Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Customminer

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 31
61
General Discussion / Re: BTS dropped from Shapeshift? Alternatives?
« on: March 15, 2018, 11:47:47 pm »
The flyp.me devs seemed in support of Bitshares on Telegram, I'd imagine that the foundation reaching out to them would be successful.

62
General Discussion / Re: Unfortunately, it seems clear to me ..
« on: March 15, 2018, 11:47:01 pm »
> Dan has gone off the deep end about the privacy topic,

Dan is not involved in BTS anymore, so who cares?

> Stan is all about regulation and playing nice with the SEC now

One can certainly have private transactions whilst still being SEC compliant.

> Could it be that I'm just out of the loop?

Yes. https://t.me/Agorise

63
Oh dang, I was enjoying those low fees  :'( haha

64
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: March 12, 2018, 11:54:03 pm »
Had an interesting discussion with an user on the /r/cryptomarkets subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/811cv0/hertz_an_oscillating_usd_pegged_algorithm_based/dv01paz/

Their idea for algorithm based assets:

65
Don't want market fees? Use Hertz :D http://open-explorer.io/#/assets/HERTZ

67
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@stan/bitshares-org-gets-long-awaited-face-lift

Stan/Cryptonomex apparently just transferred ownership of bitshares.org to Apasia.tech - a for-profit entity that isn't an active witness/committee member nor a part of the Bitshares foundation.

Is anyone else concerned by this? Wouldn't it have been more appropriate for the ownership transfer to have been made to the committee, witnesses or to the bitshares foundation instead of a private for-profit company?

Take precautions - I'd consider using the light wallet over the reference org wallet until we know what's going on.

Cheers

68
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] - Ledger Nano S
« on: March 11, 2018, 08:29:20 pm »
AFAIK it's in the core dev roadmap.

69
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-whitepaper-google-translated-to-chinese-simplified

I hope google translate suffices, I'd greatly appreciate any input on the contents of the Hertz whitepaper!

我希望谷歌翻译足够了,我非常感谢赫兹白皮书内容的任何输入!

Thanks  :)

谢谢

70
A market pegged asset' supply is created only as a result of a user "borrowing" it into existence by locking some other asset as collateral (usually BTS).

If you were to create a bitWAVES MPA, you would need to also convince witness nodes to provide a price feed for Waves in order to have a 'fair price' for the Asset.

Read more about MPAs here : http://docs.bitshares.org/bitshares/user/mpa.html

Doesn't need to be solely witnesses, it could be the committee (unlikely you'd get many publishers), or you could manually configure private price feed publishers (any Bitshares accounts, up to 25 for now).

72
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] magicwallet.witness
« on: March 09, 2018, 09:41:11 am »
Would you be interested in publishing price feeds for the Hertz Algorithm Based Asset on the Bitshares DEX? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26013.0
Yes, we are doing research about alt's btsprice script and forks. will add Hertz later.
Cool, AFAIK btsprice is no longer actively maintained - perhaps a community focused repo would be more productive than everyone maintaining their own fork? There's a 750 bitUSD bounty on implementing Hertz in btsprice too :D

Give me a shout when you're planning to publish hertz feeds & I'll add your witness to the approved price feed publisher list.

Cheers :D

73
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] magicwallet.witness
« on: March 08, 2018, 10:35:04 pm »
Would you be interested in publishing price feeds for the Hertz Algorithm Based Asset on the Bitshares DEX? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26013.0

74
Attempting to perform direct JSON requests to these api nodes fails: https://eu.nodes.bitshares.works/

Code: [Select]
11 eof_exception: End Of File
stringstream
    {}
    th_a  sstream.cpp:109 peek

    {"str":""}
    th_a  json.cpp:478 from_string

For the mean time, I'll be removing these nodes from the HUG REST API (only when performing these json requests). Cheers

That is how actually the expected response, nothing broken there. Do you have an example of a node that behaves differently?

Depends on the node, but here's the output from this script: https://github.com/BTS-CM/Bitshares-HUG-REST-API/blob/master/work_in_progress/testing_requests.py

Other online nodes work properly.

Code: [Select]
./\/\/\.
Not online: https://bitshares.crypto.fans/ws
.\/\/\/.
---
Online: https://bit.btsabc.org/ws
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
---
Online: https://api.bts.blckchnd.com
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
---
Online: https://openledger.hk/ws
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
---
Online: https://bitshares-api.wancloud.io/ws
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
...
Error: https://dex.rnglab.org
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='dex.rnglab.org', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:777)'),))
...
./\/\/\.
Not online: https://dexnode.net/ws
.\/\/\/.
---
Online: https://kc-us-dex.xeldal.com/ws
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
---
Online: https://la.dexnode.net/ws
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
...
Error: https://eu.nodes.bitshares.works
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='eu.nodes.bitshares.works', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:777)'),))
...
...
Error: https://us.nodes.bitshares.works
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='us.nodes.bitshares.works', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:777)'),))
...
...
Error: https://sg.nodes.bitshares.works
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='sg.nodes.bitshares.works', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:777)'),))
...

---

Update: Added 'verify=False' to the request and got the expected output with warnings:

Code: [Select]
/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py:858: InsecureRequestWarning: Unverified HTTPS request is being made. Adding certificate verification is strongly advised. See: https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced-usage.html#ssl-warnings
  InsecureRequestWarning)
---
Online: https://eu.nodes.bitshares.works
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py:858: InsecureRequestWarning: Unverified HTTPS request is being made. Adding certificate verification is strongly advised. See: https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced-usage.html#ssl-warnings
  InsecureRequestWarning)
---
Online: https://us.nodes.bitshares.works
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===
/lib/python3.6/site-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py:858: InsecureRequestWarning: Unverified HTTPS request is being made. Adding certificate verification is strongly advised. See: https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced-usage.html#ssl-warnings
  InsecureRequestWarning)
---
Online: https://sg.nodes.bitshares.works
<Response [200]>
{"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":100}
===

---

So if it's the SSL cert, please update this to A+, B grade seems insufficient: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=eu.nodes.bitshares.works

https://certbot.eff.org/ certbot/letsencrypt can provide grade 'A' SSL certs for free.

75
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Legal Council about BTS and No-action
« on: March 07, 2018, 11:06:59 pm »
How is this progressing?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 31