arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0e - PTS GPU miner- STABLE - GTX 780 - 2100 CPM

[archit]

I have two the same type of card. Will crossfire in a future version add any efficiencies?

Also, are there any performance improvements between version d and version e?

Revert a change that some people reported to cause slow downs so yet, performance improvements in e over d

[KhabsCat]

I have two the same type of card. Will crossfire in a future version add any efficiencies?

Also, are there any performance improvements between version d and version e?

[archit]

Please create <1GB version with Compute 3.5. There are GT630 and GT640 that are Kepler based.

There is a normal compute 3.5 binary too. Also those having problems with cpm drop in cm35_highperf please try the normal cm35 so I can get this sorted out

[wsnnwa]

I ran arCUDAminer 1.0d for ~45 minutes and my c/m settled right below 1600. I ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe



I also ran arCUDAminer 1.0e for 20 minutes, same results. I also ran arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf.exe



Normal arCUDAminer.exe on 1.0e gives me the best result from your miner, ~1800 c/m.

[wsnnwa]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.

Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.



Below is the other miner.




Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.

Give it at least 45 minutes to stabilize

I will do that, but my system traditionally stabilizes within a couple minutes.

I will post my results later tonight.

[archit]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.

Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.



Below is the other miner.




Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.

Give it at least 45 minutes to stabilize

[Instigater]

Please create <1GB version with Compute 3.5. There are GT630 and GT640 that are Kepler based.

[emski]

GTX 780 + i7 3770K
arCUDAminer_highperf - 1.0e performance ~ 1750                 1.0c performance ~ 1700
arCUDAminer_cm35_highperf - 1.0e performance ~1350        1.0c performance ~1650

There are some performance fluctuations and my methods of getting results are not very reliable (running the executable for about 2 minutes and looking at the last few cpm reports). However the difference in performance of CM35_highperf is clearly noticable.

[wsnnwa]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

~1500 c/m on 1.0d compared to ~2100 c/m on that other miner.

Below is your arCUDAMiner1d.



Below is the other miner.




Edit: Actually your 1.0c gives me more c/m than 1.0d, 1.0c provides ~1700 c/m. Screenshot below containing 1.0c.

[archit]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

What does 1.0d give?

[wsnnwa]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

This miner, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2378.0.

[archit]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.

Which miner are we talking about?

[archit]

Thanks for the response it seems I rushed the testing a bit, will revert the change I think is causing this

Edit:Rolled back the change, devices with compute 3.5 still have a speed improvement.

Please test v1.0e if you still want cm3 back no problem

[Daniel]

Excuse me, I'd like to get the cm3 version back and try it on my GTX660. Thanks a lot.

[wsnnwa]

I have been testing different miners and different pools over the last couple days, as with the poster above I also saw a decrease of ~250 c/m with my GTX 780. I went from ~1730 to ~1400.

There is a different miner that gives me ~2100 c/m but it only runs on be^5r, so 'ill be looking around until I find a suitable one with either 1gh or ypool.