Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ElMato

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20
91
Technical Support / Re: Blinded Transactions
« on: September 29, 2015, 12:59:23 am »
@clout, this is what worked for me.

1) Create blind account "bacc1"
2) Create blind account "bacc2"

get_blind_accounts
[[
    "bacc1",
    "GPH7EsV61saKFYh5kQwxTtd7h92BtJP51YL32EEsMeUWhZjkY4NVv"
  ],[
    "bacc2",
    "GPH824HUDikZtpP8U26aGWNddGrBCcJSFQkQ41HRSqjCZFhZJfTCA"
  ]
]

3)  transfer_to_blind nathan CORE [["GPH7EsV61saKFYh5kQwxTtd7h92BtJP51YL32EEsMeUWhZjkY4NVv", 555]] true

4) get_blind_balances bacc1
555 CORE

5) blind_transfer bacc1 GPH824HUDikZtpP8U26aGWNddGrBCcJSFQkQ41HRSqjCZFhZJfTCA 45 CORE true

6) get_blind_balances bacc2
45 CORE

7) get_blind_balances bacc1
495 CORE

[15 CORE fee!]

92
General Discussion / Re: BitShares' Political Defense
« on: September 28, 2015, 06:09:05 am »
Quote
3. Keep as much distance as possible from existing political regimes as long as functionally possible.
http://www.cato.org/publications/white-paper/why-silicon-valley-should-not-normalize-relations-washington-dc


I don't really agree. I think you need as many allies as you can get in as many governments as you can reach. Power is power, whether it's in government, church, corporate, or clan.

Do you want to be ideologically pure and lose because your competitor made some alliance to give themselves an unfair advantage over your business? If what you are doing is important enough to the world then losing might not be an option.

+5%

93
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Telegram Group Chat
« on: September 27, 2015, 05:05:22 pm »
@ElMato

94
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Telegram-Group
« on: September 27, 2015, 05:16:24 am »
I can't chat neither

95
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Telegram-Group
« on: September 26, 2015, 08:23:59 pm »
I'm in

96
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 24, 2015, 08:30:56 pm »
elmato updated

97
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 23, 2015, 03:25:30 pm »
I have my witness node running.
Need some votes.

elmato

98
I think we can vote for "void workers" that put their salary back to the pool (i dont have a link to that nice flow-graph) but i don't know if that BTS pool can also work to help in the rescue.

I don't think that we can vote (at least for the moment) to increase the supply, maybe with a hard fork in the future.

But anyway that will happen after the market (bitUSD) is defunct.

If we want to take the loose we need (speaking without much knowledge) a way to gradually re-collateralize the debts that are undercollateralized first accelerating the drain of the BTS pool and if we are short printing more BTS ... (does it make any sense?)



99
General Discussion / Can we copy MakerDao blackswan mitigation techniques?
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:47:58 pm »
--disclaimer: not an expert talking--

I think we will have a robust system when 2.0 is out and running.

- Clear and defined governance model
- Ability to (de)centralize at will
- Aligned economic incentives
- A good degree of privacy

Among other excellents features such as smartcoins, transaction speed, scalability, copay-on-protocol, etc, etc, etc.

Looking at MakerDao, one of the things that sounds interesting is the actions their planned to mitigate the effects of a blackswan.

I know that "printing" more BTS is a sensible subject in the community, but i think in an scenario like this.

Supose that 2 years have passed from now and the marketcap of bitUSD is 100M USD, basically a lot of people is using it as a medium of exchange etc etc. Suddenly a black swan event ocurrs, the rainy-day pool is not enough to cover all, and we declare the bitUSD market dead and everyone gets their bitUSD swaped by (what is left) BTS.

Bad publicity and difficult to restart confidence in the sysmtem again.

Should we as stake holders take the losse on it in order to keep the business running?

100
 +5% +5% +5%
Excellent news!
Congratulations to all the dev team.

101
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] LimeWallet - Beta
« on: August 27, 2015, 04:55:13 am »
Deposit / Withdraw using bitcoin is down for the moment.

102
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] LimeWallet - Beta
« on: August 26, 2015, 01:32:36 am »

103
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] LimeWallet - Beta
« on: August 26, 2015, 01:30:05 am »
iOS Version
iOS version is ready to test, please PM you email to add you to testflight!

104
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] LimeWallet - Beta
« on: August 21, 2015, 04:22:28 am »
Just a general question I have, and if this has already been answered I apologize, is lime wallet also using CCEDK as another avenue for a source of liquidity?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No at the moment.
We need to take a closer look at the API to see how the "Instant Orders" works since it seems that even if there is no liquidity in the "exchange" it quotes buy/sell up to 100 BTC (for the BTC/USD pair).

105
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] LimeWallet - Beta
« on: August 21, 2015, 12:40:10 am »
Great work , and is there Chinese version?

Chinese localization is on the TODO (top prio)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20