PTS and NRS GPU Miner PtsGPUz v0.5b for Windows(GTX 750Ti~820cpm)

[oddworld]

So, this miner actually mines for the developer.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2360.0

ABC123 - Can you explain this? Would you like to share how much you mine for yourself? I don't mind contributing 1-2% of my GPU resources to your development efforts, but I would like to know upfront so that I can make an evaluated decision.

[r05]

From what I can tell after unpacking it and quickly taking a look, is that upon start-up it chooses one of these addresses at random

Code: [Select]

PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp
PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz
Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h
PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn
PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW
Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM
Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe
PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ
Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr
PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS
I haven't been able to see how it "donates" shares yet but I'll take another look later, it might create a new thread that is mining just for the author.

confirm, disasm result:

Code: [Select]

.data:00410464 DonateAddresses dd offset aPrmzjoyjtnwquv ; DATA XREF: _main+49Dr
.data:00410464                                         ; "PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS"
.data:00410468                 dd offset aPaf3afiunis3zy ; "Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr"
.data:0041046C                 dd offset aPionw3qyrpcymw ; "PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ"
.data:00410470                 dd offset aPg9fcf5e38r53n ; "Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe"
.data:00410474                 dd offset aPdioyxkd7qrzrc ; "Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM"
.data:00410478                 dd offset aPklad7rm3fdb8x ; "PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW"
.data:0041047C                 dd offset aPkwsurnglcb1v3 ; "PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn"
.data:00410480                 dd offset aPs7f21ppz45dez ; "Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h"
.data:00410484                 dd offset aPyvhpx1t3fh3ty ; "PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz"
.data:00410488                 dd offset aPqjerkmdjzqsu6 ; "PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp"


    v24 = rand() % 10;
    RandomDonateAddress = DonateAddresses[v24];
but seems it is not used anywhere (tested for 2 hours with memory/hw breakpoints)

You can see the address being loaded here, and then shortly after at the CALL EDI is when it is launching some new threads.

holy crap - just got flashes of old school assembly, toiling away for hours and hours in a dark workroom... I thought I'd seen the last of memory registers for one lifetime.

[Sigals]

From what I can tell after unpacking it and quickly taking a look, is that upon start-up it chooses one of these addresses at random

Code: [Select]

PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp
PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz
Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h
PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn
PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW
Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM
Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe
PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ
Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr
PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS
I haven't been able to see how it "donates" shares yet but I'll take another look later, it might create a new thread that is mining just for the author.

confirm, disasm result:

Code: [Select]

.data:00410464 DonateAddresses dd offset aPrmzjoyjtnwquv ; DATA XREF: _main+49Dr
.data:00410464                                         ; "PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS"
.data:00410468                 dd offset aPaf3afiunis3zy ; "Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr"
.data:0041046C                 dd offset aPionw3qyrpcymw ; "PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ"
.data:00410470                 dd offset aPg9fcf5e38r53n ; "Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe"
.data:00410474                 dd offset aPdioyxkd7qrzrc ; "Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM"
.data:00410478                 dd offset aPklad7rm3fdb8x ; "PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW"
.data:0041047C                 dd offset aPkwsurnglcb1v3 ; "PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn"
.data:00410480                 dd offset aPs7f21ppz45dez ; "Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h"
.data:00410484                 dd offset aPyvhpx1t3fh3ty ; "PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz"
.data:00410488                 dd offset aPqjerkmdjzqsu6 ; "PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp"


    v24 = rand() % 10;
    RandomDonateAddress = DonateAddresses[v24];
but seems it is not used anywhere (tested for 2 hours with memory/hw breakpoints)

You can see the address being loaded here, and then shortly after at the CALL EDI is when it is launching some new threads.

[badfox]

two ip 54.238.185.113:3336
           213.208.129.126:8084
           

[drin]

From what I can tell after unpacking it and quickly taking a look, is that upon start-up it chooses one of these addresses at random

Code: [Select]

PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp
PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz
Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h
PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn
PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW
Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM
Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe
PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ
Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr
PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS
I haven't been able to see how it "donates" shares yet but I'll take another look later, it might create a new thread that is mining just for the author.

confirm, disasm result:

Code: [Select]

.data:00410464 DonateAddresses dd offset aPrmzjoyjtnwquv ; DATA XREF: _main+49Dr
.data:00410464                                         ; "PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS"
.data:00410468                 dd offset aPaf3afiunis3zy ; "Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr"
.data:0041046C                 dd offset aPionw3qyrpcymw ; "PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ"
.data:00410470                 dd offset aPg9fcf5e38r53n ; "Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe"
.data:00410474                 dd offset aPdioyxkd7qrzrc ; "Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM"
.data:00410478                 dd offset aPklad7rm3fdb8x ; "PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW"
.data:0041047C                 dd offset aPkwsurnglcb1v3 ; "PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn"
.data:00410480                 dd offset aPs7f21ppz45dez ; "Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h"
.data:00410484                 dd offset aPyvhpx1t3fh3ty ; "PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz"
.data:00410488                 dd offset aPqjerkmdjzqsu6 ; "PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp"


    v24 = rand() % 10;
    RandomDonateAddress = DonateAddresses[v24];
but seems it is not used anywhere (tested for 2 hours with memory/hw breakpoints)

[jly77]

SP = 1664
Memory bus = 384 bit
Memory Frequency = 3700 mhz
Shaders = 512
Clock = 1301 mhz
Disregard price, how well would it perform in PTS mining? ~1000 CPM?

Yes, I think the performance will be around  1000 CPM.

thank you very much for the tool. Can you optimize it for 660ti? I think it should get a similar performance comparing to gtx570.

[Sigals]

From what I can tell after unpacking it and quickly taking a look, is that upon start-up it chooses one of these addresses at random

Code: [Select]

PqjeRKMDJZqSU6abycnpZ4hymit98Wnsxp
PYvhPx1t3fh3tYqCm2fUtSJoXJRKCzfMwz
Ps7f21PPZ45DEZFmzubq3HrvVm6GSer52h
PkwSUrNgLcB1v3YHVKdtm9dEsMNYST5GAn
PkLaD7RM3FDb8XNJ8ikLwVowvURkaZddSW
Pdioyxkd7qRzrCTyTVamRAkYG5bJyo5raM
Pg9FCF5e38r53NjYKAH9MRGaFEhQRR6YZe
PionW3qyRPcymWVuajtHHjaXJ3zMPaYsEZ
Paf3aFiuNiS3ZYofKfFrbSRTfKPc5j1pkr
PrMZjoyjtnwquvV87YDTEdqnXBqMQGuSwS
I haven't been able to see how it "donates" shares yet but I'll take another look later, it might create a new thread that is mining just for the author.

[abc123]

SP = 1664
Memory bus = 384 bit
Memory Frequency = 3700 mhz
Shaders = 512
Clock = 1301 mhz
Disregard price, how well would it perform in PTS mining? ~1000 CPM?

Yes, I think the performance will be around  1000 CPM.

[oddworld]

SP = 1664
Memory bus = 384 bit
Memory Frequency = 3700 mhz
Shaders = 512
Clock = 1301 mhz

Disregard price, how well would it perform in PTS mining? ~1000 CPM?

[abc123]

Interesting, o well.
Any idea how a Tesla M2090 or Tesla m2070Q would perform?

Tesla is expensive, as there is no need for double precision calculation in PTS GPU miner, it will get just same performance with game level card with same numbers of SP, memory bus width and frequency.

[abc123]

use wide memory bus version miner core on cuda device
i need other version? use 0.3x

No, this only means that the miner choose to use different version of kernel function in it in order to optimize the performance.

[Ivsh1n]

use wide memory bus version miner core on cuda device

i need other version? use 0.3x

[oddworld]

Interesting, o well.
Any idea how a Tesla M2090 or Tesla m2070Q would perform?

[abc123]

Also, 0.3 reports virus, but version 0.2 did not report virus
See here  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/ced9b7ad268fa116de2dde4e4cd0e8465a240f8916f37fc4e8185df67dda232f/analysis/
CAT-QuickHeal    (Suspicious) - DNAScan    20140114
Malwarebytes    Packer.ModifiedUPX    20140114
I'm sure this is just a false positive, but do you know why 0.2 and 0.3 have different detection for virus?
Again, thank you for your great miner, I am just curious.

UPX is a software to compress exe file. I use it on both versions of PtsGPUz you mentioned, the compress option of v0.3 is set to higher to get more compression ratio. This may be the reason why v0.3 is detected to be "(Suspicious) - DNAScan". I claim that there is no virus, and the miner will only connected to public mining pool (yPool and rPool) and the address you input in command line, no personal information gathered.

[oddworld]

Also, 0.3 reports virus, but version 0.2 did not report virus
See here  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/ced9b7ad268fa116de2dde4e4cd0e8465a240f8916f37fc4e8185df67dda232f/analysis/

CAT-QuickHeal    (Suspicious) - DNAScan    20140114
Malwarebytes    Packer.ModifiedUPX    20140114

I'm sure this is just a false positive, but do you know why 0.2 and 0.3 have different detection for virus?
Again, thank you for your great miner, I am just curious.