Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brent.Allsop

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17
226
General Discussion / "Turring Complete" functionality for Bitshare DACS?
« on: January 30, 2014, 01:32:02 am »
Etherium advertizes a "Turring Complete" python subset language their DAOs will be able to be programmed with.

Will Bitshare DAOs have more or less than this?  And what will that be?

Brent Allsop





227
General Discussion / Re: The BitShares Brand
« on: January 30, 2014, 01:28:17 am »

228
BitShares AGS / Re: Repost: Announcing AGS & BitShares Allocation
« on: January 30, 2014, 01:26:16 am »

It says: "Be vigilant! Watch for slow days and anyone can snag some great bargains."

Also people mention things like some guy is buying 10 BTC worth each day.

How do you get this kind of information?

Brent Allsop


229
General Discussion / Re: Estimated Price of 1 Bitshare
« on: January 29, 2014, 03:39:00 pm »
Exactly... we will not start our major marketing push until we have it battle hardened.

Marketing and advertizing is very different than communication done in a peer reviewed, level playing field place like canonizaer.com.

If Ether is shit, and Bitshares are way better than Bitcoin, people need to know, concisely and quantitatively, how many people think this, and they need to know, concisely and quantitatively, how many people think differently, and they need to be able to track this consensus information in real time.  And people need to be able to invest in the right organization, not the wrong one, significantly increasing the efficiency and the speed of development of this market.

At least that's my Newbie opinion.











230
General Discussion / Re: Estimated Price of 1 Bitshare
« on: January 29, 2014, 03:24:47 pm »
Ethereum is an interesting academic exercise and a great way for people to explore the DAC space, but anything worthwhile that can be made into a "true" DAC will be cloned, made more profitable and scalable, and made to honor PTS =D

Shit, I just saw this:

"0.5X ether will be mined per year forever after that point (ie. permanent linear inflation)"

That's a 50% per year tax on the holders of Either, right?  I see more and more of these kinds of dumb things being done by that group, and they are loosing my trust, fast.  Nobody is going to want to pay that tax rate.  Why would they?

Also, the fact that Vitalic was involved in the "Dark Wallet", really destroys my trust.  We need to be as open as possible, and have a mantra that everyone know everything, if you ask me.  Dan Laramer, and Invictus Innovations is more open than any other organization I've seen, that's another reason I'm loving this camp better and better.


But yes BTS blows all altcoins out of the water, the only advantage BTC has is confidence in the code. I think we shouldn't be in a rush to market until the code is battle-hardened a bit

It's not advertizement, it's simply communication and being open.  Any secret thinking along these lines will destroy our reputation.  The reason the securities and exchange commission regulates the hell out of the IPO process is precisely to solve this problem:  people getting blindsided, and loosing lots of money.  Being open and communicating to everyone, in a trusted way, is the only way to avoid having the hell regulated out of the crypto currency market.  Without good communication, the general population will be thinking:

"Those bastard geeks just stole all my money, since I didn't know what they were up to, they should be thrown in jail, and all their money should be confiscated so this doesn't happen again for anyone else."

As much as possible, we need to make it so they think:

"Wow, I heard about that, and if I would have listened and sold then, I wouldn't have lost all this money.  Next time I will pay more attention, and I'll be the one profiting."

Sure the Invictus code isn't battle hardened yet.  We need to make sure all such is part of the communication, and this is the difference between advertizing.  We need to vet the ideas as much as possible, pros and cons, so everyone can know in a peer reviewed way, what is coming, before it comes, and also so any problems can be uncovered as soon as possible.  And Invictus code can be fixed, so that doesn't bother me, it's just a matter of time.

I propose we start a new camp to communicate what we are doing here, so people can see how the experts compare Bitshares to all other competitors as soon as possible:

http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/150

I propose a camp name of "Bitshares"

Are there any better experts than me that would be willing to make a first draft of a camp statement, or at least help with such, with all this information contained in it?

Brent Allsop













231
General Discussion / Re: Estimated Price of 1 Bitshare
« on: January 29, 2014, 01:21:04 pm »
When Invictus deliver, even owning a handful of bitshares will prove rewarding. There is much to accomplish but I believe in Invictus.

Using the PTS and AGS price, I estimate they are currently around 15 USD. In my opinion they are severely undervalued.

On launch I will not be surprised by $100+ USD.

Why only Lite coin?  Lite coin is just a clone of Bitcoin, with no significant differences.  While Bitshares is vastly superior in so many ways.  The most important way, according to investors, like me, is the amount of new coins coming into existence, which is like a tax on the holders.  Not only are there drastically fewer Bitshares, and where Bitcoin has 12% new coins each year, Bitshares has none of this.  So right out of the gate you have at least 10% better performance, just on this alone, to say nothing of all the other improvements.

Seems to me this must also blow away Bitcoin, not just Litecoin.

And if THIS is true, we need to get this information canonized, and communicated out to the public better.  One thing we don't want, for sure, is for something like this to blindside everyone.  It looks to me like we are all the only ones that know about this.  And once These are trading, it could, within a few days, kill Bitcoin and surpass it's market share, in a very messy way - with LOTS of people losing LOTS of money.

Sure we'll all profit from it, but think about what that will do to crypto currency in the eyes of the public.  They will view it as a bunch of nerds successively creating new better coins, selling the public on them, then secretly creating better coins to take all this money away from them.  The only way to avoid this is to publicize this kind of information in a trusted place like Canonizer.com, so it is very public information, otherwise the regulators, and public in general, are going to come after us big time.  For example, we should create a new topic describing why we all think Bitshares is superior to all other Bitcoins, and why here:

http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/150

Can any expert out there make any justified argument that says Bitshares will not surpass Lite coin, Bitcoin, and every other coin out there, in a big way?  Is there any other investment out there that is better than, or even close to Bitshares?  Isn't Etherium about to start something similar?  How does it compare?  Others?

Brent Allsop
















232
General Discussion / Re: Estimated Price of 1 Bitshare
« on: January 29, 2014, 01:00:58 pm »
*[…]  Is anyone going mostly all in with angel shares?

Ask that guy who donates 10 BTC nearly every day  :)

How do you know this?  Is this information visible someplace publicly?
I'd like to put a lot more into Bitshares, but not sure the best way to do it.



233
General Discussion / Re: Estimated Price of 1 Bitshare
« on: January 28, 2014, 02:31:14 pm »

Folks,

I still have a few questions about this valuation information:
* When will Bitshares start trading, and could this be delayed?
* Will protoshares cease to exist at that time, having been converted to Bitshares?
* As far as people that really understand this stuff, what is your target position for how much you be your target holdings?.  For example when the funding round closes, what percentage of your capital will be Bitcoin vs protoshares vs angel shares?  Is anyone going mostly all in with angel shares?
* Will the security of Bitshares be equal to the Mining of Bitcoin?
* Once the financing round closes in a few months, would, or could there ever be any more Bitshares put into the economy?
* Still struggling to understand who is paying this Bitshare interest.  What controls how much this will be?  Will it be the amount if interest and activity in futures contracts?

Thanks!

Brent Allsop

234
General Discussion / Technology to use for Canonizer DAC?
« on: January 22, 2014, 03:29:45 am »

We're working on creating a Canon Coin crypto currency for Canonizer.com.  For a description of the goals see this wikiable google doc:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l4A-ZqsqDhjmxNtVqNxIiItVbv6HpPbS9WxV_rBRf0I/edit

The competing Crypto Currency competitors include Invictus Innovations technolodgy, Ethereum, Mastercoin, Colored Coins, NxT, and possibly others.  This stuff is all very technically difficult to comprehend, fully, so knowing which is best is not something even very smart people can do good due diligence for.  This kind of theoretical work is an ideal candidate for the amplification of the wisdom of the crowd process that can survey all the best experts to find out what the expert agree is truly the best, and why.

So we are creating a topic to survey for what is the best DAC technology:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfltL_Ng1NwuXwUjN9GwnK4UEtn-YoyFkZXWjma75lw/edit

The most important thing is this survey is for everyone, not just experts.  If you have a favorite technology, or one you know one more than any other, could you help us wiki the various camps, and possibly support which is currently your favorite?

And if any of you know any supporters of the above possible competitors for being accepted as what Canonizer.com will use, could you please forward this information to them, so they might have their marketing people help out with their respective camps?

Upwards,

Brent Allsop



235
General Discussion / Re: Canonizer.com DAC
« on: January 21, 2014, 12:39:48 pm »

Thanks Fuznuts,

We're working on a petition topic at Canonizer.com to gauge how much support there is for this.  We're starting with a wikiable Google doc that describes the goals:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l4A-ZqsqDhjmxNtVqNxIiItVbv6HpPbS9WxV_rBRf0I/edit?usp=sharing

We're also starting a topic to survey for what is the best technology to use for such.  Competitors include Invictus Innovations, Altcoin, Ethereum, Colored Coins, NxT, and possibly others.  If you have any information about how good any of these technologies are feel free to help out.  The goal is to know, concicely and quanitatively, what everyone thinks in an amplified wisdom of the crowd say.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfltL_Ng1NwuXwUjN9GwnK4UEtn-YoyFkZXWjma75lw/edit

Also, if you know anyone working on any competing technology, could you forward this information to them, so their marketing people can help out on their respective camp statement.

Upwards,

Brent Allsop


236
General Discussion / Re: Canonizer.com DAC
« on: January 02, 2014, 03:43:16 am »

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the response, I missed setting notify for this, so didn't see your response till now.

I am going to make an attempt to describe the business logic, but will probably get much wrong, so I'm interested in any and all help with this.

First, let me point out that we do have some funding available if anyone is willing to work on an hourly bases to get a Canonizer DAC up running, and integrated with Canonizer.com.  Currently we are offering any of the following funding options for one hour of work:

    A: One share of Canonizer.com
    B: 0.75 share of Canonizer.com $25
    C: 0.5 share of Canonizer.com and $50.
    D: 0.25 share of Canonizer.com $75

You can also currently purchase these shares for $100 each.

For more information about what these 'shares' of canonizer.com are, and disclaimers, see:

http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/4

We are interested in being able to allocate new Canonizer.com DAC shares for each of the shares already being earned.

And of course, as you pointed out we could do, we are interested in implementing a system so that people can use these shares to invest in, or short various theoretical 'camps' at Canonizer.com.  We'd like everyone to be able to track the investments and shorts of each camp, comparatively, along with other select able 'canonizer' algorithms.

Ideally, all new coins would be allocated for doing this kind of work, determined in a leaderless distributed expert consensus canonized way.  It'd be great if no mining was required at all.  Possibly just have a small transaction fee going to people processing the blocks, or whatever is the best expert determined way to do all this.

The goal of Canonizer.com is to first find out and communicate, concisely and quantitatively, what everyone wants.  Then the goal is to achieve it all, for everyone, without getting in the way of what anyone else may want (as can be documented in competing camps).  The idea is, that as soon as you achieve enough consensus, or find enough people that want the same thing you do, it will just happen, one way or another.  And having some DACs supporters could contribute to fund such efforts to get things done would be a great boon to getting things done.  And allocating coins to get work done, according to what everyone wants, seems like the best 'proof of work' for new coins possible!?  Could any other crypto currency come up with a better way to control and allocate new coins than such a leaderless amplified wisdom of the crowd way?  Governments allocate new fiat currencies to do what the dumb government hierarchy wants, surely we can do that all in a distributed, leaderless expert consensus meritocracy amplified wisdom of the crowd determined way?


Does that help as a start to how the business logic of a Canonizer.com DAC would work?  Any of you may have way better ideas of how to do this.

What else is required?

Thanks

Brent Allsop

237
Marketplace / Loan me 10 protoshares?
« on: December 24, 2013, 02:12:14 pm »

I need 10 protoshares to do this in time, but cryptsy.com is down, and I don't have another way to purchase them before the deadline.

Can someone loan me 10 shares for this?  If you can, please contact me at brent.allsop at canonizer.com

Thanks

Brent Allsop


238
General Discussion / Canonizer.com DAC
« on: December 18, 2013, 10:14:37 pm »
Canonizer.com is an open survey system that gives shares to people that contribute 1 hour, or $100 to Canonizer.com.  We desperately need to implement a DAC to manage these shares.  Or, people can collect $50, and .5 shares, for one hour of work, for example.

We also want to create a futures system, so people can bet Canonizer.com DAC shares on various theories.

If anyone is able to help with implementing such, as soon as possible, you can earn shares and money.


239

Me 300, I want in 2, I mean 300.


240
Bitshares requires some established blockchain to ride on top of, correct?
Even if Bitcoin aproaches a near worthless value, and the trading valume also drops similarely, it will still work to have Bitshares ride on top of it, right?

And also, how hard would it be, if Bitshares started up, and ran on the Bitcoin block chain, for a while, how hard would it be to switch this to some other block chain that was out competing Bitcoin?


Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17