Author Topic: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool  (Read 414772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline r05

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #798 on: December 07, 2013, 07:34:45 pm »
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!

I'm also having this issue.  Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected.  Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind.  Then I see my recent payouts.  Trying to figure out what's going on.

Probably because a lot of the time there aren't any nodes with incoming connections to connect to?...  I had a friend that had the same problem, not getting blockchain to update, just told him to addnode 5.9.24.81. 

It's at 135/500 connections right now.  I have it set for only 20 outbound connections.. but when it does lose one, it still takes up to a hundred or two tries on average to find a new node to connect to.
Thanks for this - been trying to find a way to get the wallet to play nice all day. Where did you get that node IP from?
If I have helped you, please consider buying me a beer:
PTS: PZ6ZED8q1i7nQqnZiwFHdgLMELi3sgpnzL
BTC: 1CPF64k1AraWAUiDSh2QthRhbtJJznzRtw

Offline superresistant

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #797 on: December 07, 2013, 11:49:42 am »
Hi,

Is the hash rate still bugged ?
I don't undestand. It is going faster when I use 1 thread than 48. Explain me please.
Should I use 48 instance of 1 thread instead of 1 instance of 48 thread ?

Thanks

Offline zvs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #796 on: December 07, 2013, 11:26:33 am »
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!

I'm also having this issue.  Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected.  Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind.  Then I see my recent payouts.  Trying to figure out what's going on.

Probably because a lot of the time there aren't any nodes with incoming connections to connect to?...  I had a friend that had the same problem, not getting blockchain to update, just told him to addnode 5.9.24.81. 

It's at 135/500 connections right now.  I have it set for only 20 outbound connections.. but when it does lose one, it still takes up to a hundred or two tries on average to find a new node to connect to.
Pls to join Primedice 3 and frolic about merrily whilst gambling awe-inspiring quantities of bitcoins. The power of Christ compels you.

I have a dogecoin p2pool at Nogleg.

Offline Darkhand

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #795 on: December 07, 2013, 10:53:59 am »
I just had 3 different servers, from 3 different IPs simultaneously start getting rejects a few moments ago.  The reconnect feature got things going again, but something's up on the pool end!
« Last Edit: December 07, 2013, 11:04:55 am by Darkhand »

Offline Gilligan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #794 on: December 07, 2013, 04:56:39 am »
Should I see all of these in my user stats? Should I be getting paid for all of these shares found?

[WORKER] collision found: 49370207 <-> 43324938 #854 @ 1386391677 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:48:08 | 23.6 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 29 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 20094664 <-> 26466244 #876 @ 1386391778 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:49:25 | 23.4 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 30 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 17230700 <-> 66211955 #914 @ 1386391809 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:50:06 | 24.0 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 31 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 42137064 <-> 12638275 #920 @ 1386391822 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:50:11 | 24.1 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 32 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)

I am just curious because when I used to mine XPM every share found would show up in my stats and I would get paid based on its' value.  Now I have 3000 shares and only get paid on 10-20 of them.  What gives?

Gilligan~

Offline Kulizaj

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #793 on: December 07, 2013, 12:52:39 am »
running on my vista machine and working great
pts: Pw24pwrYm1Yf3Fz8PaEL8gVc9dCBYprdkd
xpm: AZeS8UP5J2fSdcgpBRkB7mckgpyvTQLvTM
btc: 1LCga998uqk3YEKoZfSZ6JYTDcK2Uj1CvN

Offline pvaladares

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #792 on: December 07, 2013, 12:46:44 am »
For anyone using linux on 32 bits in order to properly compile just replace @
https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt

Code: [Select]
else (UNIX)
    SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf64")

by

Code: [Select]
else (UNIX)
    SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf32")

Test on latest Ubuntu version.
PTS : PkbJAm9uxuGgC9n2NVwWYs8bvX3Mj8uAg3 | MMC : M91vp33SSVBG7N3X9CbrgMcwSBxTDQeDAb
BTC : 1CrAkkYZrVCnwDKSBw3bcnMSYMakEhfB6N
Trade BTC/PTS @ cryptsy.com

Offline Sycophantic

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #791 on: December 06, 2013, 08:08:01 pm »
"no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds"

Just for me? What i am doing wrong?

Using 54.201.26.128:1337

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #790 on: December 06, 2013, 06:04:18 pm »
hi,
I'm sorry for the late reply. i'm compiling the windows binaries right now, i'll update this (and the first) post when they're uploaded to mediafire

here's the hotfix #3: *CLICK* (Windows 64Bit Binaries)
containing the 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix :)

@macos:
i dont have a test environment, but let me know if you're able to fix something with the osx makefile.

@drmyfore:
i think you'll have to test the best value for you on your own, as the performance the miner is depending on your cpu & ram
and hypter-threading's additional performance is fluctuating too

- xolokram
« Last Edit: December 06, 2013, 06:44:57 pm by xolokram »
stats for pts@beeeeer.org
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #789 on: December 06, 2013, 08:15:32 am »
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...

this is also my problem. But what i did was virtualbox and setup debian...but yes better if we can run on mac

Mike
QT client does not link properly on Mavericks, this issue is inherited from Bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3228

Offline Darkhand

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #788 on: December 06, 2013, 03:33:57 am »
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!

I'm also having this issue.  Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected.  Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind.  Then I see my recent payouts.  Trying to figure out what's going on.

Offline BitThink

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #787 on: December 06, 2013, 02:58:56 am »
@xolokram I'm sorry I should've been more specific...

28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations

My question is why the drop in shares distributed. Does it have to do with the growing complexity? I'm a newb

The block rewards decreases after some (2000+) blocks. Its initial value was 50.

Offline gigamike

Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #786 on: December 06, 2013, 12:46:31 am »
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...

this is also my problem. But what i did was virtualbox and setup debian...but yes better if we can run on mac

Mike

Offline sth

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #785 on: December 05, 2013, 11:22:35 pm »
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...
PTS: PaLMohgzkpot2biUPsTEkfW1geMfrSYVjw
BTC: 19ifwoJs1DoFVSoPtNfS8EKhAsxBQGuVsD

Offline btc2084

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« Reply #784 on: December 05, 2013, 07:59:03 pm »
@xolokram:
please dirty-workaround the Windows version!  I switched back to your XPM pool until I can get an understanding if PTS mining is not just heating the room. :)

...

@btc2084:
as you see the rejects come in blockwise (ends on "work received"), there's a bug somewhere (in the miner i ---guess---)
this is a known issues, there's a dirty workaround in the latest github (not helpful for windows user i know)