Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on May 21, 2015, 05:56:05 AM

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 20, 2015, 09:45:22 PM
right, that's like only 1.99999% of existing code!!! i've read high exaggerations of 2% in other threads. and don't forget, the bitshares messenger (wasn't that called Keyhotee at first?) said we weren't aware that this project died months ago. speaking of that, i really need to go register bitghost instead of hanging around this forum where they do nothing but look forward... so much so that they didn't even notice this is a dead project walking!

You do realize that parts of the code have been written by 3rd party developers like websocketspp, miniupnpc and other libraries?
Did you take the 'fc' library, the 'qt_wallet' and the 'web_wallet' into your considerations?

I'm joking x, poking fun at another thread that cried "only 2%!".

Quote from: mirrax on May 21, 2015, 01:54:49 PM
What does +5% refer to?
I can see it all over the place...
Sorry for noob question  +5%

Initially .. like two yrs ago .. we used +5% as a meme of having interest on-the-blockchain ..
The particular 5% has been dismissed quite quickly as we realized it's unrealistic to have a fixed interest .. but the meme stayed :)

What does +5% refer to?
I can see it all over the place...
Sorry for noob question  +5%

Quote from: mirrax on May 21, 2015, 10:37:16 AM
Quality is more important than Qtty.

+5% +5% +5%
...and you guys know exactly the 10 things that I want to see in the next version (whether the BitShares DAC uses them or not, my clients WILL use them).

A successful company employs Workers who are driven, accountable and rewarded.

Quality is more important than Qtty.

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 20, 2015, 09:45:22 PM
right, that's like only 1.99999% of existing code!!! i've read high exaggerations of 2% in other threads. and don't forget, the bitshares messenger (wasn't that called Keyhotee at first?) said we weren't aware that this project died months ago. speaking of that, i really need to go register bitghost instead of hanging around this forum where they do nothing but look forward... so much so that they didn't even notice this is a dead project walking!

You do realize that parts of the code have been written by 3rd party developers like websocketspp, miniupnpc and other libraries?
Did you take the 'fc' library, the 'qt_wallet' and the 'web_wallet' into your considerations?

Quote from: jabbajabba ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ on May 20, 2015, 09:27:22 PM
i bet it is something like 16998 lines  :P pathetic

right, that's like only 1.99999% of existing code!!! i've read high exaggerations of 2% in other threads. and don't forget, the bitshares messenger (wasn't that called Keyhotee at first?) said we weren't aware that this project died months ago. speaking of that, i really need to go register bitghost instead of hanging around this forum where they do nothing but look forward... so much so that they didn't even notice this is a dead project walking!



Man, this is worse than the Pepe market crash of 2015, countries were hurt!

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 20, 2015, 09:21:50 PM

Quote from: bytemaster on May 15, 2015, 01:13:51 PM
We have added over 17,000 lines of code.

:P

17k probably isnt even true

i bet it is something like 16998 lines  :P pathetic

Quote from: bytemaster on May 15, 2015, 01:13:51 PM
We have added over 17,000 lines of code.

:P

Quote from: fuzzy on May 20, 2015, 05:05:00 AM

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on May 19, 2015, 07:51:19 PM
Headless = nonGUI

Thanks xeroc.

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 19, 2015, 09:08:30 PM
When do we individually get to hangout with bytemaster and record the session for everyone else to hear later???

Dan, fair warning, when my time comes for a 1on1 hangout, we're (legally) smoking a fatty and then you're just going to talk for a full hour afterwards without interruption (other than the occassional, "whooooaaaa, duuuuude", from me in the background).

I expect nothing less than mind-blowing brilliance from our 'hangout'.


On a serious note, some of the questions asked in this thread were answered/addressed in the previous two sessions from what I remember (see above).
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-15-2015/
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-8-2015/

Lol...hilarious post.

Ha ha, loved it! I would love an interview of BM like that so he could really cut loose.....no consequences, no questions just the occasional 'no way man' as he trips us out with his vision

Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ on May 19, 2015, 07:51:19 PM
Headless = nonGUI

Thanks xeroc.

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 19, 2015, 09:08:30 PM
When do we individually get to hangout with bytemaster and record the session for everyone else to hear later???

Dan, fair warning, when my time comes for a 1on1 hangout, we're (legally) smoking a fatty and then you're just going to talk for a full hour afterwards without interruption (other than the occassional, "whooooaaaa, duuuuude", from me in the background).

I expect nothing less than mind-blowing brilliance from our 'hangout'.


On a serious note, some of the questions asked in this thread were answered/addressed in the previous two sessions from what I remember (see above).
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-15-2015/
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-8-2015/

Lol...hilarious post.

When do we individually get to hangout with bytemaster and record the session for everyone else to hear later???

Dan, fair warning, when my time comes for a 1on1 hangout, we're (legally) smoking a fatty and then you're just going to talk for a full hour afterwards without interruption (other than the occassional, "whooooaaaa, duuuuude", from me in the background).

I expect nothing less than mind-blowing brilliance from our 'hangout'.


On a serious note, some of the questions asked in this thread were answered/addressed in the previous two sessions from what I remember (see above).
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-15-2015/
https://beyondbitcoin.org/developer-hangout-with-bytemaster-may-8-2015/

Headless = nonGUI

Quote from: sittingduck on May 18, 2015, 11:44:31 AM

Quote from: brainbug on May 18, 2015, 06:43:42 AM
I have a quick question regarding client and GUI:

I saw (https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases) that only for Linux there are separated programs, i.e., client (daemon?) and GUI. Why is this not the case for MacOS and Windows? I would love to run a "headless" client on Windows - given that the official GUI is still a bit buggy.

That way, people could start writing GUIs independently, or start integrating Bitshares into their applications. I'd love to see that possibility. Any chances on this on systems other than Linux any soon?

You can run headless on any platform.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

what do you mean by "run headless"?