Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - graffenwalder

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22
271
General Discussion / Re: Worst Case Scenario Contingency Planning
« on: August 05, 2014, 07:18:38 pm »
It has been pointed out that the weakest part of DPOS is that once someone controls 51 delegates they can never be fired unless they consent because they could filter any transaction that votes for someone other than themselves.    There are several ways to gain control of 51 delegates:

1) SWAT team all over the world
2) Blackmail delegates
3) Buy up the stake.

In any of these events the current crop of delegates needs to be purged.   In the case where they bought up the stake then any balances voting for the attackers also need to be purged.

I think that it should be possible to pre-plan for this scenario by shipping every wallet with an emergency backup-fork switch.  At any time users can simply go into advanced and enter a block number that they would like to "hard fork" and a list of misbehaving delegates for which balances should be purged. 

We can then provide a URL scheme that entirely documents the hard-fork and developers / community members can simply share the URL.  All of the honest nodes automatically switch to the new fork without anyone having to distribute new binaries.

There might be some confusion about which URL to follow, but in most cases the attack should be very clear and the solution equally clear.  The social consensus will form and the chain can continue.   After all failure to agree is agreeing to fail.

Would only the transactions of the attacker get purged?

And what would happen to the balances that get purged?

And if someone would get tricked in voting for the attacker, their balance would also be purged?

272
Btsx ID: graffenwalder   Thanks

273
General Discussion / Re: BTS X is Live
« on: July 20, 2014, 01:49:40 pm »
Same here last block was 40 minutes ago.

274
General Discussion / Re: BitShares PTS2 - Community Input Thread
« on: May 21, 2014, 06:45:48 pm »
All DACs have snapshots that honor something.
Upgrade DACs honor their predecessor.
New DACs honor their industry parent which honor PTS/AGS.
If a DAC is the first in a new industry, it honors PTS/AGS directly, just like XT did on February 28.

When an upgrade occurs it can be done either by hard fork if there is delegate consensus or as an alternative chain if not. 

When an alternative chain is offered, everybody gets shares in both via the snapshot mechanism.  As long as there are users for both, they can co-exist like Coke Classic and New Coke a few decades ago.  The expectation is that one or the other of the products will win and the other will fade to zero - but that is up to the market to decide.

Been sitting quietly on the sidelines watching this forum everyday. Recently there was a thread: Today I loose confidence in I3. I thought come on guys, just be patient some great products will come. And so far your logic always made sense.

But the coexistence of PTS and PTS2 just seems like a quick money scheme, the fact that you're considering to do this even before the AGS funding is over, makes me think you're having funding problems. Another million would be enough for now, but what will you come up with, when those funds have dried up?

For investors your making the deal more complicated than it already is, now they have to choose between holding PTS and PTS2, because DAC's can choose to honor either one

PTS will drop from the top 10 coin market list, because it has effectively lost half it's value.

Sorry to be cynical, I still believe in I3, but this just doesn't make any sense.

No money problems.  Our books are open for inspection.

We need to upgrade PTS because people have been complaining about how slow it is.

The logical upgrade that solves everything is DPOS.

DPOS frees up 300,000 that would have been needed to pay miners.

What do to with them is the question.

Not mining them (i.e. burning them) would give a 15% one time windfall to PTS holders even though it was AGS donations that made the DPOS breakthrough possible.

We think those savings from that R&D should be used to benefit everyone in our industry.

By calling attention to PTS and all the things its good for, we generate demand that we hope will grow the value of PTS and its children and therefore of AGS far more than any other plan we have heard.

PTS will climb on coinmarketcap as others learn what it is good for.  Other BitShares DACs will appear there too as the promotions generates demand for them.

Demand for increased marketing effort (and the desire by this community to be seen as generous) has been all over this forum for months.

We listened.

We came up with a plan that  would do all of the above.

We offer it as an alternative you can choose or reject.

Sorry for my rant this morning.

I wasn't aware that the PTS chain was crawling to a stand still, and that the PTS couldn't be upgraded to DPOS.

Sorry for doubting, faith is once again restored.

275
General Discussion / Re: BitShares PTS2 - Community Input Thread
« on: May 21, 2014, 05:18:49 am »
All DACs have snapshots that honor something.
Upgrade DACs honor their predecessor.
New DACs honor their industry parent which honor PTS/AGS.
If a DAC is the first in a new industry, it honors PTS/AGS directly, just like XT did on February 28.

When an upgrade occurs it can be done either by hard fork if there is delegate consensus or as an alternative chain if not. 

When an alternative chain is offered, everybody gets shares in both via the snapshot mechanism.  As long as there are users for both, they can co-exist like Coke Classic and New Coke a few decades ago.  The expectation is that one or the other of the products will win and the other will fade to zero - but that is up to the market to decide.

Been sitting quietly on the sidelines watching this forum everyday. Recently there was a thread: Today I loose confidence in I3. I thought come on guys, just be patient some great products will come. And so far your logic always made sense.

But the coexistence of PTS and PTS2 just seems like a quick money scheme, the fact that you're considering to do this even before the AGS funding is over, makes me think you're having funding problems. Another million would be enough for now, but what will you come up with, when those funds have dried up?

For investors your making the deal more complicated than it already is, now they have to choose between holding PTS and PTS2, because DAC's can choose to honor either one

PTS will drop from the top 10 coin market list, because it has effectively lost half it's value.

Sorry to be cynical, I still believe in I3, but this just doesn't make any sense.
 

276
General Discussion / Re: Explanatory videos
« on: April 03, 2014, 04:28:15 pm »
Maybe a video that shows a glimpse of future possibilities while keeping it lite.

Shown in headlines:
2020. Whitehouse staff member accidentally put white house on bitshares real estate.
President .......... No choice but to move out, after being sold for 1 btc/x amount bitusd

2027 Bitshares music and bitshares video run Sony out of business.

Running a blank now, maybe someone else can come up with other stuff for this video.

End the video with Reimagine everything.

277
General Discussion / Re: What is a crypto-equity?
« on: April 02, 2014, 09:24:26 pm »
Was wondering how the percentage was going to be shown in the wallet.

The BIP seems to be a good solution.

But when you would like to transfer to an exchange are you sending BIP's or shares?

In other words, would this force a centralized exchange to trade in BIP's?

278
General Discussion / Re: Decentralized Autonomous Jedi Mind Tricks
« on: March 30, 2014, 01:32:05 pm »
Sorry guys I'm not getting it.
What is this post supposed to say?

We should call a DAC a DAC?
A long explanation why we shouldn't use mining?
Or is it just a way to explain The DAC concept?

279
KeyID / Re: DNS-Pinky-Promise Bounties
« on: March 21, 2014, 07:59:40 pm »
Ok, so what Toast is saying:

The PTS that are still in the AGS wallet, will of course get DNS shares.

These DNS Shares are used to fund DNS.

In this way the AGS funds itself (BTC, PTS) won't be used for the development of DNS.

280
General Discussion / Re: Intro Video Sneak Peek
« on: March 21, 2014, 06:56:30 pm »
Great work Brian, one thing though.

The video starts with imagine a company........... And then imagine you could be one of these shareholders.

The double imagine makes it sound a bit like an overly ambitious project.

Maybe.   Think of a company........ Imagine you could be one of these shareholders.

Just my 2 cents.

281
BitShares AGS / Re: I still struggle understanding
« on: March 21, 2014, 06:23:21 pm »
By donating bitcoin, you receive AGS. If you donated before March 1, then your AGS will give you BTS. There's no exact release date for bitshares, but it would surely not be after 120 days.

Yes you would have kept your PTS and got 1.3x BTS. For your AGS donated before March you will get 3.33x BTS.

PTS are like shares, when a DAC comes out you will get a share of that, see it as dividends

282
General Discussion / Re: bitGold
« on: March 12, 2014, 09:46:20 pm »
Yes.

There are also valid reasons one could say "no:"

Can the gold bar in your basement be unexpectedly replaced (without your consent) with an equivalent number of XTS?
Can market forces ever decide that the gold bar in your basement isn't worth its weight in gold?
Can you use the BitGLD in your wallet to purchase something in the event of a large-scale power blackout?

Everything depends on what you're looking for in gold and/or BitGLD. BitGLD has many many advantages over physical gold in terms of liquidity, fungibility, portability, etc., but when it comes down to brass tacks, it is not backed by physical gold. It is backed by a promise from the BitShares X network to pay a the market value of BitGLD in XTS. If, for whatever reason (whether it be the network is maliciously attacked, or something severe happens to weaken speculators' confidence), the network stops honoring its promise, BitGLD will go the way of MtGox's Bitcoins.

If you want to take advantage of the long-term value stability (i.e., over decades) of physical gold, then BitGLD is absolutely worse than physical gold. If you want to use gold as a medium for exchange, then BitGLD is the thing for you.

 +5%, which doesn't mean I'm not excited about bit gold.

This might be an obvious question but what is Bitgold meant to be valued at, Troy ounce?

283
That's what I thought, but Brian clearly states that AGS will become liquid somewhere at the end of the funding period (41:10). We'll let's hope it's a mistake, otherwise this will cause a major sh*tstorm.

But yeah, other than that great interview

284
Did I get this right, will AGS become liquid after the fundraiser? 41:10

285
BitShares AGS / Re: Bitshares AGS and new DACs
« on: March 01, 2014, 02:36:20 pm »
This all dependends on when an upcoming DAC is released. Say it's released after the AGS funding period. Then you will get more shares from PTS than AGS. Because there will be 2 million AGS and less than that PTS.

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22