About the collusion in poker game. I'm sure some friends can play a couple of tables and give them info on their cards. That would allow them to have a slight advantage because they can estimate better the odds in the game. I don't think it's a big deal.
I've been playing professionally for years, I usually play around 12 tables in mid-high stakes. I would win more by tables if I could collude with someone but I couldn't do that playing my 12+ tables. It's way more profitable to play 1 more table than lose your time trying to collude with someone.
I'm pretty sure if someone has a deep understanding of the math involve in poker games, if their are able to collude effectively, they would win more just playing as much table (without colluding) as they can.
The biggest problem nowadays with decentralised poker is that recent AI poker bots are doing really well. I use one to keep learning and better understanding the game at deep level.
This is a real problem, you won't have anyone playing poker games if the room is populated with bots.
One of the best poker bot has already proved itself able to beat very good high stake players.
There is a lot of interesting conversations on decentralised poker on the thread of the Pangea project (NXT decentralised poker project / seem dead atm)
https://nxtforum.org/index.php?topic=6628.0As a big chunk (very big chunk) of the money a professional poker player win is lost in the rake (around 5% on each pot), the first effective decentralised poker room with a low rake (1%)
could potentially be a huuuuge success and bring lots of money on the plateform.
I know I wouldn't hesitate to play decentralised poker if it allows me to double my annual winnings thanks to a low rake !
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk