Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Akado

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 184
841
Stan I think your answer is answers more the question "What would your exchange offer if they joined OpenLedger" and not "How can your exchange profit" from this.

Also, regarding the question of them having to use hot and cold wallets and still be vulnerable, what's your take on that?

How would you answer when he tells me "I don't want to send my users elsewhere". He still retains "ownership" of his clients, they're just operating directly on the blockchain now so..

My struggle is being able to explain this in the more simple way possible. I told him someone more knowledgeable would contact him. @Stan do you have the time to do it? Sorry to depend on you, it's just that I dont want to mess it up again. If he asks me another question that I'm not able to answer I dont want to tell him "ok let me get to someone who knows best and ill get back to you" that doesnt sound good or professional at all... That's my problem atm. Btw, overall, what do you think about our conversation?

842
Depends on the feature of course. This is too subjective. You need to provide a concrete example so people could evaluate it. Different people have different "killer" features. This is too relative. For some, something might be worth X, for others, it might be worth more or less, according to their opinion.

You won't get to a conclusion with your current question.

843
BitMEX could be an interesting one to approach, it seems they're very interested in leverage trading and are doing guides and blog posts about it. Bond Markets could be a good news for them

Reply from JUSTCOIN

Dear Akado,

Thanks for contacting ANX.

We look for competitive vendors from time to time. If you can provide more information about your company such as work portfolio, service scope, pricing tables as well as to offer us a free demo / trial etc., we can file the information for records. If we have any suitable projects which are related to your service scope, we can have further discussion.
Queena
Customer Support Team

844
General Discussion / Re: Can private and public blockchains be connected?
« on: January 10, 2016, 11:27:28 pm »
Yes, this exists and is possible. Crypti has private blockchains... each dApp uses its own blockchain. It also exists with merge-mined coins (namecoin, devcoin) and protocols built on top of Bitcoin (counterparty, mastercoin, rootstock). There are probably a lot of other examples that don't immediate come to mind.

Then I really don't know what's the big fuss about it if that can be done. Do those methods limit the power of those companies on the network? Most likely they do and that's why they avoid them.

845
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40dfyc/what_the_worst_first_week_of_trading_in_history/

This is interesting. If 2016 is going to be a bad yet for the markets, what could this mean? Gold up? It could make the chinese to hedge against this by buying bitcoin? This associated with the halving could give crypto a new boost. If bitcoin really goes that up, then it could be good for alts too.

846
General Discussion / Can private and public blockchains be connected?
« on: January 10, 2016, 11:05:43 pm »
First I would like to say that I'm not hoping any bank adopts BitShares.

But I would like to know this. Banks want private blockchains. Can't we, with account permission and privacy related features create this? I mean, the concept of Intranet vs Internet is kind of ridiculous.

Mixing these we could simulate private chains up to some point right? It wouldn't really be a private chain per se. It would just be a simulated one. We could have 2 in 1 and be one step ahead in this race and have market mover advantage. Or isn't this realistic or feasible?

They would still have power in decision making. Well, with DPOS they can.

If it is, obviously banks or other big companies won't just forget their private blockchains like that, but with a little bit of exposure and if the word goes out, we could have the advantage. Lots of ifs and speculation, but it's just a thought.

847
Openledger / Re: OpenLedger Suggestions
« on: January 10, 2016, 09:15:09 pm »
Most volume there was DOGE, it should be a good bet for OpenLedger to try and get the most customers possible from Cryptsy

@ccedk you should ask @Hypercube to change the image appearing on the video thumbnail. It's bad. It's red and a signal of warning, it isn't attractive when you want to show it. The thumbnail should be the OpenLedger logo with the purple/blue background.


Also, is it possible to have the Daily Decrypt suggest user's to go to OpenLedger in the recent scam and failure of Cryptsy? It would be a major advertisement! Same for Bitcoin Rush! Amanda even has a lifetime membership and can profit from that, offered by our community.

848
@fav it was just an AMA, it wasn't directly promoting BitShares so I thought it should have a chance and it did, small but did

Let's get some Cryptsy users! Upvote and comment!

https://www.reddit.com/r/cryptsy/comments/40d7iy/inviting_all_cryptsy_users_to_join_openledger_a/

849
Let me just say they're still waiting to be contacted. If someone knowledgeable enough would step forward would be nice.

850
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 10, 2016, 06:25:30 pm »
I am new with BTS. Bought my first BTS at BTER.com but found immediately out that you cannot withdraw. Strange that I did research before but could not find any quotes on internet about any issues with BTS. Made a ticket at BTER and hope will not have to wait as long as I do at Cryptsy.com. Decentralization is the future in my opinion. A very open communication too. Even if there is a problem on some websites.

Bter has had multiple problems in the past. The recommended exchanges to get BTS are CCEDK, Metaexchange, Blocktrades

If you need more volume, Poloniex and BTC38

851
General Discussion / Re: [EBM] Exchange Business Management Team
« on: January 10, 2016, 03:56:53 pm »
Thanks abit.

I posted an update on the Polo thread. It seems it might be too early to get exchanges on board, though if someone wants to try it, I suggest start by the smaller ones as they have the most to gain.

As for providing liquidity I really can't help with that. We already have bitUSd and bitCNY markets on Poloniex and they're dead. We need some market making there.

852
Imo don't ask. Why will she answer? You should already know it before talk with her, at least you should know some possible problems she's facing. Or perhaps I'm wrong since I'm not a marketing/sales guy.

Yes, we need to know the general problems first which are mostly security related. But we also need to know what problems each exchange has as each case is a different case right? And from then, explain how we can prevent and solve those same problems, specifically for them. I'm writing a post which is kind of big atm, however, I'm missing the part where exchanges benefit the most, that's the main part to get them on board.

Thanks for pinging Stan, he might be able to help. He pitched BitShares to businesses already, maybe not to exchanges directly? But still, some situations might be similar.

853
General Discussion / Re: [EBM] Poloniex
« on: January 10, 2016, 03:49:23 pm »
Polo now has bitUSD market
https://www.poloniex.com/exchange#btc_bitusd

And also bitCNY
https://www.poloniex.com/exchange#btc_bitcny

They're just not liquid. It would be nice if someone could move operations there.

854
General Discussion / Re: How to take the most out of STEALTH
« on: January 10, 2016, 02:32:13 pm »
@bytemaster

What about Dark Pools? Similar to Kraken? Stealth is all about privacy. Couldn't we introduce a dark pool system where a user could place an offer without it showing on the orderbooks? Couldn't that solve the problem of stealth accounts placing orders?

You still might not be able to use a stealth account and place orders, however, you can place orders without others knowing.

This complements this privacy component people seem to care about. I don't know about it's feasibility, maybe mask it as a standard transaction, maybe use another method, but this goes in well with stealth. That way people can still have privacy while placing orders and even facilitate users get better prices.

http://blog.kraken.com/post/121063219162/introducing-the-kraken-dark-pool

What problem of stealth accounts placing orders? How do you lose anonymity by placing orders on order books? If no one links the account to you then it's private.

I think I read that somewhere. Maybe because the amount transacted isn't supposed to be known and you need it to be known when you place an order. I might be mistaken here though

855
thanks @xeroc and @BunkerChain Labs

You're right. I could have researched first. It was just that I sent a few emails just for the sake of it and really wasn't even expecting them to reply back. It was an innocent task. I tried to mention how they could benefit from us but I guess I didn't express myself better.

I think a better approach would be to start by asking what problems do they have when managing operations and how that could be prevented with BitShares. I wanted to but failed to show that concern you mention. I'm just not really used to doing this but I believe it was a good experience. I can always have someone else talking with him, someone with more knowledge.

Any volunteers there?

@cass
Just letting you know I approve your worker.

Stuff missing are those easy steps. In case they're interested they need to know how difficult it is to migrate. What consequences that might have for them. How much time it takes and drawbacks. They need to know that so it doesn't affect their business.

One other detail is, atm we only focus on the users. How they benefit. But we should also focus on businesses because they're the ones who bring great amounts of users. They need to know why they benefit, what's in for them. What to they gain with this. Atm I can only come up with two things: database hosted on the blockchain so less expenses and more safety, saving them money and work. But there should be more. We won't be able to see them BitShares just with this. Referral program... yes, but they already make money with each trade their users do so there's not really a difference. We need to focus on businesses. This case, exchanges. There must be other advantages other than those, otherwise they won't come in.

So, could someone answer the following question in detail for me please: How do exchanges benefit from BitShares? How do they make more money or have more exposure? Let's not confuse with the benefits users have. Exchanges might not care about transparency, etc

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 184