Dry Run 2: The Real Deal

[crazybit]

Code: [Select]

Loading blockchain from "/root/.BitSharesXTS/chain"
Starting JSON RPC server on port 57466 (localhost only)
Starting HTTP JSON RPC server on port 9989 (localhost only)
------------ error --------------
8 out_of_range_exception: Out of Range
read datastream of length 23 over by 1
    {"method":"read","len":23,"over":1}
    th_a  datastream.cpp:6 throw_datastream_range_error
error unpacking uint8_t
    {"type":"uint8_t"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:440 unpack
optional<fc::exception>
    {"type":"fc::exception"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:164 unpack
Error unpacking field last_error
    {"field":"last_error"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:222 operator()
error unpacking bts::net::potential_peer_record
    {"type":"bts::net::potential_peer_record"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:440 unpack
what is wrong

unpack data failed, looks like your blockchain data structure does not syn with the code.

[BTSdac]

Code: [Select]

Loading blockchain from "/root/.BitSharesXTS/chain"
Starting JSON RPC server on port 57466 (localhost only)
Starting HTTP JSON RPC server on port 9989 (localhost only)
------------ error --------------
8 out_of_range_exception: Out of Range
read datastream of length 23 over by 1
    {"method":"read","len":23,"over":1}
    th_a  datastream.cpp:6 throw_datastream_range_error
error unpacking uint8_t
    {"type":"uint8_t"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:440 unpack
optional<fc::exception>
    {"type":"fc::exception"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:164 unpack
Error unpacking field last_error
    {"field":"last_error"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:222 operator()
error unpacking bts::net::potential_peer_record
    {"type":"bts::net::potential_peer_record"}
    th_a  raw.hpp:440 unpack
what is wrong

[alexxy]

I'm running test node with large allowed number of connections
can someone try to add me as peer?

79.173.81.171:8764

[welk1n]

Looks Good!

welk1n (unlocked) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 6097,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140615T095400",
  "blockchain_head_block_time_rel": "61 seconds ago",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 291,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 39.786710418375719,
  "network_num_connections": 8,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 9972700,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": "20140615T095945",
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": 284,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140615T095501",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "5ed94b17a1f657851194360dd760251c35c065af",
  "blockchain_shares": 10000100611524,
  "network_num_connections_max": 12,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "20141008T200641",
  "wallet_version": 100
}

[spartako]

Solved connection issue on ubuntu, I have now 6 active connections and my delegates ( init-delegate-21, init-delegate-22, init-delegate-23, init-delegate-24) are working.

[puppies]

On my end whatever you did has solved connection issues on all three nodes I'm running.

[tonyk]

Did I misunderstand your joke?

Yes you did..
Sam, Tom, Me and... 1 Indian tester....


...If you still do not get it - it is more of beginning of a racy joke then presentation of your core team (But as I said it is probably funny/sad to me only)

[myhometalk]

download the latest code from github and fresh run but still only getting one connection

Code: [Select]


myhometalk (locked) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 5995,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140615T054400",
  "blockchain_head_block_time_rel": "8 seconds ago",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 291,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 60.7008760951189,
  "network_num_connections": 1,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 0,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": null,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140615T054408",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "d79467e267d6234b43a043c9037a2998fe58e95b",
  "blockchain_shares": 10000093896268,
  "network_num_connections_max": 12,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "",
  "wallet_version": 100
}


[emski]

Just an update:

Code: [Select]

emski (unlocked) >>> get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 6002,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140615T054600",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 286,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 60.89139987445072,
  "network_num_connections": 26,
  "wallet_unlocked_seconds_remaining": 99913328,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": "20140615T054700",
  "wallet_seconds_until_next_block_production": 61,
  "wallet_local_time": "20140615T054559",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "c1286419a26cc7b0402fb40d3537f30a53c0837d",
  "blockchain_shares": 10000094357869,
  "network_num_connections_max": 50,
  "network_protocol_version": 101,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "20170814T152807",
  "wallet_version": 100
}
--- there are now 27 active connections to the p2p network
--- in sync with p2p network

I've increased network_num_connections_max and desired_number_of_connections just to see what happens.

[puppies]

Wipe your old data-dir

Ubuntu: rm -r ~/.BitShares\ XTS

This command has never done anything for me.  I feel I'm missing some implied instruction.  Anyone care to clue me in.

I've just been either completely rebuilding the server from scratch or using the following

Code: [Select]

rm -r bitshares*
and then cloneing etc.

Does this have the same effect?
I notice i still have my wallet and imported keys, where as, when building from scratch I have to re create wallet and import keys again.

# about
tells me im on the latest revision but was i supposed to remove something that "# rm -r bits*"   misses?

~/.BitShares\ XTS may be referring to an old data directory (I have noticed that the different versions I have downloaded and compiled have had slightly different data directories.  The current data dir is ~/.BitSharesXTS so the command would be

Code: [Select]

rm -r ~/.BitSharesXTS

This will wipe your wallet though.  You will need to either re-import keys or copy your wallet over to the new directory.  How I've done it is

Code: [Select]

cp -r ~/.BitSharesXTS/wallets ~
rm -r ~/.BitSharesXTS
mkdir ~/.BitSharesXTS
cp -r ~/wallets ~/.BitSharesXTS
there may be a better way of doing this.

I also currently just wipe out the bitshares_toolkit directory and git clone another one.  that is what your rm -r ~/bitshares* command was doing.  I am sure there is a better way than that to resync to git, but I don't know it.

[bitcoinerS]

It looks like you got voted out, probably when BM moved his votes to get someone else in since he is the only one voting ATM

 

Please vote me back in!

[toast]

Ok. With latest build my connection count is up to 8. Still delegate is not producing any blocks..

Code: [Select]

>>> blockchain_get_account_record bitcoiners
{
  "id": 299,
  "name": "bitcoiners",
  "public_data": null,
  "owner_key": "XTS8eoFWByxKtGYzBrNF4diAhv1zjY7jGNTUv6PSqVGbQs8yi7nqk",
  "active_key_history": [[
      "20140613T030845",
      "XTS8eoFWByxKtGYzBrNF4diAhv1zjY7jGNTUv6PSqVGbQs8yi7nqk"
    ]
  ],
  "delegate_info": {
    "votes_for": 2109074296,
    "votes_against": 0,
    "blocks_produced": 0,
    "blocks_missed": 63,
    "pay_balance": 0,


Code: [Select]

get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 5928,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140615T051545",
  "blockchain_head_block_time_rel": "55 seconds ago",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 291,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 61.12161310649023,
  "network_num_connections": 8,


Code: [Select]

>>> blockchain_list_delegates
..
** Inactive:
..         299               bitcoiners          2109074296                   0         0.0210906 %               0              63


It looks like you got voted out, probably when BM moved his votes to get someone else in since he is the only one voting ATM

[toast]

(from Feb till now)

Me & hackfisher & nikita started full-time in May. Vikram and Nathan still haven't officially started. Eric started in March. So I believe your "since february" applies to the two Dans and the polish team who have been on keyhotee this whole time. The rest are still part-time.

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/graphs/contributors

Did I misunderstand your joke?

[bitcoinerS]

Ok. With latest build my connection count is up to 8. Still delegate is not producing any blocks..

Code: [Select]

>>> blockchain_get_account_record bitcoiners
{
  "id": 299,
  "name": "bitcoiners",
  "public_data": null,
  "owner_key": "XTS8eoFWByxKtGYzBrNF4diAhv1zjY7jGNTUv6PSqVGbQs8yi7nqk",
  "active_key_history": [[
      "20140613T030845",
      "XTS8eoFWByxKtGYzBrNF4diAhv1zjY7jGNTUv6PSqVGbQs8yi7nqk"
    ]
  ],
  "delegate_info": {
    "votes_for": 2109074296,
    "votes_against": 0,
    "blocks_produced": 0,
    "blocks_missed": 63,
    "pay_balance": 0,


Code: [Select]

get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 5928,
  "blockchain_head_block_time": "20140615T051545",
  "blockchain_head_block_time_rel": "55 seconds ago",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 291,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 61.12161310649023,
  "network_num_connections": 8,


Code: [Select]

>>> blockchain_list_delegates
..
** Inactive:
..         299               bitcoiners          2109074296                   0         0.0210906 %               0              63


[tonyk]

Sorry but I could not resist posting a joke… fully understanding that I will be the only one to lough at it.

----
TK: “Dan, we all know that connecting with people and knowing the people you work with is very important to you. Can you describe your team?”
BM:“Yes, I really know all of them well, even though most of them started working effectively only this month. They are all pretty good, you know…[just needed a little bit of time worming up (from Feb till now)]. We are – Eric, Toast , Nikita, HackFisher, Dan N….
3 polish devs and 1 Indian tester”
----

PS
 To vote me out, you just need to issue the follow command before you perform postinthisforum
tonyk_go_fuck_youself  = [true]
‘