256
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BlockPOS -Your favorite store can now accept any crypto thanx to Bitshares
« on: June 10, 2016, 12:28:26 am »
Looking forward to trying this at my establishment.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Some people here talk about delusion. This is not a real problem. The real problem is no real world use cases for bitshares. People invest in microsoft, because microsoft sells software to whole the world and makes gozillions $$. Apple sells a bunch of pretty shit which is dear for allfaggotsgays in the world. That is why their shares are valuable. And you still can lose money investing into them. What does bitshares sell? An exchange, which nobody wants to use. How do you expect your investment in BTS to appreciate in this case? Yes, I know, some idiots will reply: look I invested in ponzi pyramid shit ICO, which sells nothing but shitcoin, and doubled my investment in one week. Keep investing in ponzi pyramids, idiots, and you finally will lose more than you gained. Investing in ponzi pyramid is only profitable if there are enough more stupid idiots around you to invest after you.
Everything ok with the payouts? According to the website, a few payouts are not showing up in the wallet even though they are indicated on the website.
These seem to be skipped:
BTS brekyrse1f3 1174.62592118 4/6/2016 9:21:35 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 312.92976694 4/6/2016 6:47:31 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 289.77028151 2/24/2016 10:37:29 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 177.43976024 1/10/2016 11:09:19 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 77.08215620 1/6/2016 4:21:26 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 118.85506832 1/6/2016 6:16:54 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 74.32134320 1/4/2016 12:36:19 AM
I need to check the following when I get home, not sure if the "recent history" includes these or not since they are old. They also do not show up on CryptoFresh.
BTS brekyrse1f3 137.41309900 12/23/2015 10:57:38 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 1064.18212841 12/22/2015 1:04:47 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 233.54878255 12/20/2015 6:36:02 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 488.44238237 12/19/2015 1:19:23 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 765.26706888 12/17/2015 12:41:03 PM
BTS brekyrse1f3 766.43377861 12/16/2015 10:31:40 AM
BTS brekyrse1f3 403.46890751 12/15/2015 12:40:40 AM
This issue has been brought to the attention of the devs.
Thanks for taking the time to comment arhag. I'm no expert on cryptography, but it sounds like you and @bytemaster disagree about the viability and security of using the blockchain as the wallet backup medium. My perspective was similar to what you said in your first few sentences above, until BM came along the other week and said the encryption wasn't that safe against brute force methods.
When bytemaster says encryption isn't safe against brute force methods, he is talking about encrypting using a user-chosen password and publishing the (poorly encrypted) data to the public. If you do not allow the user to set the password but force them to use a key with 256 bits of computer generated entropy that they keep safe locally, then there is no brute force issue. It just means recovery is slightly more annoying than typing in your password in a new client. You are forced to get out your paper backup and type in a longer sequence of random dictionary words into the new client.He explained an important difference was the delays imposed between each guess attempt by front door time outs and other measures which wouldn't exist in a blockchain backup scenario. It makes sense on the surface, but if such measures are so important in the security of the encryption which is the core security mechanism of the entire blockchain, it's far weaker than I thought. Frankly that seems highly unlikely.
So that is in the context where you trust a third-party server with your (poorly encrypted) backups. The server can then enforce rate limits on guessing passwords so that your weak password is good enough to prevent attackers from getting your (poorly encrypted) backup under their local control in the first place to then brute force. The problem with relying on third parties is that the third party may then be liable (at least morally if not legally) if their security is not good enough to prevent others from getting access to your (poorly encrypted) backups. And that isn't the only problem with third-party server backups. You need to trust that the third party won't brute force your poorly encrypted backup themselves. And what is even more of an issue is that if you are solely relying on the third-party server backups to not lose stealth funds (for example), what happens if the third-party company goes under (or loses all their data somehow) and does not or cannot offer you to download your backup even one last time? Unless you had other recent manual backups you might lose some of your funds in that scenario.
bitcoinfan has sent more than 20 mil BTS to poloniex. Massive dump coming
https://cryptofresh.com/u/bitcoinfan
He waits a little pump before he unloads, so he will "not get noticed"