Show Posts

1

General Discussion / Re: Bitshares at the cross roads

« on: August 17, 2019, 07:37:30 pm »

Quote

Should Bitshares community allow vote buying and concentration of voting power and are we fine with the consequences?

It does not really matter anymore, because Bitshares is already light years behind other projects out there in terms of development and infrastructure. Of course, BTS whales have no choice but to continue to simulate vigorous activity to keep it alive, because it is a pain in the a$$ to withdraw millions BTS without crashing the price to zero, but this is all going to no where.

2

BEOS / Re: BitShares EOS (BEOS) Launches - Get Yours

« on: April 25, 2019, 01:09:11 pm »

Rainfall, my ass. What a retarded kindergarden ))))

3

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01

« on: April 23, 2019, 12:40:50 pm »

Quote from: xeroc on April 23, 2019, 07:20:17 am

Quote from: yvv on April 19, 2019, 12:25:42 pm
This is very unlikely going to happen (about 0% chance). Real money goes to ether. Even bitshares creator realized this and made ICO for his new project on ether. Bitshares does not have any killer features anymore. The train is gone.
DanL actually wanted to run the crowdsale on bitshares. His business partners apparently didn't want to.

And they were right imo.

4

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01

« on: April 19, 2019, 12:25:42 pm »

Quote from: alt on April 17, 2019, 01:48:32 pm

the only way can help increase the supply is provide more real money support BTS.

This is very unlikely going to happen (about 0% chance). Real money goes to ether. Even bitshares creator realized this and made ICO for his new project on ether. Bitshares does not have any killer features anymore. The train is gone.

5

General Discussion / Re: Somebody might enlighten me why BSIP42 on BitUSD ?

« on: September 29, 2018, 05:30:44 pm »

Quote from: Customminer on September 29, 2018, 05:22:31 pm

Quote from: yvv on September 29, 2018, 05:07:49 pm
If this is not stopped, this would prove that dpos is a fatally flawed system, which can be easily manipulated just like mtgox.

To be fair, you can avoid these committee issues by creating/using a 'privatized' MPA. Bonus points for transfering asset ownership to null-account for permanent configuration. Under such conditions DPOS has no influence and thus is not flawed.

No, this is not me who should create a 'privatized' MPA. A guy, who wants to change a contract terms should do this. When I bought an MPA issued by committee, I signed up for a certain terms (as many other users) and I am not happy when somebody mess them up.

6

General Discussion / Re: Somebody might enlighten me why BSIP42 on BitUSD ?

« on: September 29, 2018, 05:07:49 pm »

There is a clear conflict of interests here, which some committee members are trying to resolve by brute force in favor of their mercantile interests against of interests of many users, making bullshit excuses like "we want to improve shit blah blah blah... ". Ok, conflicts of interests are inevitable in this business, but they should not be ever resolved like this. You can do what ever you want with new contracts, but you have to respect old contracts which you already made. You can't change parameters of bit asset which you issued on a wish of your ass, PERIOD.

If this is not stopped, this would prove that dpos is a fatally flawed system, which can be easily manipulated just like mtgox.

7

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP42: adjust price feed dynamically

« on: September 16, 2018, 05:23:37 pm »

This guy is trying to trick witnesses into preferring his private exchange for deriving a feed price. This is BULLSHIT! This is attack on the network, happening right now. This attack is initiated by few malicious committee members. Proxies, wake up and use your voting power to stop this!

8

General Discussion / Re: is it a goode idea to disable force settlement and black swan for bitCNY?

« on: September 16, 2018, 11:44:49 am »

Who voted this guy into committee? His retarded proposals, which are aimed to make his private exchange profitable, will kill all bitshares ecosystem. People, stop voting for him, or this network will convert into trash.

9

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP42: adjust price feed dynamically

« on: September 16, 2018, 11:39:57 am »

Quote from: bitcrab on September 15, 2018, 06:44:11 pm

data at this moment:
bitCNY: BTS price:0.818, feed price:0.917, premium:0.1%
bitUSD: BTS price:0.115, feed price:0.119, premium: 4%

BSIP42 worked fairly well on bitCNY, we need to apply it on bitUSD in the next step.

Bullshit! Right now

Feed price: 1.07539 BTS/CNY
Last price: 1.21065 BTS/CNY

(1.21065-1.07539)/1.07539~0.13, which is 13% premium, not 0.1%. Fix your calculator.

10

General Discussion / Re: Consider derailing feed price

« on: August 20, 2018, 06:28:03 pm »

Quote

In a downtrend, smart coins are always running with a premium

HAHA! What a surprise, right? Nobody wants to short bitUSD in a downtrend market. It is a natural human behavior and no manipulations with feed price will fix it. You may try to short appreciating asset yourself if you have some funds to lose

Any feed price producer is free to mess with their feeds as much as they want, but if you do harm to network, you may end up being kicked out of witnesses. Just go ahead, try and see what happens.

11