The conversation between devs (catia and bitfreak) of cryptonite may shed a bit more light into Supernet:
<catia> yeah i dunno. it's like they want supernet to be integrated into coins rpc
<catia> and then to run supernet you have to run daemon for all coins
<catia> so it's like ultimate in blockchain bloat
<bitfreak> hmmm
<bitfreak> so they in order to be a part of the supernet we need to customize the rpc api?
<catia> yeah import their library
<catia> which of course won't work right
<bitfreak> lol of course
<catia> and it violates my #1 goal of killing QT
<bitfreak> I don't really trust the people behind it anyway, too closely related to NXT
<bitfreak> and they can't admit when their anon scheme sucks
<Myagui> but I don't think you need to tie up to local daemon for any coins catia , think you'll only need to run any of the coins if you want to trade from the supernet dividents (which I understand will all be issued as nxt assets)
<catia> yeah it wreaks of scam with IPO stuff and is likely against US securities laws
<catia> because it is structured like an ETF afaict
And this is bitfreak's reply to l777's invitation to Supernet
Quote from: jl777 on August 30, 2014, 06:58:51 AM
OK, it seems clear no interest
Supernetwork IPO on Poloniex
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.msg8592943#msg8592943bitfreak's reply: I didn't say I had no interest in the whole supernetwork thing, that does seem like an interesting idea. I just don't think the anonymity scheme you have developed is very compelling, it has too many assumptions which will never hold true in the real world, double spending prevents it from working as you imagine.