Author Topic: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool  (Read 230792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MrMeow

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #765 on: December 05, 2013, 02:05:16 am »
What's going on? Why the sudden drop??

28302 2013-12-05 01:51:45 425 / 75638 -> 0.13497 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20 328 / 61573 -> 0.12796 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47 1711 / 285308 -> 0.14405 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28280 2013-12-05 01:03:34 4357 / 701246 -> 0.14925 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations

Offline devilfish

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #766 on: December 05, 2013, 02:54:30 am »

@recci:
protoshares is 1 year ahead of it's schedule... just saying  :)

- xolokram

Not sure what you mean?

BTC: 1MqCxQ2qD7ZuS3ELFY43wfaBTbA2XkYwDP
PTS: PiuFEJHz6zScALgPWzcu2SDKtWJW4cnUFi
XPM: Af5qzgsEwWaHZdGUq8dUoHkhmH4XBmnGW9

Offline xrpbtc

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #767 on: December 05, 2013, 08:12:20 am »
why so many  "ORPHAN" recently?
28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20 30 / 61573 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47 178 / 285308 -> 0.01499 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28280 2013-12-05 01:03:34 475 / 701246 -> 0.01627 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 1034 / 1237920 -> 0.02007 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 425 / 572167 -> 0.01878 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
28190 2013-12-04 20:16:29 170 / 216312 -> 0.01988 PTS / 25.30 PTS -> added
28180 2013-12-04 19:51:11 2270 / 2996040 -> 0.01917 PTS / 25.30 PTS -> PAID
28039 2013-12-04 14:20:19 434 / 696125 -> 0.01577 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
28005 2013-12-04 13:03:07 1545 / 2327564 -> 0.01678 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27891 2013-12-04 08:22:57 234 / 376084 -> 0.01573 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27880 2013-12-04 07:37:27 113 / 189896 -> 0.01505 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27870 2013-12-04 07:15:50 196 / 287681 -> 0.01723 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27854 2013-12-04 06:43:27 105 / 169745 -> 0.01564 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27846 2013-12-04 06:25:00 638 / 976029 -> 0.01653 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27802 2013-12-04 04:32:05 598 / 872171 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27764 2013-12-04 02:39:43 232 / 325316 -> 0.01803 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27749 2013-12-04 01:57:47 314 / 438078 -> 0.01812 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27724 2013-12-04 01:01:13 641 / 744768 -> 0.02176 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27688 2013-12-03 23:22:08 386 / 426659 -> 0.02288 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27670 2013-12-03 22:22:51 795 / 901423 -> 0.02230 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> PAID
27627 2013-12-03 20:15:30 1457 / 1662560 -> 0.02216 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27535 2013-12-03 16:28:34 134 / 134833 -> 0.02514 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27530 2013-12-03 16:09:01 814 / 892905 -> 0.02305 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27488 2013-12-03 13:56:38 76 / 75374 -> 0.02549 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27484 2013-12-03 13:44:20 1526 / 1622710 -> 0.02380 PTS / 25.31 PTS -> added
27380 2013-12-03 09:13:17 238 / 231008 -> 0.02605 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27252 2013-12-03 03:54:09 730 / 419273 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27211 2013-12-03 01:57:52 599 / 356920 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27170 2013-12-03 00:17:56 870 / 831005 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
PTS: PcgrswHW7GESiGKFvZ7hhWFjrL8KN8XYcX
BTC: 18Mc6jwFSDrxzCJjLzqZpNMoSKQewpVu5P
XRP: rpfJrfozeXX7h2miPPP9xpb9bFgNT5Mz5T

Offline gigamike

Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #768 on: December 05, 2013, 08:26:49 am »
Hi,

newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?

TIA,

Mike

Offline jabbaah

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #769 on: December 05, 2013, 08:57:26 am »
Hi,

newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?

TIA,

Mike

The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.
http://www.dmsp.de/Protoshares   ---   https://github.com/spommerening/ptstools
PTS: PouLU5HendYGqZXwHnzdvBeMboJsUu1z2b   ---   BTC: 1QLNqVxhi3JrC8A4PfTF7jCoSi4h4pQV1R

Offline zvs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #770 on: December 05, 2013, 09:01:06 am »
33 rejects, 5088 valids on a Buffalo, NY server
29 rejects, 2433 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
24 rejects, 1773 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
0 rejects, 158 valids on a Scranton, PA server
2 rejects, 144 valids on a Dallas, TX server
1 reject, 74 valids on a Houston, TX server
42 rejects, 1745 valids on a Germany server

Now it's

92 rejects, 10377 valids on Buffalo, NY server (8 cores)
57 rejects, 5090 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
60 rejects, 4352 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
7 rejects, 1070 valids on Scranton, PA server (*8 cores) --  ed: it just seems like 4 cores.  gimp Xeon =(
10 rejects, 1128 valids on Dallas, TX server (4 cores)
5 rejects, 448 valids on Houston, TX server (varies)
69 rejects, 4053 valids on Germany server, (7 cores)
18 rejects, 1494 valids on Lenoir, NC server (8 cores)

these are all using the latest git pull, diff versions of ubuntu,  about half on 12.04 and the other half on 13.10

they're also all using the 1024mb memory option

oh, jfyi, that Dallas server is from burst.net...  any new customer can get a server for a month for $1 from them, w/ no strings attached (besides having to remember to cancel it in time)

I ran the Windows client for a bit and it started out with 457 accepted and 3 rejects... by the time I saw it to cancel it it was at 677 accepted and 77 rejects.

the linux client disconnects and reconnects if it gets 3 rejects in a row, the windows client doesnt
Pls to join Primedice 3 and frolic about merrily whilst gambling awe-inspiring quantities of bitcoins. The power of Christ compels you.

I have a dogecoin p2pool at Nogleg.

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #771 on: December 05, 2013, 10:50:04 am »
@xrpbtc:
orphans are normal, it's nothing you can prevent 100%
the orphan "streak" was a f---up on the backend of the pool, read the posts about it here

@zvs:
windows binaries are not yet updated, i'll do this later today
the reconnect on rejects is just a (dirty) workaround anyway
i would prefer to find the real origin of the problem and fix that

@MrMeow:
maybe you shouldn't compare rounds with ~60k shares to rounds with 200k+ shares?

- xolokram
« Last Edit: December 05, 2013, 12:06:09 pm by xolokram »
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline gigamike

Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #772 on: December 05, 2013, 12:04:33 pm »
Hi,

newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?

TIA,

Mike

The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.

thanks for the response :)...i lower the number of my server and rather upgraded on fewer server but with higher CPUs

Mike

Offline jabbaah

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #773 on: December 05, 2013, 12:29:45 pm »
Hi,

newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?

TIA,

Mike

The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.

thanks for the response :)...i lower the number of my server and rather upgraded on fewer server but with higher CPUs

Mike

You may want to have a look at my ptstools (see my signature for web urls) for easier installation and monitoring your servers.
There is also a small puppet manifest available.
http://www.dmsp.de/Protoshares   ---   https://github.com/spommerening/ptstools
PTS: PouLU5HendYGqZXwHnzdvBeMboJsUu1z2b   ---   BTC: 1QLNqVxhi3JrC8A4PfTF7jCoSi4h4pQV1R

Offline afr33sl4ve

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #774 on: December 05, 2013, 01:13:59 pm »
Hey. uh. xolo... I'm kinda concerned here.

http://imgur.com/RpPPG8z

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #775 on: December 05, 2013, 01:34:49 pm »
@afr33sl4ve:
transaction was successfully executed in block #27991
block id is 000000a68d85c4a81241fa79964bb6bfdca3a407c933a175ff7216aff89e3c12
tx id is b1b0a8e4737b28c46995caaec70d087209a214ec4bfb92375ee273e82237719e

btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?

tldr: check your client/blockchain data, do a rescan (parameter -rescan on your pts client)
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline zvs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #776 on: December 05, 2013, 02:45:39 pm »
@xrpbtc:
orphans are normal, it's nothing you can prevent 100%
the orphan "streak" was a f---up on the backend of the pool, read the posts about it here

I am looking at my log and I received all the blocks solved by beeeeer from between 7-10 seconds after it reports them as being found on the website (which means that one or both of our clocks are off but also there shouldn't be a range of 7-10 seconds, shouldn't be greater than 1 second)

but for the one that was orphaned, 28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20, I received:

2013-12-05 01:39:22 received block 0000008c06a5cd9f9d1aa04fff50555e49215efe7a2df6c7fd152f6f7df44348 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:39:22 Committing 91 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:39:22 SetBestChain: new best=0000008c06a5cd9f9d1aa04fff50555e49215efe7a2df6c7fd152f6f7df44348  height=28296  log2_work=37.117473  tx=121129  date=2013-12-05 01:39:16 progress=0.999994
2013-12-05 01:39:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

about 4m earlier.

I guess the node reaction after block #28295 was received is relevant too:

2013-12-05 01:37:22 received block 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 Committing 16 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:37:22 SetBestChain: new best=000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20  height=28295  log2_work=37.117204  tx=121100  date=2013-12-05 01:37:11 progress=0.999990
2013-12-05 01:37:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx

all those nodes requesting 28294+, never received 28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47, until I sent it to them after block 28295

the same holds true for block 28303 (after beer got 28302 about 65 seconds earlier):

2013-12-05 01:52:57 received block 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 Committing 40 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:52:57 SetBestChain: new best=00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859  height=28303  log2_work=37.119355  tx=121241  date=2013-12-05 01:52:51 progress=0.999994
2013-12-05 01:52:57 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx

so I think protoshare client connectivity is probably an issue here, for some of these

put 5.9.24.81 on addnode  :D
« Last Edit: December 05, 2013, 02:59:14 pm by zvs »
Pls to join Primedice 3 and frolic about merrily whilst gambling awe-inspiring quantities of bitcoins. The power of Christ compels you.

I have a dogecoin p2pool at Nogleg.

Offline ryen123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #777 on: December 05, 2013, 02:47:44 pm »

btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?



There is this other block explorer > http://coinplorer.com/PTS
Latest by GawMiners | DigitalOcean Sign-Up Receive $10 Credit
Singapore P2Pool: DarkCoin

Offline drmyfore

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #778 on: December 05, 2013, 03:27:26 pm »
Hi, I have some questions:
My CPU are Xeon E5-2680v2 * 2 (20C40T, HT enabled), I want to use your miner so
1. Which edition settings is best for me? (that is to say, i want to know the different between avx, sse4,intel and sphlib, and which is the fastest)
2. Is Hyper-threading useful for mining?(I can run 40 threads when ht is enabled, and 20 threads when ht is disabled)

Offline MrMeow

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #779 on: December 05, 2013, 03:40:04 pm »
@xolokram I'm sorry I should've been more specific...

28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations

My question is why the drop in shares distributed. Does it have to do with the growing complexity? I'm a newb