Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pgbit

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16
1
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: redeeming of PTS AGS
« on: July 23, 2017, 09:45:01 am »
Did you try this helpful guide:

https://steemit.com/muse/@ash/how-to-move-open-muse-to-muse-important-needed-for-the-new-blockchain-do-asap

2
Technical Support / Re: Can I recover my coins from 3 years ago?
« on: June 17, 2017, 07:36:34 pm »
Try links from this topic:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24123.0/topicseen.html

3
Technical Support / Re: BitShare Migration 2.0
« on: October 12, 2015, 09:25:16 pm »
Ok. Thanks. I'm stuck on 98%!

4
Technical Support / Re: BitShare Migration 2.0
« on: October 12, 2015, 08:25:15 pm »
Daft question maybe: does the wallet need to fully sync?

5
General Discussion / Re: Please stop changing the rules of the game
« on: August 23, 2015, 12:59:06 pm »
Where's the summary of brownie points sharedrop? Missed the details...

6
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: July 14, 2015, 09:52:49 pm »
Anyone know the reason for the transaction spike on 17 Jun?
http://bitsharesblocks.com/charts/transactions


Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 14, 2015, 06:55:06 pm
Quote from: Blazin8888 on July 14, 2015, 06:47:32 pm
Two questions..


1. What has been the ATH of BTS


2. Where do you guys see 2015s ATH reaching after Bitshares 2.0 drops?

here's a cool price chart:

http://bitsharesblocks.com/charts/prices

no clue where BTS price will end up, but i'm bullish :)

7
Random Discussion / Re: Chrome is listening to you right now...
« on: June 25, 2015, 11:15:56 pm »
chrome://settings

Settings > Show advanced Settings > Privacy > Content settings Privacy <---- manage permissions here

8
General Discussion / Re: BitLicense
« on: June 25, 2015, 07:00:59 pm »
http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/06/19/bitlicense-shots-down-another-bitcoin-company-in-new-york/

9
General Discussion / Re: BitLicense
« on: June 25, 2015, 05:24:23 pm »
Quote from: luckybit on June 25, 2015, 05:16:51 pm
Quote from: bytemaster on June 24, 2015, 08:48:16 pm
Please brainstorm every rationale why you think Cryptonomex needs to apply for a BitLicense.

How might it apply to us and our partners?

Compliance is a long term strategic advantage and a short term competitive advantage. The fact that Bitshares allows for compliance is a long term competitive advantage.
What is the cost of a BitLicense, and is that cost sustainable in the current financial environment?

10
Technical Support / Windows 10 upgrade
« on: June 25, 2015, 04:48:55 pm »
Any news on if the current bitshares client works with the dev version? Any caution about upgrading at present?

11
General Discussion / Re: 21's new mining chip name
« on: May 18, 2015, 09:54:28 pm »
A mining chip with an almost identical name. Oh the irony...

12
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 30, 2015, 09:18:44 am »
Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on April 30, 2015, 08:31:53 am
Quote from: pgbit on April 30, 2015, 08:24:53 am
Ohhhh. So existing BitGold is not the same as BitGold 3.0?
We don't know yet how they will be "coexisting" .. BM hasn't told us yet .. let's see
For what its worth, my own view is that it very definitely should be the same, to enhance overall stability and trust in the network.

13
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 30, 2015, 08:24:53 am »
Quote from: maqifrnswa on April 26, 2015, 11:20:47 pm
Quote from: pgbit on April 26, 2015, 10:01:05 pm
To clarify, BitAssets 3.0 might replace existing BitAssets eg BitGold with a new hard fork at some stage? Will BitAssets that currently exist be mapped straight into the 3.0 system?

from BM's friday comments on beyond bitcoin: BTA3.0 will coexist with the current system, but BM expects that the new system will be preferred. The old system will naturally wind down, and if it totally winds down it could be disabled with a hardfork.
Ohhhh. So existing BitGold is not the same as BitGold 3.0?

14
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 26, 2015, 10:01:05 pm »
To clarify, BitAssets 3.0 might replace existing BitAssets eg BitGold with a new hard fork at some stage? Will BitAssets that currently exist be mapped straight into the 3.0 system?

15
DAC PLAY / How random is random
« on: April 09, 2015, 02:59:30 pm »
At the core of many systems is a trusted random number generator, but it seems that some software libraries that perform this function are not completely random - for various reasons. It might seem reasonable to mix RND methods. How does the Play random number generator work and how has it been validated to prove randomness?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 23 queries.