Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bench

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
1
General Discussion / Re: ANN: HONEST Market Pegged Assets
« on: June 23, 2021, 12:08:20 pm »
The MSSR on all HONEST.Assets gets reduced from 1.25 to 1.13.

Reducing the MSSR, gives almost 50% more space against future GS.

2
Honest Assets would be a better alternative to creating new assets.
Feel free to join our community channel, if you have not done so far:
https://t.me/onestcommunity

3
I don't think so.
For every liquidity pool, an asset need to be created, which is at least 965 BTS of fee (1/2 for non-LTMs due to initial fee pool, 1/10 for LTMs).
Ok, pool creation fees, does not include the asset creation fee, but is on top.

4
Liquidity pool fees:
create: 50 BTS
too cheap, 250-500BTS is fair

5
General Discussion / Re: 2020-10-04 EUR and RUBLE force-settment disabled
« on: October 06, 2020, 12:04:52 am »
Time will tell.
I also think it will increase the circulating supply, but it is not a long term solution for a healthy market. Higher FSO, could also allow bigger discount and higher arbitrage activity.

6
General Discussion / Re: 2020-10-04 EUR and RUBLE force-settment disabled
« on: October 04, 2020, 01:54:43 pm »
In order to build up more supply, it is now not possible to force-settle EUR or RUBLE.
To build more supply, more liquid BTS, more bitEUR holder and more arbitrage markets are needed. Removing the force settlement right, people are less likely to hold bitEUR.

7
I understand what you're saying.

On the other hand, if you do not want to take some dust, you do not take it.
But when I make an order, which is outside of the market center price, I become taker and I need to take all dust orders, before market gets liquidity.

8
Increased limit order taking fee to 0.9 BTS

This is too high, because not every order has 10k BTS. In reality we have markets with more and smaller orders. This means the taker needs always to pay the full taker fee for every dust order on the book.

0.3BTS should be the maximum here.
If the account is LTM the fee is 0.18.

Yes, but I don't think it is fair to charge 20x for a taker on every dust order. The fee structure makes sense for the pool, because the whole pool is traded.
10x increase against the maker order is enough here.

9
Increased limit order taking fee to 0.9 BTS

This is too high, because not every order has 10k BTS. In reality we have markets with more and smaller orders. This means the taker needs always to pay the full taker fee for every dust order on the book.

0.3BTS should be the maximum here.

10
General Discussion / Re: ANN: HONEST Market Pegged Assets
« on: September 04, 2020, 04:58:53 pm »
Recent HONEST-Updates:

- 5 independent price feeder
- MCR = 150, instead of 160

12
至于流动性计划,我想社区bench的流动性提案与现在uniswap基本也有一些相通之处,未必不是一个好方案。
yes, this is similar to Uniswap, but what is wrong with Uniswap?

Nothing wrong with Uniswap ;D

Good, I think it is relative simple and now you have also the option to take a long position, because you need only to stake one asset and not two, like in the old version.

13
至于流动性计划,我想社区bench的流动性提案与现在uniswap基本也有一些相通之处,未必不是一个好方案。
yes, this is similar to Uniswap, but what is wrong with Uniswap?

14
Quote
dear all,the yesterdays removal of votes from cnvote supporting openledger-dc witness makes it impossible to cover costs in near future of support of well known nodes like nuremberg and explorer bitsharescan.they will close as the month server fee expire unless its voted back

Why does Open Ledger not open source bitsharescan, when he is not able to cover the server costs ?

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] XBTSIO-WALLET
« on: July 24, 2020, 11:04:16 pm »
Bitshares-vision proxy supports XBTSIO-WALLET Witness.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23