Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - btspp

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] btspp-witness(双语)
« on: December 11, 2018, 11:41:25 am »
Hello everyone.
We have released the English version to GooglePlay. Welcome to the download experience.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.bitshares.app

2
详情可在 https://t.me/officialbeos 群组里咨询。

3
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 09, 2018, 12:41:39 pm »
Hello Fabian
I hope you can take a look at our work proposal. Address: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0
I hope you vote for us. Thank you.

4
We have been on GooglePlay and added support for the English version. :) :)
GooglePlay:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.bitshares.app

5
looks good will vote asap.

please make the language files available so the community can help translate your app.

great work!

Thanks for voting.
We will submit an English version to googleplay as soon as possible.
When we are ready, we will open source as soon as possible, and the community can come to help translate it.

6
I like it) Good luck!

Thanks ~~ :) :)

It will get better, please vote for us.

7
中文(Chinese) / Re: api交易失败的问题
« on: December 04, 2018, 04:09:58 am »
嗯,只是广播出去不一定会进块(可能遇到许多原因失败。)最好是等到callback返回,拿到txid才算ok。

8
We would be hesitant to vote until it is open sourced on Github. If this is a community project then this should be #1 priority and should already be possible given codebase already exists.

Hello George, thank you for your reply.
Our team is also working on the code as soon as possible.
And our team is currently in contact with bitshares.org and we want to host the repository under the bitshares account.
These may take some time. So we estimate that it is about 6 weeks open source.
Of course, we will advance this as soon as possible. Please be assured that we will definitely open source.

I hope you support our workers. Thank you.

9
中文(Chinese) / Re: api交易失败的问题
« on: December 04, 2018, 03:07:04 am »
返回成功,并不一定会成功进块。要callback成功才会包含在区块里。

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: December 04, 2018, 02:36:37 am »
Blckchnd 2018 Q3 Witness report can be found HERE

Nice work.
Hello blckchnd
Can you look at our worker proposal?
If you feel good, I hope you can vote for us.
Forum: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0
Thank you~

11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: December 03, 2018, 02:52:27 pm »
since bitsharestalk.io is unusable

voted for BSIP43 + 44

Hello fav, can you look at this worker proposal? http://Https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0

12
中文(Chinese) / Re: 【讨论】后BSIP42时代bitCNY的规则改进
« on: December 03, 2018, 02:42:11 pm »
2.1和2.2部分,我不觉得这样喂溢价合适。如果有人觉得见证人操作喂价,他们也会认定操作溢价。没什么区别。反而这样会失去灵活性,如果这种方式最后发现不太合适。要修改,估计又需要等到下次分叉了。

关于mssr我建议动态调整,可以根据一定规则评估黑天鹅风险系数。风险系数大的时候mssr增加,鼓励搬砖吃爆仓单。风险系数小的时候mssr降低。

那你觉得怎样合适呢?

MSSR也搞动态的话感觉太复杂了。

喂的数据还是直接喂“价格”就行,只是算法调整,保留灵活性。
MSSR动态确实需要一些规则,复杂性会上升。目前来说就固定测试一些参数就可。105 102都可以测测看到底哪些适合。

13
中文(Chinese) / Re: 【讨论】后BSIP42时代bitCNY的规则改进
« on: December 03, 2018, 01:52:02 pm »
2.1和2.2部分,我不觉得这样喂溢价合适。如果有人觉得见证人操作喂价,他们也会认定操作溢价。没什么区别。反而这样会失去灵活性,如果这种方式最后发现不太合适。要修改,估计又需要等到下次分叉了。

关于mssr我建议动态调整,可以根据一定规则评估黑天鹅风险系数。风险系数大的时候mssr增加,鼓励搬砖吃爆仓单。风险系数小的时候mssr降低。

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 03, 2018, 12:34:29 pm »
Hello xeroc
It is convenient to look at this proposal, we believe in terms of time cost and product integrity. This has certain advantages.
In addition, we would like to invite you to join the proposal account multi-sign management. I don't know if you are interested.
Proposal address: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27486.0
Thank your for the offer! I much appreciate the trust you put in me.
The only issue that I am facing is time. I feel that I cannot perform the
amount of review that would be expected from me when being part
of this multisig group.

Very regrettable.
However, abit and jademont have already participated. I don't know if you can understand our worker proposal, we need you to vote for us.
thank you very much.

15
OpenLedger has also recently submitted a bill for developers of mobile app. I think we should have a good communication to find out what is necessary and what is not necessary, so as to avoid repetitive work and pay too much money.

Of course, we also seriously compared the openledger app. I believe that we have certain advantages in terms of time cost and product quality. However, we will continue to communicate with the other side, hoping to achieve a cooperative approach.

Hello, would be happy to discuss way to collaborate. We can talk here, also you can reach me at @charyury in Telegram.

Can you pm my telegram, @syalon. I seem to have restrictions on sending you messages.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4