Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bench

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22
1
Support!

2
Liquidity is a big problem on the BitShares DEX, because there is no way to lend assets for market making.

Bancor and Uniswap got recently a protocol update. More users are using their service for lending and asset swaps.

The Onest Blockchain is a proof of concept for BitShares and BTS holder, to bring new innovations into the space. Which means an OIP can be freely exchanged for a BSIP and vice versa.

Abstract
  • MLP2 is an asset lending feature, to provide liquidity for asset exchanges at the current price level
  • Simplified version of the Bancor Protocol without connector weight
  • Stepless liquidity with no order book for any asset pair
  • Blockchain as borrower and liquidity provider
  • ONS as central node and base currency
  • Market fees are shared to asset lender and blockchain

What is new in MLP2?
  • One asset deposit/withdraw to/from MLP2
  • Non-core token liquidity pairs
  • No orderbook integration

Flow Chart


Soruce:
https://github.com/Onest-io/OIPS/issues/2
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29651.0

3
HONEST.Assets are not an UIA, but a MPA, please correct.

4
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« on: June 07, 2020, 12:19:02 am »
Your proposal is not valid for a BAIP voting

This and the destruction BSIP has already a higher voting power:

5
General Discussion / Re: What happened to Telegram?
« on: June 06, 2020, 09:19:04 pm »
links to channels?

#btstalk:matrix.org
#agorise:matrix.org
#Onest:matrix.org

6
General Discussion / Re: What happened to Telegram?
« on: June 06, 2020, 09:07:42 pm »
We have created backup channels on the matrix network.

https://matrix.org/

7
General Discussion / Re: MARKET FEE SHARING AND BSIP 86
« on: June 06, 2020, 12:08:10 pm »
The implementation of BSIP86 is wrong, because it taxes the asset owner and involves the committee.

A better approach is this:
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/262

8
Do your own research, before posting any FUD.

Headline should be HONEST.Assets are the biggest opportunity, since the invention of bitAssets. 

One price feeder is atm offline, should be back in a few hours.

The rest got already answered by @chigbolu.


Compare this with bitAssets!

9
What are currently the most urgent updates bitshares UI need ?

I would say bug fixes, auto reconnect and UX refinements.

10
it's easy to call bitCNY and bitUSD scamcoin, it's difficult to make BTS grow up and resume bitCNY and bitUSD.

Yes, it is very easy to say:
- because borrower did not use the chance to pay their debt back, when bitUSD/bitCNY has a huge discount.
- because market fees where not used to finance the reserve pool or to support development.
- because my suggestion to lower feed price threshold every day by 0.5%, is still not implemented.
- because we have with HONEST.Assets a working alternative.

11
2.BTS/bitAssets group, Base Reward 3KBTS, Top Reward 20KBTS, and Buy-Sell Reward Ratio 10:0
Why should the network reward the borrower of a scam coin ? Something is here completely wrong.

12
The holders of bitasset? en, nobody care, let the holders of bitasset go to die!

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32035.0

13
thoughts?
Lowering price feed threshold every day by 0.5%. 

14
Which committee member voted for this increase ?

This is temporary until UI gets updated ?

There is a core problem, which does prevent the reuse of the asset for the prediction market ?

15
Support!
Marketing is everything guys, I think the community should focus more on how to promote bts out instead of operating behind closed doors

A good product is everything, or do you think the customer is stupid?
You want to market an unmaintained UI, broken MPAs (bitCNY, bitUSD), closed gateways or unfinished core ?

Everyone can do real marketing with our referral system!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22