Need arbitration on a problem or dispute? Let neural-networks and global voting systems be part of the process. Both parties might agree to a binding decision, and allocation of dues as a result. Why would people in dispute do this? If they believed a system to be inscrutably fair and just, they might consider it over current costly alternatives. Those shareholders weighing-in on a decision might lose or gain depending on the final majority consensus, and they might profit by the outcome decision, but the key here, though (surely?), is to dissociate the algorithmic decision by the DAC and a public vote. Public opinion on multiple decisions, however, might (somehow, independent of market forces) be fairly programmed to affect subsequent decisions, ultimately to evolve into an autonomous independent self-learning DAC.

Team, anyone?

1. Logo designer
2. International lawyer
3. Coin developer

Ideas welcome...

Would it best to separate out patents and copyright into different DACs? Two big topics...

Additional PM just sent

I made several withdrawals, largest one was 1000+ pts, didn't have issue. 

To be safe, it's always better to limit your risk by keeping smaller balance and making more frequent transfers though.

Can back this up - no issues for me. Questions handled promptly. Lots PTS transferred out without a problem.

It was up for a while, but down again now...

Is this pool functioning at the moment? Getting some invalid shares, may not have set it up right. - edit ok it seems to be churning away now. noob alert, i think i had something else running in background that was stalling it.

I have tested this, with a few protoshare trades, and its nicely done. Just confirming that I was able to withdraw protoshares.

I can test...