Author Topic: GetWork Miner 130 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner  (Read 56410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline doesntmatter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
  • You made this world, now live in it!
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #70 on: November 13, 2013, 09:55:34 pm »
when run without options (doesn't connect) on 1090t w 8gigs of mem ~70-80 hpm....
PsZtcn3NRs9P3ZqKdxah1uNLZ1QSuecbdd

Offline doesntmatter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
  • You made this world, now live in it!
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #69 on: November 13, 2013, 09:53:32 pm »
it seems to hash the same, but i can't actually get it to connect to wallet to mine???
PsZtcn3NRs9P3ZqKdxah1uNLZ1QSuecbdd

Offline spoonman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #68 on: November 13, 2013, 09:41:25 pm »
This what I am seeing on my rMPB:

ACCEPTED: 0
 ACCEPTED: 0
 ACCEPTED: 0
 ACCEPTED: 0
HPM: 146.101

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #67 on: November 13, 2013, 09:35:25 pm »
Hey bytemaster, i'm sorry, it does run really fast! I thought i had enabled release mode by setenv, but apparently that didn't work.

I'm getting 113 HPM now on an i7 2600k OC'd to 4.5GHZ.

Great!  So how close am I to ypool?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #66 on: November 13, 2013, 09:21:26 pm »
Hey bytemaster, i'm sorry, it does run really fast! I thought i had enabled release mode by setenv, but apparently that didn't work.

I'm getting 113 HPM now on an i7 2600k OC'd to 4.5GHZ.

Offline gigawatt

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #65 on: November 13, 2013, 09:01:10 pm »
Any ideas?

Code: [Select]
[  1%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/platform.hpp:22:0,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:4,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread.cpp:5:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp: In member function âvoid fc::thread_d::process_tasks()â:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:1081:95: error: invalid memory model for â__atomic_exchangeâ
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/all] Error 2

Thats a new one... what type of system ? Boost version?  That bug looks like it is in the boost code.

Ubuntu 13.04 x64, fresh install of Boost from sources.
I'll try a fresh VPS and see if that helps.
BTC: 1E2egHUcLDAmcxcqZqpL18TPLx9Xj1akcV
PTS: Pstkk1gZCxc4GEwS1eBAykYwVmcubU1P8L

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #64 on: November 13, 2013, 08:51:07 pm »
Win7 x64, i7-2600k @ 4.7Ghz

Benchmark Results: Between 138 and 159 hpm. Elasped time 133.382 seconds.

What was the final number... it is cumulative...

143.something hpm I only roughly glanced thru the figures

Ok, well at least that is in the ballpark of my numbers.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline ryen123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #63 on: November 13, 2013, 08:50:01 pm »
Win7 x64, i7-2600k @ 4.7Ghz

Benchmark Results: Between 138 and 159 hpm. Elasped time 133.382 seconds.

What was the final number... it is cumulative...

143.something hpm I only roughly glanced thru the figures. I mostly ran the linux protominer (yPool), that average is 160hpm. My pc is dual boot linux/windows.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2013, 08:51:49 pm by ryen123 »
Latest by GawMiners | DigitalOcean Sign-Up Receive $10 Credit
Singapore P2Pool: DarkCoin

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #62 on: November 13, 2013, 08:48:53 pm »
Win7 x64, i7-2600k @ 4.7Ghz

Benchmark Results: Between 138 and 159 hpm. Elasped time 133.382 seconds.

What was the final number... it is cumulative...  can you compare to ypool?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline ryen123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #61 on: November 13, 2013, 08:47:46 pm »
Win7 x64, i7-2600k @ 4.7Ghz

Benchmark Results: Between 138 and 159 hpm. Elasped time 133.382 seconds.
Latest by GawMiners | DigitalOcean Sign-Up Receive $10 Credit
Singapore P2Pool: DarkCoin

Offline Gumik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #60 on: November 13, 2013, 08:47:35 pm »
Code: [Select]
Boost version: 1.55.0
Boost include path: /usr/include
Could not find the following static Boost libraries:
        boost_context
Some (but not all) of the required Boost libraries were found. You may need to install these additional Boost libraries. Alternatively, set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR to the directory containing Boost libraries or BOOST_ROOT to the location of Boost.
** for a debug build: cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug ..

Seems there is a fcontext.hpp in /usr/include/boost but no context
XPM : AaMussGvG8963TZKswLVwY1BNG3zs22MvK
PTS : PpTe2GPfXkk1T4boaPATERzwVx5Sn5nyRr

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #59 on: November 13, 2013, 08:43:47 pm »
debug vs release gives about 7hpm difference. 40 vs 47.
How long did you let the benchmark run?
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bytemaster

Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #58 on: November 13, 2013, 08:42:36 pm »
Any ideas?

Code: [Select]
[  1%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/platform.hpp:22:0,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:4,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread.cpp:5:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp: In member function âvoid fc::thread_d::process_tasks()â:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:1081:95: error: invalid memory model for â__atomic_exchangeâ
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/all] Error 2

Thats a new one... what type of system ? Boost version?  That bug looks like it is in the boost code.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline gigawatt

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #57 on: November 13, 2013, 08:41:05 pm »
Any ideas?

Code: [Select]
[  1%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/platform.hpp:22:0,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/local/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:4,
                 from /root/fc/src/thread/thread.cpp:5:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp: In member function âvoid fc::thread_d::process_tasks()â:
/usr/local/include/boost/atomic/detail/gcc-atomic.hpp:1081:95: error: invalid memory model for â__atomic_exchangeâ
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/src/thread/thread.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/fc.dir/all] Error 2
BTC: 1E2egHUcLDAmcxcqZqpL18TPLx9Xj1akcV
PTS: Pstkk1gZCxc4GEwS1eBAykYwVmcubU1P8L

Offline crendore

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: GetWork Miner 120 HPM on 3.4Ghz i7 3x faster than coyote pool miner
« Reply #56 on: November 13, 2013, 08:40:02 pm »
benchmark? what benchmark? where do i find this? still getting only ~60HPM with i7 4.5 GHZ and built with:
cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release