Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - oldman

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 38
376
General Discussion / Re: Glad I got out of bitcoin...
« on: September 19, 2014, 06:42:50 pm »
I'm picking up a little bit of bitBTC.

Now this is interesting... I've been buying BTC through the drop.

Going to buy bitBTC instead. Why not?

All my crypto eggs are in BTSX but I've still got 85% in stocks and fiat so it's not like I'm losing any sleep.  8)

I've begun divesting equity positions and am stepping into a short position.

This time around I'm using a novel approach via the inverse ETF's (SPXS, etc.). Getting lazy in my old age.

Point of my rambling is that if any of you are have substantial allocations in equities it may be time re-evaluate, take some profits and put on a few hedges.

Market could keep running, and probably will for a while yet, but at this point I'd rather have some of my profits secured than risk the exit rush.

And guess where those profits are going... ;)

377
I think the proposal has merit... in concept. The trick is implementation and BM/devs will need to chime in.

Not completely sold on whether the advantages outweigh the increased complexity; open Bazaar has some pretty convincing material on proof-of-burn for rep.

Could you perhaps elaborate on the aspects of proof-of-burn that you feel are inadequate or undesirable?


378
General Discussion / Re: Glad I got out of bitcoin...
« on: September 19, 2014, 04:13:39 pm »
Price is at $422 as of this post.

All in BTSX.

I moved a substantial allocation from BTC to BTSX when BTSX listed... but I'm too old to have all the eggs in one basket.

Well played!

379
General Discussion / Re: Will bitGOLD and bitSILVER have interest too?
« on: September 18, 2014, 09:41:50 pm »
As I understand it all bitAssets produce a yield.

380
General Discussion / Re: Big Bitshares marketing push?
« on: September 18, 2014, 09:39:42 pm »
I understand and like your thinking from the "A" side of the coin.  Let me provide some counter perspective (just to keep in mind):    All of these projects are essentially open source.  Anyone can take the software at any point and create there own product.  Additionally, there are many business cases where the BEST product does not necessarily "win"......(any one remember Betamax vs VHS?...probably to long ago for most :-), but there are other examples)  Thus, a big part of this competition is one of who can create the best network effect......fastest, biggest, deepest.    With open-source, marketing and consumer recognition weights quite heavily.

I do agree in principle and was definitely around for Betmax/VHS. It's also like pepsi/coke, nike/everyone else, microsoft/apple. So I completely understand where you're coming from.

Let's say someone ripped off the code and tried to push a knock-off with a killer marketing program... what would they call it?

Bitshares piggy-backing on Bitcoin is such a huge marketing advantage that even a knock-off with exactly the same feature set would have a heck of a time poaching market share.

And then... if someone were to try and snatch the code right now and try to beat Bitshares to market:

- It's not done

- No one in the world can develop faster/better than BM & Co.

- No one in the world can provide support like BM & Co.

And because the platform is constantly evolving, no one in the world can market it as quickly and effectively as Brian & Co. upon completion, because only Brian & Co. have direct access to BM & Co.

I think Bitshares enjoys one of Buffet's moats and it will be a long, long time before a competitor can build a bridge.

381
General Discussion / Re: Incentivize taking BTSX off the exchanges
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:47:23 pm »
Something like LocalBitcoins for BitUSD would be my recommendation.

You meet up with local sellers, hand over a $20 dollar note and seller transfers you $20 dollars BitUSD.

Quick and easy, no exchange rate haggling!

This is quite fascinating.

Instead of having to overcome the mental resistance to trading 'real money' for 'magic internet money' (ie. USD for BTC), folks can trade USD for bitUSD.

If bitUSD yield >= inflation this could be a lightbulb moment for a lot of folks.

Once they see how quick/easy it is to move bitAssets *and* see the yield roll in there will be no going back.

bitUSD/CNY/EUR/CAD etc. could be the gateway drug for the whole crypto eco system.

I know there's lots of discussion about Ripple/Stellar but no one understands what hell that means.

Now if localbitcoins could be convinced to add bitUSD or whatever the regional currency is a huge pipeline would open up practically overnight.

382
General Discussion / Re: Big Bitshares marketing push?
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:36:32 pm »
With regard to marketing there is no need to hurry as there is no real competition to race against.

The Bitshares branding trumps all else - Nxt/Nubits/Counterparty etc. can't really compete as they have to overcome the 'what the heck is Nxt?' barrier.

Bitcoin -> Bitshares is such a huge advantage that the devs can well afford the time needed to get the platform in top shape.

I would go further and propose it is actually advantageous to lie low for a while.

The devs have received enormously valuable feedback on the market mechanics and platform.

They are incredibly nimble in adapting and capitalizing on new opportunities.

The better way to look at this situation is that every day the devs advance the platform they also realize more value for BTSX shareholders.


383
General Discussion / Re: Proposal - Significant Enhancement to Market Engine
« on: September 18, 2014, 05:25:29 pm »
It has taken 5 years for BTC to begin to be accepted at a very limited number of places. BTSX and bitUSD are on a faster track than BTC was. Give it a couple years. Once merchants realize that the earned interest will offset transaction and clearing fees, bitUSD will be widely accepted.

This cannot be understated.

384
General Discussion / Re: Price speculation
« on: September 17, 2014, 10:33:39 pm »
I find the "price is dropping because miner's are selling" a bit difficult to accept.

What have the miner's been doing prior to this decline? Not selling?

If you look at localbitcoins folks are buying like crazy; recent news has been the most bullish in the history of bitcoin; VC investment is at an all-time high.

Bitcoin trades largely on sentiment, sentiment is increasingly optimistic and the price should be ticking up.

But price is inexplicably bleeding down.

I've got tinfoil on this one - the next leg up is being delayed via open market operations until ETFs go live.

How does this impact BTSX?

May be positive:

- Won't make sense to sell BTSX to buy BTC if BTC continues to decline; reduced selling pressure

- Folks may sell BTC (old tech going down!) to buy BTSX (new tech going up!); increased buying pressure

- Folks may still believe in BTC but move into bitBTC and use the yield to offset the price decline; increased buying pressure

Or there may just be a panic where everyone sells everything...

385
General Discussion / Re: Transparency
« on: September 17, 2014, 08:37:42 pm »
Excellent idea.

386
General Discussion / Re: Proposal - Significant Enhancement to Market Engine
« on: September 17, 2014, 04:30:50 pm »
If training wheels are required is does not matter whether they are touching the ground (proposed) or raised up (existing).

Given that there is no way to eliminate feeds completely the platform may as well utilize them to fullest extent possible.

But caution is required - we don't want to end up with a 10 year-old that needs training wheels.  ;)




387
General Discussion / Re: BTSX Price Getting Spanked by CNY
« on: September 17, 2014, 03:57:17 pm »
Folks are going to start pushing the BTSX market around; easy money to be made taking advantage of the relatively low liquidity.

Expect a lot of volatility for at least the next year or two.

I find crypto-investors fascinating for the hyper-sensitivity to market movements!

Traditional (fiat) investing typically involves identifying business with profitable strategies, allocating a percentage of the portfolio and re-evaluating 1-5+ years down the road.

Crypto-investors seem to re-evaluate on an hourly/daily basis.

If you believe in the Bitshares tech then it is a two-year investment horizon, minimum.

So allocate a stake (that you can afford to lose), expect to hold for at least two years, stay informed (due diligence) and watch the price go up/down/up with detached bemusement.






388
can we hold off on opening new markets for a week?

It would be prudent to get the client, market mechanics and trading platform sorted before any additional bitAssets go live.

389
General Discussion / Re: 5% annual fee. What is the point?
« on: September 16, 2014, 07:01:28 pm »
Would still prefer the peace of mind of a complete air-gap between my funds and the rest of the world.
 storage is an issue that needs to be addressed thoroughly.

Without getting too pedantic your funds are never offline as they are always just a "score" on the blockchain. Once you send funds to the public key it's out there and can be brute forced (though most likely so hard no one bothers trying).

A better strategy would be to have your funds spread between a half dozen or so wallets each with a different passphrase and uploading them to DropBox, OneDrive, GoogleDrive, and whatever you have for usb storage, printing private keys, etc.

Cracking one of your private keys wouldn't gain them anything on the others and with TITAN it'd be very hard for a hacker to pick targets.

Also, it's highly unlikely that a hacker is going to spend significant resources on a wallet they can't get the balance of. TITAN takes care of that too.

Good points!

Perhaps it is a psychological thing.

The client feels like a hot wallet, and already most crypto investors feel hot /= secure.

Also, my last attempt at multiple wallets did not end well.

Currently it seems to be one wallet/password per machine which is obviously not conducive to this approach.

Best of all worlds would be a watch-only mechanism where BTSX and bitAssets could be transferred to a paper wallet or other media and physically secured.

The trick, of course, is avoiding the inactivity fee when in storage.

Perhaps the only way to do this is to pay a small cold storage fee to the network, like a safety deposit box fee.

Not really unreasonable at all!

The owner just burns a small amount of BTSX as proof that the funds in storage are being stored rather than lost.

Would still prefer the peace of mind of a complete air-gap between my funds and the rest of the world.
 storage is an issue that needs to be addressed thoroughly.

Without getting too pedantic your funds are never offline as they are always just a "score" on the blockchain. Once you send funds to the public key it's out there and can be brute forced (though most likely so hard no one bothers trying).

A better strategy would be to have your funds spread between a half dozen or so wallets each with a different passphrase and uploading them to DropBox, OneDrive, GoogleDrive, and whatever you have for usb storage, printing private keys, etc.

Cracking one of your private keys wouldn't gain them anything on the others and with TITAN it'd be very hard for a hacker to pick targets.

Also, it's highly unlikely that a hacker is going to spend significant resources on a wallet they can't get the balance of. TITAN takes care of that too.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rurll/on_the_subject_of_listing_all_possible_private/

cracking TITAN keys is much more resource intensive as you still have to rescan the WHOLE blockchain on every single guess .. that is WAY .. WAY ... WAY .. to expensive!

We really need this sort of thing to be very visible to newcomers.

I've been here a while and did not know this.

This would give the typical BTSX/bitAsset owner a large measure of comfort.

390
Well done!  +5%

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 38