241
General Discussion / Re: can we analysis how much true users in 32800+ id?
« on: January 26, 2015, 04:56:36 pm »
I'm working on calculating this
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
242
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Bitshareshome(www.bts.hk) Joined the Compaign of BTS Delegates
« on: January 26, 2015, 04:56:04 pm »
Why do you need 100% for this?
243
General Discussion / Re: Litecoin up 30% today, Coinbase adding Litecoin tomorrow?
« on: January 25, 2015, 08:41:51 pm »Stellar?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
If it's any alt project this one would make the most sense with the announcement theme. Does Coinbase have any ties to Ripple?
Maybe they are pulling a Xapo and putting BTC wallets in space... i.e. their "Vault" functionality would be based on satellite harbored wallets.
not sure about ties to ripple but I'm sure they have ties to Circle which backed stellar's team with $3m
244
General Discussion / Re: Litecoin up 30% today, Coinbase adding Litecoin tomorrow?
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:48:28 pm »
Stellar?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
245
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegates reports
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:15:00 pm »What makes a vote day a vote day?Lots of people vote
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
246
General Discussion / Re: Up to 27 100% delegates. Really?
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:04:46 pm »
This will be easier to address when delegates are reduced to block producers and all inflation to fund projects is done via proposals with escrows. Until then the low voter participation will make it easier for bad delegates to get and stay in.
People need to use "filler" delegates more aggressively so that an elected delegate actually represents majority approval. Like one guy runs several delegates for a low pay and people fill their recommendation list up with his delegates.
People need to use "filler" delegates more aggressively so that an elected delegate actually represents majority approval. Like one guy runs several delegates for a low pay and people fill their recommendation list up with his delegates.
247
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegates reports
« on: January 25, 2015, 05:39:59 pm »
Someone should organized unofficial weekly vote days to complement this renewed interest in delegate transparency. Maybe after fuzz's hangouts or during the weekend.
248
General Discussion / Re: Bter Scam
« on: January 25, 2015, 04:45:18 pm »
yeah, bter is fine, you got hacked.
249
General Discussion / Re: My Plan for Bitshares In Real Estate
« on: January 24, 2015, 08:06:20 pm »
Guys, he's not inviting you all to be the shareholders of his company and make decisions. He doesn't need your trust in how profitable he is or how he manages the company, he just wants to use our ledger system for his shareholders.
I think this is a good idea. Have you been able to talk to someone like stan or DACx about this?
I think this is a good idea. Have you been able to talk to someone like stan or DACx about this?
250
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Python script to put portions of delegate pay into markers at or below the feed
« on: January 24, 2015, 06:23:36 pm »I don't know about this. Doesn't this make the incentives imbalanced? Doesn't this put centralized influence into the free-market system? I'm not an economist, but this doesn't seem kosher to me.
Would it be kosher if delegates did it by hand instead? Some of us want to hedge 30% for tax reasons, for example.
Delegates don't have to run this
251
Technical Support / Re: Did I just find a bug in the client or is some other force at work here?
« on: January 24, 2015, 06:06:23 pm »From your screenshot, we can find that the orders executed at 86.4393 indeed.
It's a feature.
If someone (say Alice) asks 1 usd for 86 bts, and another one (say Bob) bids 1 usd at 94 bts, both of them will get what they want: Alice will get 86 bts and pay 1 usd, and Bob will get 1 usd and pay 94 bts. The difference (94-86=8bts) will be destroyed (as fee).
Is this really better than having the distributed automated market find the lowest seller or highest bidder for me? That sort of automation in finding best price would be the real feature IMO, but I think it would allow front-running so BM decided to go the other way. I am not sure tho..
I don't think this is better than automated matching of the lowest and highest bidders. If I want to buy 100 BitUSD at market rate on an exchange that only allows limit orders, and I see that the lowest ask is only for 80, while the 2nd lowest is for another 20, I would match my bid for the 2nd lowest ask, expecting to pay the lowest ask price on the first 80.
It allows front-running by the block producers who can put mix their own orders into the block in whatever order they want. There's nothing you can do about it, so we do the worst-case matching every time and keep the profit for shareholders instead.
252
General Discussion / Re: Proposal---Delegates inspectors group
« on: January 23, 2015, 11:28:47 pm »
Personal opinion that it should and also will happen
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
253
General Discussion / Re: Proposal---Delegates inspectors group
« on: January 23, 2015, 11:13:26 pm »
We want to separate delegates from workers and paid proposal and have all inflation require a majority of active votes
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
254
Technical Support / Re: Feasible? using wallet_import_private_key to replicate bitcoin's getnewaddress?
« on: January 23, 2015, 05:12:08 pm »
Thousands of addresses on one accouny is the correct way to do it. Many accounts per wallet is bad.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
255
General Discussion / Re: Proposal---Delegates inspectors group
« on: January 23, 2015, 05:09:12 pm »
Good idea
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
