Why does Bisq require a security deposit?

Security deposits create incentives for both buyer and seller to follow the rules of Bisq's trading protocol. They are locked into multisig escrow along with the bitcoin being traded, and are returned to each user when the trade completes successfully. If a trade goes to arbitration and one party is found to have violated Bisq's trading protocol, some or all of that party's security deposit may be awarded to their counterparty. Examples of protocol violations include a buyer failing to pay a seller, or a seller failing to acknowledge receipt of a buyer's payment. Most Bisq trades complete without any problem thanks in part to the incentives that security deposits create.

短期和最快的解决方案已经在这里提出，因为它不需要区块链更新（更改费用，用于创建比特资源的收取费用）。

我也同意激励创建BitAssets，但我认为从长远来看，它应该主要由用户驱动。因此，我可以在创建允许某种类型的股息的保证金头寸时考虑附加功能。

当用户创建保证金头寸时，他可以选择他的保证金比率。如果该比率高于某个比率，我们称之为激励抵押比率ICR，则可以看到其他功能：
用户可以锁定其时间范围X的位置，其中锁定意味着：

    该位置不能关闭
    bitAssets的借入量不能减少，只能增加
    职位抵押额不能减少到ICR以下，只能增加
    如果比率小于解锁激励抵押比率UICR（由委托人设置）

如果头寸锁定，那么BTS的抵押品收到储备池（或某个委托人账户，最终由费用填充）的Y％，该位置每月锁定，其中X％仅参照必要的BTS数量实现ICR。值Y取决于用户的选择X.

例如：ICR是3。

    用户打开位置以创建由50000 BTS支持的1000 bitUSD（假设10 BTS / bitUSD价格）。
    此位置的抵押比率为5，高于ICR，并且用户选择锁定一个月。
    Bitshares表示，现在他将获得每月支付0.1％的所有BTS以实现ICR。
    为了实现ICR，他只需要30000 BTS，所以激励是30000 * 0.1％= 30。
    每月从储备池中抽取30个BTS增加抵押品的头寸。两个月后，
    该位置自动解锁（但未关闭），用户现在有50060 BTS作为抵押品。


这种方法肯定需要在后台和前端进行开发，但对于hodlers来说可能非常有趣。

We are glad to introduce to you the new tokens NEO and GAS, that will be available for trading on our market as of today!

English please

The proposal that has already been adopted is to buy the BTS with a recycling fee and then buy it in the mortgage. The time to buy first, who is this? How much is the mortgage rate performed? What should I do if the funds after the mortgage collapse? This follow-up has a series of questions.
I come to a suggestion to collect the daily fee, buy the BTS through a random block, and (PS: why it is a random block to prevent someone from maliciously targeting the wool) to destroy it immediately!
Reasons: First of all, the current transaction fees generated by the internal disk transaction cannot form a large pool of funds within a short period of time to buy the BTS, and it needs long-term accumulation. However, once a large pool of funds is formed in the later period, the use of this fund will form the focus. Pile of troublesome things. The use of the destruction mechanism has long formed a deflationary trend in disguise, and the logic is simple. The effect is obvious. The community can take a lot of time to study how to expand the market and do technological research and development. It does not need to spend too much effort on this kind of thing. on.
Just to explore, to initiate, we can explore other deflation channels?