Quote from: bytemaster on April 23, 2015, 05:20:40 PM
We are implementing the "implement then announce" rather than the "announce and then implement" approach to avoid missing deadlines and killing buzz or confusing the market.   When we announce the roadmap will be included... but it will only have 1 item on it and that is turing complete smart contracts which will be our LAST hard fork.

Good plan. :)

Quote from: bytemaster on April 23, 2015, 05:20:40 PM

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on April 23, 2015, 09:22:00 AM
- how long are your monday meetings?
- what can possible be more important than non-classified talk? ( :P )
- how is the bitasset3.0 proposal implemented in parallel to bitassets1.0?
- will it be the "same" market/asset just an extra set of features? or will it be a different token?
- will bitassets3.0 be a 1.0 feature?
- when will we have a rough roadmap that can be put on the webpage?

Monday meetings are from 10 am through lunch. 
We will share those plans with you once we get everything ready for public consumption (this summer)
BitUSD 3.0 will be different than BitUSD
1.0 has been postponed due to BitAssets 3.0...
We will have a documented, tested, stable protocol definition this summer that will not need to change that includes the referral system

We are implementing the "implement then announce" rather than the "announce and then implement" approach to avoid missing deadlines and killing buzz or confusing the market.   When we announce the roadmap will be included... but it will only have 1 item on it and that is turing complete smart contracts which will be our LAST hard fork.

will the basic performance still be improved before 1.0 ?

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on April 23, 2015, 09:22:00 AM
- how long are your monday meetings?
- what can possible be more important than non-classified talk? ( :P )
- how is the bitasset3.0 proposal implemented in parallel to bitassets1.0?
- will it be the "same" market/asset just an extra set of features? or will it be a different token?
- will bitassets3.0 be a 1.0 feature?
- when will we have a rough roadmap that can be put on the webpage?

Monday meetings are from 10 am through lunch. 
We will share those plans with you once we get everything ready for public consumption (this summer)
BitUSD 3.0 will be different than BitUSD
1.0 has been postponed due to BitAssets 3.0...
We will have a documented, tested, stable protocol definition this summer that will not need to change that includes the referral system

We are implementing the "implement then announce" rather than the "announce and then implement" approach to avoid missing deadlines and killing buzz or confusing the market.   When we announce the roadmap will be included... but it will only have 1 item on it and that is turing complete smart contracts which will be our LAST hard fork. 

Quote from: Carpet Ride on April 23, 2015, 04:48:52 PM
Have any BitShares devs played with the Ethereum code base?  What were their takeaways relative to BitShares?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have looked through their VM code and can tell you with certainty that their architecture is very heavy and will suffer from many issues we have identified and resolved in our designs.    Performance is going to be critical going forward.  I am more concerned about Ripple/Stellar than ETH.

Have any BitShares devs played with the Ethereum code base?  What were their takeaways relative to BitShares?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Being upfront when I'm saying I'm not against privatized bitassets.  However  it does seem like if we go in this direction this means Delegate Bitusd and Bitgold..etc will go away.  And this is an area of concern as our our core competency/ advantage will go with it.  Now it becomes something that can be easily reproducible and stolen by other competitors.   Rune himself is building on the pyethereum code base and remarks how fast and easy it is to do. If he, with just an IT background can do this on ethereum, what's to say all the sophisticated features of Bitshares won't also be developed on Ethereum by just causally invested coders. 

And why are you optimistic about the prospects of Bitshares succeeding over other products, when privatized Bitasset feeds can and will likely be copied?  Why do you think Bitshares will have an advantage over Ethereum?  How does Bitshares protect its goodwill?

- how long are your monday meetings?
- what can possible be more important than non-classified talk? ( :P )
- how is the bitasset3.0 proposal implemented in parallel to bitassets1.0?
- will it be the "same" market/asset just an extra set of features? or will it be a different token?
- will bitassets3.0 be a 1.0 feature?
- when will we have a rough roadmap that can be put on the webpage?