Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fox

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23
271
To the authors: my comments are intended to be constructive, not inciteful.  Like you, I endeavor for an accurate and concise message detailing the Bitsares X solution.  Unfortunately, I do not feel qualified to draft content on this topic, rather will contribute by asking clarifying questions for your consideration.

 I am reading this piece as Patrick Bryne.  A majority of the content demonstrates the benefits of the Bitshares X platform as a solution to the crypto-share issuance question he presumably seeks.  I feel a disconnect exists in the body of knowledge presented to fully inform the reader of the complete solution. 

I am having a difficult time reconciling the demonstrated need for identity management in the crypto-share paper to the VOTE DAC content. 

272
A well written piece addressing the broad concepts at hand.  I feel a key component of the solution is glossed over and requires further definition prior to publication to enlighten the reader and close the knowledge gap:

Quote
Minimizing Counter Party Risk
The solution is really quite simple, an Identity Authority simply needs to sign the BitShares account...
...
Conclusion
Only BitShares X with the addition of certified accounts...

I am interested to read more about the solutions Bitshares X implements at this time to accommodate "certified accounts" from an "Identity Authority." 

Respectfully,
Fox

273
it's more of a social problem than technical. Just don't elect delegates that run multiple instances on the same machine.

I am interested to learn how one may evaluate the block generation and/or network propagation data to determine that multiple delegates are producing blocks from a distinct instance.

274
For the sake of decentralization and network propagation, I feel each delegate should run on a unique physical instance.  Yes, I fully understand the current Bitshares protocol does not enforce this. 

275
KeyID / Re: [ SNAPSHOT: 8/21 ] DNS
« on: August 03, 2014, 12:11:03 am »
I feel Keyhotee Founders should receive their .p2p in the genesis block.

276
This will likely cause you to sign 2 different blocks.
How you ensure that they will not sign 2 different blocks ?
Networking the master/slave pair nearest each other will mitigate risks due to propagation delays. However, I do not see an elegant fail safe way with a single master/slave pair to ensure delegate block production.  Introducing additional slaves for consensus building will likely add too much time before the block production window is breached and the next delegate produces on time. 

277
Usage:
wallet_delegate_set_slave <delegate> <master_node> <delay> <enable>

Enable or disable block production for delegate following delayed block production on master node

Parameters:
  delegate (string, required): The delegate name to slave for (may use ALL for multiple delegates)
  master_node (string, required): The IP and port number of the master delegate node.  (Format IP:PORT)
  delay (int, optional) {0-10} : The delay in seconds the slave will wait for receipt of block production from master (default 5)
  enabled (bool, optional): true to enable block production, else false (default: true)

Returns:
  void

278
Directing a portion of my delegate pay to happypatty for the effort put forth on delegate statistics.

Thank you.

279
I'm doing this entirely as a hobby and a pet project at the moment.

Completely respect this statement.  :)

Are you willing to share you data dictionary describing the information you are currently collecting? 

Respectfully,
Fox

280
I'll do much more over the weekend.

Very much looking forward to your progress.  How may interested parties connect with your efforts?  Are you providing your code for peer review at this time?  Are you willing to share a small subset of your collected data  (perhaps a few rounds)? 

Thanks,
Fox

281
Here to whet your appetite are just some network health stats:
This data visualization is much needed.  Thank you.

Change request: I believe the rounds are 101 blocks each (rather than 100). 

282
General Discussion / Re: Hey, BTSX delegates, come here.
« on: July 23, 2014, 09:01:39 pm »
FYI - I still support you FOX... I am just approving more than 101 delegates right now so people have a chance to prove what they can do.  The wallet is selecting who gets in at random.

Appreciate the vote of confidence. 

Also, I fully support your efforts to distribute the block production among as many unique nodes as possible. 

283
General Discussion / Re: Hey, BTSX delegates, come here.
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:28:15 pm »
Looking to the community to continue their support my highly reliable delegate. 

Code: [Select]
ID    NAME (* next in line)           APPROVAL       PRODUCED MISSED   RELIABILITY   PAY RATE PAY BALANCE         LAST BLOCK
============================================================================================================================
169   fox                             4.0933895679 % 184      3        98.40 %       100 %    412.46580 BTSX      38461

Thanks in advance!

284
General Discussion / Re: Delegate temporary absence
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:23:32 pm »
I actually have that planned for my bitshares_delegate_tools (https://github.com/wackou/bitshares_delegate_tools)

This looks like a great start.  I'll offer my support to your efforts. 

285
General Discussion / Re: Delegate temporary absence
« on: July 23, 2014, 12:33:10 pm »
The most important role the delegate serves is the timely and accurate production of blocks. 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23