ok thanks. I found this one
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/lets-talk-bitcoin-129-dogeparty-and-delegated-proof-of-stake

is there a more recent podcast with them both?

+100%
Brilliant. This is so important.

Perhaps Bitshares could include a feature to generate a special HD Public Key which they can provide to each unique contact to maintain privacy to generate an infinite number of target addresses for payments to you. That way your privacy is better maintained. Ninki calls this "Air-gapped Address Exchange".
http://ninki.ghost.io/2015/03/17/ninki-bitcoin-air-wallet/

Problem for bitcoiners is that all your contacts must have the Ninki wallet to get the features. It may be a long while before other wallets start to incorporate the feature. Since bitshares it just getting started it could be included in all wallets by default.

Done my first short now when I press "Cover" under the Open Margin Orders section I see options for what appears to be a market order to cover.
But is there a way to cover with a limit order or will it force me to cover exactly at the current feed price?

Great. Thanks a lot.

He seems to be looking into adding Bitshares though...? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946174.msg10558914#msg10558914

Yeah they will add bitshares for sure since its #4 at coinmarketcap.com. The issue for bitshares though is that a huge marketing opportunity could be missed. All this effort that is being spent on marketing yet the low hanging fruit of putting basic bitcoin wallet features into the bitshares client is still hanging. Also the first mover status in the crypto space is huge for marketing and having all the bitcoin/altcoiners jumping onto their atomic cross-chain trading(ACCT) bandwagon instead of bitshares would be a downer. Its not impossible to imagine that another alt-coin will come up with a viable bitUSD competitor and if the Mercury client wins the "smart wallet" race then BTS could become *completely* obsolete. This risk should be nipped in the bud asap.

In the latest bitshares.tv episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWVlqz7Ejf8) Max also highlighted bitcoin wallet features and atomic cross-chain trading as the big touch-down for bitshares. Max is spot on! He predicts Q2 this year for delivery. But I am mildly concerned since I didn't hear the topic discussed yet in the bitshares hangouts (https://soundcloud.com/beyond-bitcoin-hangouts). Bytemaster said in the last hangout that BTER hack was terrible for bitshares price in the short term. Why should bitshares maintain dependencies that can damage the BTS price when it can stand alone without dependencies on external services as the ultimate "smart wallet" crypto-diversification tool? If I hear Bytemaster announce bitcoin wallet and ACCT features then I am buying more BTS. It will be so much easier to buy unlimited BTS when the client has these features. The bitshares community should not depend on shapeshift.io, Mercury or other bitcoin wallet providers. 

Going beyond bitcoin and ACCT features the bitshares delegate model is also capable of escrowing any kind of prediction trading! The Bitshares delegate model is the only existing blockchain that allows human brain crunching into the oracle scripting mix yet it isn't leveraging this capability yet. The client could support a tool for delegates and investors to aggregate "price feed" questions wherever there is enough demand to fuel liquidity. For example: "Who will win POTUS in 2016?". Anyway this is a much lower priority than bitcoin and ACCT features.   

BTW my view currently is Bytemaster and the bitshares developers are doing an awesome job and that is why I will continue to buy BTS on the dips. Awesome work guys delivering early and often! Absolutely love it! My comments regarding new feature suggestions for the client are meant only for adding fodder into the community head space - I'm just an investor and there are many aspects of bitshares development I don't understand.

"Mercury - The world's first trustless cryptocurrency exchange"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946174.0;all

Bitcoiners are getting excited about Mercury which is still in alpha. Bitshares can steal their thunder and attract bitcoin investors by adding atomic cross-chain trading features into the BTS client before they do. As mentioned here this is technically possible with bitshares. This would open a big decentralized gateway allowing the flow of unlimited bitcoins into bitshares.

Bitshares is well positioned to be the first and ultimate smart wallet. But Mercury appears to also be well positioned. We can request Mercury to include BTS and bitUSD but what if they include a bitUSD competitor instead? Are we at their mercy? Of course bitshares is still first mover on cfd type bitassets so it probably will be included. But winning the smart wallet race would be imho awesome for bitshares. Bitshares should be the world's first trustless cryptocurrency exchange.

I ended up shorting some to myself at price feed

I understand this will leave you with both a short and a long which in effect cancel each other out. So you may just be wasting fees and exposing yourself to margin call risks. Is there any reason why anybody would want to create shorts to buy themselves?