Quote from: tonyk2 on April 29, 2015, 10:18:57 AM

-Is there a plan to have  something...like stable client before dreaming about bitAssets 3.0?

related:

- Do we care if shorts are paying 10% premium and it was never in the rules. If this is indeed a bug shouldn't we fix it in less than 2 mo.?

- Acquisition of new costumers are quite high right? Should we not take care of the biggest BTS bulls by at least not making them loose more money than what they subscribed to due to bugs? If 'yes'  why did you let the bugs persist for 2+ months?

+5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%


are you shorting bitASSETS now? If not,why(?) and  when will you do it ?

have you more or less BTS compared to 5 months earlier? (same question for your bitASSETs)

Can you prove to the community how much BTS you have? (maybe voting for a temporary delegate for that reason....)

when will bitassets3.0 be ready?

any hope to let shorters cover with existing collateral ? and when will it be possible? (since liquidity is to low right now for bitASSETS )

-Is there a plan to have  something...like stable client before dreaming about bitAssets 3.0?

related:

- Do we care if shorts are paying 10% premium and it was never in the rules. If this is indeed a bug shouldn't we fix it in less than 2 mo.?

- Acquisition of new costumers are quite high right? Should we not take care of the biggest BTS bulls by at least not making them loose more money than what they subscribed to due to bugs? If 'yes'  why did you let the bugs persist for 2+ months?

Is there any plan to implement atomic cross chain trading features into the client?

Are there plans to improve privacy so that registered nicknames are not required for each transaction?

Is there a path to diluting BTS? Can dilution be made impossible?

Quote from: kenCode on April 29, 2015, 09:54:48 AM
Stan, I'd love to chat with you in the next mumble if you can sit in.
Someone mentioned titles and I totally agree. I think the community would benefit greatly if we didn't always have the same people "reporting" on the status of this or that. It puts that one person into such a position that it makes them a target and just recreates a hierarchical vision of the "company". -if that makes any sense :o

Is there an alternative?

Stan, I'd love to chat with you in the next mumble if you can sit in.
Someone mentioned titles and I totally agree. I think the community would benefit greatly if we didn't always have the same people "reporting" on the status of this or that. It puts that one person into such a position that it makes them a target and just recreates a hierarchical vision of the "company". -if that makes any sense :o

What does the Bytemaster think about the idea of tying vesting rate to market cap? This wouldn't change the overall supply of shares, just move them in time to when the market can better deal with dilution. It'd also dampen price swings.

Quote from: BitcoinJesus2.O on April 28, 2015, 11:35:19 AM
What will the new minimum amount of collateral required to short pegged BitAssets be under the new system?

Dynamic, "delegates" can change it at any time with 2 weeks notice and shareholder approval.  The change would only impact *new* short positions, old positions wouldn't be required to up their collateral unless they do a partial cover.