a gateway, but yes you are just a banker from the barn.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 12:24:09 pm by blockchained »

Offline binggo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2350
  • 世间太多瘪犊子
    • View Profile
Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #103 on: October 04, 2020, 01:14:49 pm »
这真TM算是币圈一景啊, 个个嘴上都喊着维护共识,心里却想的是镰刀,前有无限正义的珠玉cn-vote,我想后必有更加无限正义的***

真是个个都想回到“狡伪成风,吏民相沿,不以为非”的时候。

« Last Edit: October 04, 2020, 01:27:28 pm by binggo »

Offline blockchained

Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Reply #104 on: November 12, 2020, 09:30:33 pm »
After abit trojan took place yesterday we've stopped our witness infrastructure for bitshares.

We have a capable team of core and UI devs, so we're preparing a fork of bitshares code base, back to the consensus rules that was before the abit abuse on github.
It will be a new distribution, a new chain, and a new genesis.
 
News will come latter with announcements.

Hello everyone!

Those of you who are following the Bitshares platform certainly know about the recent event, that caused a lot of debate. During the BTS4.0 protocol upgrade, one of the hired core devs (abitmore) added a community unapproved backdoor to the code, which led to the change of the voting rights, and a major change of the consensus procedure. As a result multiple conflicts ensued with a significant portion of chinese community leaving Bitshares.

After thoroughly analysing the consensus changes, that were made without voting or any discussion by community members, we verified that the resulting system is unscalable and doomed to stagnate. As a result our team decided to launch a fork of stable and time tested Bitshares3.0 consensus code using Graphene — the original name of the technology.

Graphene is the industrial grade technology, adapted both for private and company use. For years it was a foundation for the unique ecosystem and market economy. Its open source code and MIT license allow for creation and maintenance of different decentralized blockchain applications with workers system, that allows core token holders to elect which development to support.

To avoid the mistakes that resulted in the current status quo in Bitshares, we’ve reduced the maximum supply of GPH tokens, and decided to hold the initial distribution of Graphene tokens via all win and provably fair lottery.
The lottery would distribute 40 out of 100 million tokens, with further 60 million used in the reserve fund. The distributed tokens will form the genesis block of the Graphene blockchain, and all undistributed tokens from the 40 million will be burned.
Final supply will be formed out of the resulting sum (reserve fund + distributed tokens); 6% of that supply will be vested to the launch team with the following ratio: 1% will become available to the team within the first week of the launch, and the remaining 5% will be vested over the next 10 years.


GPH token has a limited supply, which differs from the liquid circulating supply. 60 million tokens are set aside for financing projects and block producer rewards. These funds will be available to the worker system only from GPH token holders approval. This working budget is known as “reserve pool”.
It is worth mentioning that transaction fees are not distributed among the GPH token holders, but are returned to the worker budget to pay for further development. There is no reward for holding the GPH core token in your wallet.

## About lottery

The lottery starts on the RuDEX platform concurrently with the publication of this announcement and will last for 40 days. Every days only 100,000 lottery tickets will be available, and with the end of the lottery period all undistributed tokens will be burned, with the final supply and genesis block of the new blockchain being formed as the result.

To participate in the lottery, you will have to buy a lotto ticket and register it.

Every registered ticket will allow you to win from 1 to 30 GPH tokens. For ease and transparency the lottery will be held on the Bitshares blockchain.

There are only 5 possible winning combinations with a fixed amount of tokens for each combination, as follows:

0 - 1
1 - 3
2 - 6
3 - 10
4 - 30

The combination number (0-4) will be calculated from the transaction hash on the ticket registration.

To demonstrate how the lottery works we will use RUDEX.LOTTERY token as an example.
As you can see in this block https://bts.ai/block/53159405 bot-11 account “registered” 1 RUDEX.LOTTERY and got a transaction number TXID of d60c7ce9467043cf81acd5fdb1c5bc851d20faed.
If this value is divided by modulo 5 (number of combinations), then the remainder of the division will be the combination number of this ticket. You can verify the division remainder using, for example, the following service: https://defuse.ca/big-number-calculator.htm
In our case you need to insert the following line into the calculator 0xd60c7ce9467043cf81acd5fdb1c5bc851d20faed  % 5, which is equal to the value of 4, which is a combination for 30 GPH token win.

It is possible to register any number of tickets concurrently, which results in cycles of combinations (0-4) are counted from the division reminder value of the transaction hash until all tickets are given the result.

For your ease and convenience the lottery page display the transaction hashes and results for all of your registered tickets. Every lottery result is available for a public review.

So if you are as tired of the unfair games and underhanded intrigues as we are, we are inviting you to start anew and open the Graphene technology in its original balanced and transparent nature

https://market.rudex.org/#/lottery

« Last Edit: November 12, 2020, 10:52:23 pm by blockchained »