arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0e - PTS GPU miner- STABLE - GTX 780 - 2100 CPM

Started by archit, January 10, 2014, 07:37:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

emski

1.0d has degraded performance compared to 1.0c on GTX780.
1.0c had around 1700 cpm, 1.0d has around 1300 cpm.
Tried both on GTX 780 + i7 3770K and on GTX 570 + GTX780 + AMD A6 5400.
In both cases performance degradation seems identical.
arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe doesnt run on GTX 570 + GTX780 + AMD A6 5400.

PS: missing cudart64_55.dll in the archive for 1.0d
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

archit

#172
New update with speed upgrade, capability to work on devices with compute 1.1 or greater and low memory version coming soon!

Edit: New update released, upto 20% speed gains on all devices and additional 10 to 15% on cm 3.5 devices

zvs

Quote from: paul on January 18, 2014, 11:55:15 AM
Hello

The ratio GPU clock / Memory clock is it important?

i think it may be better to underclock memory some to raise core higher.   if it's a temp/voltage issue

otherwise  yeah just raise them both
Pls to join [url=https://primedice.com/?ref=Zvs]Primedice 3[/url] and frolic about merrily whilst gambling awe-inspiring quantities of bitcoins. The power of [url=http://nogleg.com/exorcism.jpg]Christ[/url] compels you.

I have a dogecoin p2pool at [url=http://nogleg.com:9555]Nogleg[/url].

archit


Gwynbleidd

Not for everyone... but very good too.

I want next cpm boost.

archit

Quote from: paul on January 19, 2014, 09:54:06 AM
arCUDAminer1.0c is the best  :D
Thank you archit

GTX690 = 2150 c/m


GTS450 = 253 c/m


Quadro 2000 = 204 c/m


Glad to know, please post your results in the comparison thread

paul

arCUDAminer1.0c is the best  :D
Thank you archit

GTX690 = 2150 c/m


GTS450 = 253 c/m


Quadro 2000 = 204 c/m

Gwynbleidd

Nope. Faster VRAM => more cpm. Faster GPU => a bit more cpm.

paul

Hello

The ratio GPU clock / Memory clock is it important?

archit

Quote from: electrocat on January 17, 2014, 04:11:16 PM
Quote from: archit on January 17, 2014, 11:38:45 AM
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)

Can you do a similar update to your openCL miner to not require AVX or SSE4?

Coming soon!

electrocat

Quote from: archit on January 17, 2014, 11:38:45 AM
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)

Can you do a similar update to your openCL miner to not require AVX or SSE4?
PTS: Ph8QzEozjW5GhuAvE6oaGfDsJKNDndQCZh

Gwynbleidd

910-920 cpm on 680 gtx, cm3 high perf with avx. Nice, but with another miner have 999-1005.

nod

only for ypool?
beeeeer/PTSpool/1Gh can't connect...

archit

#160
New update! Runs on processors without AVX or SSE4! Huge performance boost on some cards (One of the testers reported 650 c/m in 1.0b to 840 c/m)

archit

Quote from: sgtstedanko on January 17, 2014, 09:50:53 AM
Works on the built in Intel HD 4000 but crashes on a gtx 550 ti


Problem signature:
  Problem Event Name:   BEX64
  Application Name:   arOpenCLminer.exe
  Application Version:   0.0.0.0
  Application Timestamp:   52d41b79
  Fault Module Name:   StackHash_1dc2
  Fault Module Version:   0.0.0.0
  Fault Module Timestamp:   00000000
  Exception Offset:   0000000000000000
  Exception Code:   c0000005
  Exception Data:   0000000000000008
  OS Version:   6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
  Locale ID:   1033
  Additional Information 1:   1dc2
  Additional Information 2:   1dc22fb1de37d348f27e54dbb5278e7d
  Additional Information 3:   cbc5
  Additional Information 4:   cbc5ec6970b2af35927ad67117ca57e2

Use the CUDA miner not opencl for Nvidia