Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - robrigo

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 37
406
General Discussion / Re: 2020: A Call For DApps & DAO's
« on: September 16, 2014, 12:00:04 am »
-------------------------------

2020: A Call For DApps & DAO's

http://koinify.com/blog/2020-a-call-for-dapps-and-daos/

--------------------------------

Hey guys,

We're writing to share with you our vision of how we see the future, and where we see this decentralized application industry taking us. With the 2020: A Call For DApps & DAO's - we lay out where we see these companies going, and what we believe will foster development, growth, and adoption of this technology as a whole.

--------------------------------


Hey Tom!  Welcome to the BitShares community  :)

I'll take this opportunity to share my vision of a DAC I've been working on.

My name is Brian Falther and I believe from now through the next couple of decades, we're going to see the emergence of DACs for the production of physical items.  I think one way to think about it could be "the internet of things 2.0" or what I've been referring to in conversations with close friends as "the blockchain of things" movement (...there's already evidence that others are thinking about this too - IBM's proposed Adept platform).  I'm super excited to see the 'physical infrastructure' section on your blog post!

The DAC we're working on is a decentralized autonomous food production platform called Future Tech Farm.  This analogy is still fresh, so let me know if it makes sense: it's like Uber, but for farming.  We want to build a platform where anyone can be a farmer without any geographic, or knowledge-based prerequisites.  Our goal is to enable anyone to grow food for themselves, their family, and properly incentivize them to grow for others too.  Imagine hyper-local produce delivered via drones to your doorstep for less than what you'd pay at Walmart with higher quality than what you'd find at Whole Foods.  We believe this is the point in history where farming will follow what the computer industry did in the 50's & 60's; from large mainframes with umbilical-corded terminals to PCs... same analogy for farming.  This is the first time in history its becoming technologically and economically feasible.

The concept is based upon this fact I believe to be true:  If food production existed solely on technology (which is developing at an exponential rate and eliminates all uncontrolled variables, like weather); the cost of growing food will be that of electricity.  If anyone else is a Singularitist like myself, you'd agree with the hypothesis of the law of accelerating returns which will enable the cost of electricity to continually approach zero until it's too cheap to meter. 

Here's the end game: What would the world be like if food were essentially free and required no human labor inputs?  My hypothesis is there will be a massive amount of cognitive surplus to work on developing creativity-based solutions (something computer don't quite do well yet...).  People would have the opportunity to work on what they want to do, not work a job they don't like because they HAVE to, in order to put food on the table...     

Not everyone will agree with me but I believe farming to be one of the most broken industries in existence today.  The vast majority of food isn't being grown for taste or nutrition anymore - it's being grown to travel (at the unnecessary expense of precious resources).   

I'd be happy to go into further detail about the platform may potentially operate, but the basics are as follows:
  • People will autonomously grow their own fresh produce in a home grow system (size will range from 'desktop' to scalable, modular & expandable systems the size of large rooms or a basement)
  • Each personal home grow system will be outfitted with a sensory system collecting data from every variable needed to grow
  • Every node will be connected to each other and each node on the network will be constantly striving to be as efficient as the most efficient node in the network (a machine learning neural network with a positive feedback loop)
  • Monetization, incentives, & tracking/security of the food produced will be logged with blockchains

The UX would be something like an Amazon Fresh front end and food would be delivered to (or harvested directly at) your living space, exactly when you need it.

After searching for over 2 years on how this system may be able to monitor and track the network at scale, AND has the ability to monetize & incentivize the bootstrapping of the network; I landed on bitcoin and blockchain technology. ...As a technologically objective engineer - I quickly found my way to the BitShares community and the rest - is history [in the making]  ;D.  Much like BitShares, we're looking to create an industry that solves problems for billions of people.  Over the next 3-5 years, we'll be engineering the initial hardware development for the grow systems and bootstrap the development of the network to bring it online.  I imagine many many opportunities for embedded systems startups to work in the space. 

My background is Mechanical Engineering, my co-founder is also a mechanical engineer currently working on his Master's in Robotics at Northwestern.  We're in the active mode of putting together a world-class team to begin operating in stealth.  There isn't a doubt in my mind that BitShares (both the technology and the community) will play a very large role in realizing this vision.  If you'd like to learn more about myself, my co-founder and our progress over the past few years, check out: http://www.futuretechfarm.com/about/#founders.  There are a couple of videos of public pitches we've made, along with some of the details from our early investors & pre-seed funding.  We're working on building out the roadmap for our seed round of funding now.  I would love to initiate conversation about working with the BitShares community, and core dev team, to do so through the BitShares ecosystem within the next year.  Any questions - feel free to send me a PM, e-mail (contact info on website), or shoot a tweet to @brianfalther or @futuretechfarm. I'd also be more than happy to chat on Google Hangout, Skype, or the BitShares mumble server.

To give you an idea with where we're at now, the most recent development for FTF is with regards to continuing the next phase build out of our team.  I'm a big fan of Peter Diamandis and the work he has done.  Peter has developed a mastermind group of entrepreneurs and exponential thinkers from all over the world who meet each year in January to discuss emerging technologies and philosophies that will change the world as we know it.  The name of this group is called Abundance 360 (here's the website: http://abundance360summit.com/ - Apply! I'm sure many of you would also be a great fit).  I sent in my application a few weeks back, went through an interview last week, and was accepted.  I don't personally have the money to pay for the membership and make the trip, but will be crowdfunding my way there (keep an eye out in the near future... I'll be looking for sponsors!)  I know if I can get in front of Peter and his network of insane connections; we'll be able to put together the dream team needed to make this a reality.  There's also the added benefit of this year's summit having a module & discussion based entirely on bitcoin and blockchain tech - I'm SURE I can get in front of a crowd and speak about BitShares.

Peter was kind enough to make a personalized response to me too!
https://vimeo.com/106199286


If this resonates with anyone and you're interested in working with us - let me know!  My co-founder and I would love to have a conversation with you (we meet online weekly on Tuesdays at 8pm eastern - we'd be happy for you to jump into our hangout and chat about ideas and progress; BYOB)

Tom - if you'd be willing to cover what we're working on through Koinify, give me a shout! 

-Brian

TLDR; Robots, autonomously growing food for the whole world, based on blockchain tech.

Brian- I cannot wait to see this vision come to life. You guys have been working hard on Future Tech Farm for years now and it is great to see the tools needed to develop the "technical backbone" for such an autonomous food production system starting to come into existence with the rapid and continuing innovations happening in the blockchain space. I'm really looking forward to seeing what the Adept platform looks like and how it simplifies distributed IoT systems.

And man, talk about "big fish"! I will definitely support your crowd funding for the mastermind group, not only because introducing a bunch of forward thinking entrepreneurs to the DAC metaphor is never a bad thing; but also because I think both of these systems is a HUGE step towards equalization of standards of living across the globe. Let's change the world!

407
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:24:19 pm »
How do I git clone the develop branch? I am almost sure it's not this one: git clone https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx

I tried git clone https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/tree/develop/programs/market_maker   but that didn't work.

You had it right initially. git clone will clone the entire git repo; then you can switch to the develop branch by doing:


git checkout develop

Do you have 5 minutes to meet in the chat?

Just logged into #bitshares freenode IRC if you mean that.

408
Technical Support / Re: BTS X for the people?
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:10:48 pm »
Thanks for the answer.
Is there another trustworthy source to download the wallet?
Link on homepage is dead: http://bitshares-x.info/files/wallet/0.4.14/BitSharesX-v0.4.14.exe

Also here is the direct link to the releases page: https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx/releases

409
General Discussion / Re: Using BitsharesX platform for an ICO?
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:03:41 pm »
I'm researching for my next article, specifically in regard to ICO and how effective each platform might be for that style of business funding.

Has there been a case of any companies using the BitAsset system to raise funds yet? It seems like it would be an amazing tool for businesses (except that it currently costs over 6,000 USD worth of BTSX to create an asset which seems a tad excessive).

But cost aside, does anyone know of any organization even considering an ICO on the BitAsset platform?

There is a DAC called BitShares ME that will be more geared towards user issued assets, and thus cheaper to set up something like an ICO from. I am not sure who will be spearheading that particular fork of the bitshares toolkit.

410
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 14, 2014, 11:57:47 am »
How do I git clone the develop branch? I am almost sure it's not this one: git clone https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx

I tried git clone https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/tree/develop/programs/market_maker   but that didn't work.

You had it right initially. git clone will clone the entire git repo; then you can switch to the develop branch by doing:


git checkout develop

411
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 14, 2014, 11:31:16 am »
I'm in with some little stake .. let's see how to works out ...
can we have a modified version for btiGLD and bitCNY too?

I'm gonna check through the code .. maybe I can figure it out myself :)

There are a couple simple naming inconsistencies I found in the logging from running the latest market maker for a little bit...

In btsx.py:

line 87: "account_name" (no quotes) should be replaced with "account".

I saw another but it looks like it was already fixed.  ;) Those caused my bot to terminate.

412
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 13, 2014, 09:29:00 pm »
The latest develop branch has a revamped market maker bot architecture. I'm designing it in a way where it should be easy for people to write and share trading bots with configurable parameters.

New usage:

python main.py path_to_bot_config.json

It will create a new config with one default bot configured.
Edit this file with rpc client info and your bot settings.
You can look at the top of config.py to read more about the parameters.

Watch this space...

Bot frameworks 4 the win. I'm running it smoothly now alongside my GUI wallet.  8) Thanks toast.

413
General Discussion / Re: Marketing Proposal - Our Unfair Advantage
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:15:23 pm »
"We are all marketers now."

Let a thousand fiendishly clever evangelists bloom.

I love this quote. It sums up some ideas I've been kicking around lately. I'm a developer by trade but I am trying to come up with all kinds of ideas for getting people in rural communities to understand the potential for wealth redistribution in distributed crypto-secured transparent ledger systems. I know jobs are somewhat of a scarcity so people may not be able to afford to make any kind of investment; so I would like to formulate some way of incentivizing the spread of knowledge of block-chains and what not, but in an easy to digest fashion for my target audience (non technical folks, maybe some don't even go online yet). It would be great to allow those that become adopters to also be incentivized somehow to continue the spread of knowledge. This way people that are interested in becoming involved can both become invested, and learn more about it. One of the ways I was thinking to fund this "faucet" was by running a delegate campaign and developing my platform around this, with the delegate pay rate minus overhead going to the "learning" faucet. Lots of details to work out here (how to make the flow of value transparent? how to enable people who have to use other computers or only a smartphone for online use to keep their wallet in a secure fashion? building a web experience for this, etc.)

Now to make the time! Too many irons in the fire atm... might need to pull some out to make room for this one. There is much work to be done! This is something I see coming to fruition after the release of a lightweight client as well as a tested & vetted beta client release. I feel very passionate about bringing block-chains to the masses.

414
Technical Support / Re: Market order stuck pending [0.4.14][RESOLVED]
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:03:11 pm »
It was returned to the account like the order was never placed. Sorry i didn't clarify that.

415
Technical Support / Re: Market order stuck pending [0.4.14] [RESOLVED]
« on: September 13, 2014, 01:42:59 pm »
No idea why, but I logged into my wallet today and the "stuck" transaction finally updated! So I am guessing there is no bug in the market here, but rather it was a GUI issue. Which makes sense based on the fact that the commands above didn't recognize any transactions as pending. It was confusing because I had rescanned twice without it showing the correct balance as well as restarted the wallet client a few times.

416
Technical Support / Re: BTSX burned out
« on: September 13, 2014, 12:40:50 am »
Hi,

As i know, the total of BTSX is around 2 billions. I heard from someone that the BTSX share will be burned out over time. So in the next few year, the total of BTSX will not be 2 billions anymore. My question is that if i have 1000 BTSX in my wallet, over time, i don't do any transaction and just leave them sit in my wallet for long period of time, will all of my 1000 BTSX be burned out?

Thanks,

Transactions fees can be burned by delegates, because they can adjust a ratio of each fee that goes to themselves (pay), and to the shareholders (burn). Your 1000 BTSX will theoretically become more valuable over time because of this, as the burning of tx fees is equivalent to paying a dividend (less supply == higher buying power per share). Now, if you leave your wallet for over 1 year, you will lose 5% to inactivity fee. You can prevent that by moving your 1000 BTSX at least once per year.

417
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets on coinmarketcap
« on: September 12, 2014, 10:35:30 pm »

Robrigo suggested in the mumble hangout that we possibly we talk Gliss into having a separate tab for BitAssets.  I really like this idea once the market starts to take off.  No clue what it would take to have him do this, but it would be huge IMO.

I put forth the idea in his thread a bit ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.msg8796625#msg8796625

If it's a considerable amount of effort I feel as though we could come through as a community to donate to a small dev fund to "encourage" the maintainer Gliss.

418
Technical Support / Re: Market order stuck pending [0.4.14]
« on: September 12, 2014, 08:25:55 pm »
Code: [Select]
wallet_market_order_list USD BTSX?

No dice.

Code: [Select]
>> wallet_market_order_list USD BTSX

No market orders found.

419
Technical Support / Market order stuck pending [0.4.14][RESOLVED]
« on: September 12, 2014, 08:22:34 pm »
Seeing some weird behavior with a market order stuck in "pending". Basically I submitted the order, but realized that my client wasn't syncing (from messing around with the market maker script on the CLI using the same data-dir). So I regenerated everything in said data-dir (by renaming) except for the "wallets" dir, restarted the client, and re-synced the blockchain. Doing so left that market order "in limbo", where I can't see it as pending in the Open Orders screen, but I can see under my account transaction history that it is still pending.

I've tried the steps following the steps listed here: http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/RecoveringFunds



Code: [Select]
>> blockchain_list_pending_transactions

No pending transactions.

Code: [Select]
>> wallet_market_cancel_order c1cac1ca

20011 unknown_market_order: unknown market order
Cannot find that market order!
    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:4422 cancel_market_order

    {"order_id":"c1cac1ca00000000000000000000000000000000"}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:4503 cancel_market_order

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:1539 wallet_market_cancel_order

    {"command":"wallet_market_cancel_order"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:537 execute_command

Code: [Select]
>> wallet_recover_transaction c1cac1ca

20022 transaction_not_found: transaction not found
Transaction not found!
    {"transaction_id_prefix":"c1cac1ca"}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:5573 get_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3374 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:1763 wallet_recover_transaction

    {"command":"wallet_recover_transaction"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:537 execute_command

Has anyone else had to deal with market transactions stuck in pending?

420
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD Market Maker Live
« on: September 12, 2014, 05:52:01 pm »
Mine is running:

Code: [Select]
TYPE        QUANTITY            PRICE                         BALANCE             COST                COLLATERAL          ID                                 
================================================================================================================================
bid_order   5,005.18188 BTSX    0.03917587898743254 USD / BTSX196.0824 USD        196.0823 USD        N/A                 7a160369d1c67da0ecf6d9ca719219933f03d39e
ask_order   4,899.80000 BTSX    0.04113467293680417 USD / BTSX4,899.80000 BTSX    201.5516 USD        N/A                 7bd0600b46d2b5f0b1ad5b824335a0b5c96d4c54

Steps I took:

1) git clone the develop branch
2) Do the two submodule commands and then cmake .
3) make bitshares_client
4) ./bitshares_client --data-dir ~/.usd_market_maker
5) create_wallet <whatever>
6) import_private_key <some key from a trading account you created>
7) quit client and update the config.json with your desired user/pass. Add /rpc to the end of the https bit after the port
8 ) download the bot files from BM's link
9) edit main.py with your account name (make sure the account has at least 1001 BTSX and 100 USD (I went 4000/200)
10) python main.py user pass port true

Nice! Putting it in a separate data-dir is definitely a better idea; right now I am seeing problems after exiting the CLI wallet and trying to open the GUI where it isn't connecting me in the GUI. I clicked "Enable Transaction Scanning" but it is just kind of hung there atm. I changed the config.json parameters back to what they originally were but keeping a separate data-dir for this would probably prevent the issue I am seeing.

I will probably rename everything in the data-dir except for the wallet and see if that fixes my issue.

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 37