Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 54
1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« on: May 26, 2020, 07:45:45 pm »
Reject.

2
lower USD threshold

Remove the threshold, provide real price feeds. 2 instances of months long bailouts to the detriment of BTS, bad debtors need to face reality.

3
Quote
bitAssets include bitCNY´╝î bitUSD

Why include known scam coins in this? Reject.

4
Give 24hrs notice then publish the real price. The bitassets have not had their peg for almost a year, as is they are dead scam coins with zero future.

5
Reject.

6
General Discussion / Re: Info about scamcoins?
« on: April 30, 2020, 09:06:43 pm »
List of known scamcoins: bitUSD, bitCNY

7
General Discussion / Re: Does it make sense to cultivate bitEUR?
« on: April 25, 2020, 11:17:37 am »
Just another dead scamcoin, RIP

8
BAIP 2 was proven a failure due to BSIP76 twice intervening. SCAM

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: April 04, 2020, 04:11:22 pm »
interesting, why shall I trust you, not my eyes?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/us/politics/cia-coronavirus-china.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/china-concealed-extent-of-virus-outbreak-u-s-intelligence-says
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-52321529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CC6ChW-CQg
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/no-10-drops-china-from-coronavirus-death-toll-list-dxfr92fdk

They hit their threshold and set a fixed feed like bitCNY 🤔

we just updated the design of bitCNY, in old times bitCNY is a derivative that base on BTS real time price. now it is a derivative that base on one function of BTS price
Without providing bitasset holders a vote, without changing the asset details nor website's technical documentation to reflect these changes. A cover up.

Why not instead buy more BTS to cover bad debt positions than defraud bitasset holders?

surely this change hurt bitCNY holders, but it solve the death spiral and benefit BTS future. the decision is made mainly by China community, include most of the bitCNY holders.
No doubt it hurt bitasset holders, 70%+ loss of asset value is a substantial second bailout of bad debtors without their permission. bitCNY is no longer a stable store of value for savers nor retail, new smartcoins are being created with substantially higher credibility than bitassets.

Death spiral is subjective, the spiral has already occurred for the asset holder not the bad debtor; global settlement at real prices would have provided an opportunity for traders, denying this core trading activity disincentivizes buying BTS at these high prices.

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:27:25 pm »
In August 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to remove the dollar peg to gold, the Bretton Woods System collapsed.

You surely can say that US cheated the whole world, but the point is, at that moment US has no other choice.

BTS also face similar problem, BTS need first to survive, and then can seek more.

BitAssets are not created as a killer to BTS.
BS. Global settlement would have nullified this bad debt issue & we'd likely have recovered by this point.

BitAssets weren't created to defraud the bitshares community, yet here we are - the committee owned bitassets now permanently disgraced scamcoins.

Shame on you for fundamentally destroying the integrity of bitassets permanently.

On the upside, at least we know now that china's lying about their covid figures since these bitCNY fixed feeds are seemingly fully acceptable to the CCP. Had you not led the bitassets to defraud the entire Bitshares community I might have taken the CN Covid figures at face value and not prepared as well as I did for this quarantine. Cheers mate 👍

if you want to discuss bitCNY issue, let's focus on it, covid figures is another irrelevant problem.

and it's clear that China has solved internal problems and is now helping the whole world. as a Chinese that live in Shanghai I am clear what happened here.

BTW, where do you come from?

It's an identical problem - when faced with an unacceptable situation the outcome has been to repeatedly provide fake numbers.

Trust me when I say nobody believes China has solved the problem, they're simply lying about the figures, exactly like how BSIP76 proponents have behaved with bitCNY (provide fake numbers to escape an undesirable reality). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llgCCybOZoA

Why does my location matter? No courts are open; if I was in china would you be demanding my incarceration? Sad. I may or may not currently reside in the fully independent nation state of Taiwan.

11
Quote
Let's don't talk about the "scam"

That's what it is though, BSIP76 is a scam. BSIP76 proponents could fairly be categorized as "scammers".

12
OpenLedger / Re: OPEN.GRC DISABLED FOR 2 YEARS WITH NO JUSTIFICATION
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:59:27 am »
Did you open a support ticket?

What is your next step now?
Multiple, all closed.

My next step? Probably deal with the fact they're permanently inaccessible.

13
Can the elected spokesperson please mitigate the bitasset situation? Perhaps it's time to remove the 'bit' prefix to avoid users getting scammed?

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:26:19 am »
In August 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to remove the dollar peg to gold, the Bretton Woods System collapsed.

You surely can say that US cheated the whole world, but the point is, at that moment US has no other choice.

BTS also face similar problem, BTS need first to survive, and then can seek more.

BitAssets are not created as a killer to BTS.
BS. Global settlement would have nullified this bad debt issue & we'd likely have recovered by this point.

BitAssets weren't created to defraud the bitshares community, yet here we are - the committee owned bitassets now permanently disgraced scamcoins.

Shame on you for fundamentally destroying the integrity of bitassets permanently.

On the upside, at least we know now that china's lying about their covid figures since these bitCNY fixed feeds are seemingly fully acceptable to the CCP. Had you not led the bitassets to defraud the entire Bitshares community I might have taken the CN Covid figures at face value and not prepared as well as I did for this quarantine. Cheers mate 👍

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 30, 2020, 12:20:10 am »
I do not want to explain more to the guys who just say others do not understand this and that, it's wasting time.

The best thing that could happen to bitshares is for you personally to end up in concrete box with bars after an anonymous report to state security and exchange commission.   And all your friends and associates locked up and fined as well. 

Please somebody, do us all a favor, and report this asshole:

CHINA http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/csrc_en/about/contact/
USA https://www.sec.gov/tcr
EU https://www.esma.europa.eu/whistleblowers-corner

If you report to SEC you may be eligible for up to 10% of any money recovered as a reward!

Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

just report it yourself, don't you like the reward?

the decision is made by community through voting, not by myself.
So what you're saying is fetch all historic votes for price threshold WP & include them in the report as co-conspirators of this scam? You did orchestrate this scam so you're not off the hook just because others approved it - that's like saying the guy that ordered/planned/coordinated a hit didn't commit murder just because his gang voted on it, doesn't work like that buddy.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 54